<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If You&#8217;re Not &#8220;All Right,&#8221; You&#8217;re Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/</link>
	<description>68.3 Square Miles of D.C. News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:05:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-119081</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/#comment-119081</guid>
		<description>web site, walkman, alright . . .  maybe dumbass will make it in there . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>web site, walkman, alright . . .  maybe dumbass will make it in there . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-119074</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/#comment-119074</guid>
		<description>And the similes keep coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the similes keep coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronny M</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-119058</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronny M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/#comment-119058</guid>
		<description>Entertainment Weekly is about as relevant today as a VCR player in an age of DVD Players, Blu-Ray Disc, Movies on Ipods. It clear that they aren&#039;t the source they used to be.  They can get a new staff, or just put it out of its misery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entertainment Weekly is about as relevant today as a VCR player in an age of DVD Players, Blu-Ray Disc, Movies on Ipods. It clear that they aren't the source they used to be.  They can get a new staff, or just put it out of its misery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJF</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-118426</link>
		<dc:creator>MJF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/#comment-118426</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to figure out exactly when EW made the transition to shitty. I&#039;ve subscribed since high school more than 10 years ago. I saw the general decline over the past couple years, but this year it has just been egregious - unnecessary use of anonymous sources (i.e. anonymously quoting someone&#039;s opinion on Britney Spears&#039; hat), simpering treatment of celebs, etc. And now this alright thing...;) When do you think the transition happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm trying to figure out exactly when EW made the transition to shitty. I've subscribed since high school more than 10 years ago. I saw the general decline over the past couple years, but this year it has just been egregious - unnecessary use of anonymous sources (i.e. anonymously quoting someone's opinion on Britney Spears' hat), simpering treatment of celebs, etc. And now this alright thing...;) When do you think the transition happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-118411</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/#comment-118411</guid>
		<description>I think &#039;personification&#039; would be more appropriate in this case.

Nonstandard usage is a fair form of revolt against the language Nazis (and a fine excuse for laziness!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 'personification' would be more appropriate in this case.</p>
<p>Nonstandard usage is a fair form of revolt against the language Nazis (and a fine excuse for laziness!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Beaujon</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-118395</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Beaujon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/#comment-118395</guid>
		<description>Max, I agree it stretches the definition, but neither &quot;metaphor&quot; nor &quot;mixed metaphor&quot; cuts it in this case. The likening is implicit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, I agree it stretches the definition, but neither "metaphor" nor "mixed metaphor" cuts it in this case. The likening is implicit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-118394</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/04/01/if-youre-not-all-right-youre-wrong/#comment-118394</guid>
		<description>The pot calls the kettle black. The quote from the EW story you cite is not a simile, there&#039;s nothing be compared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pot calls the kettle black. The quote from the EW story you cite is not a simile, there's nothing be compared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

