Hindsight Is 20/20
On July 26, 2005, D.C. police Lt. Sherman Lankford made a boo-boo. According to a department investigation, he arrived at the scene of a crime, took a pair of binoculars from a car being searched, and handed them to another officer.
It’s not clear whether he stole the binoculars or just mishandled evidence, but it was enough to launch an internal investigation of the 20-year police-force veteran. About seven months later, the department notified Lankford that disciplinary action was being considered—a process that, under the law, must result in a decision within 45 days from the time notice is given. But it wasn’t until May 4, 2006, that a panel chaired by then commander and now Chief Cathy Lanier recommended firing the lieutenant.
Lankford got his final notice on July 20—140 days after he’d been warned his job was on the line. He fought the decision, and the D.C. Office of Employee Appeals reversed his termination this March, meaning the city will have to fork over a few hundred thousand dollars in back wages because it took so long to get the disciplinary ball rolling. Lanier’s office has not responded to requests for comment.
One Response to “Hindsight Is 20/20”
Leave a Reply
Recent Posts
- Jeffrey Wright: Washington Native Dominates a Theater Near You (0
)
The District-born, St. Albans-educated Jeffrey Wright may have chosen to be more character actor tha… - Final Lottery Contract Vote Set for Dec. 16 (0)
High noon will come after all. Ward 2 Councilmember Jack Evans sent a letter today to Council Chairm… - D.C. Police vs. Mentally Ill Residents, Part 2 (2)
In the wake of the police shooting death of David Kerstetter, I was told by the D.C. police departm… - Postcards From Home: Film and Paper Archive (0)
Taxi and Pedestrian, 1994… - Vinny Cerrato Must Wish He Stayed Off the Air (0)
The beating that Vinny Cerrato took from listeners to his WTEM talk show this morning was so severe,…
- Jeffrey Wright: Washington Native Dominates a Theater Near You (0
May 12th, 2008 at 8:50 am
Imagine that, I wonder how they process these cases, there are MANY MANY more still waiting that occurred whay before this “official” decided to STEAL evidence..How is is “NOT CLEAR” if he mishandled the evidence, its pretty clear if you ask me what he did, he STOLE the evidence….What about the rest of the cases that are just sitting collecting dust….