News & Featuresblogs
City Desk

Please Stop Calling It a $611 Million Ballpark, Please

This morning, the Washington Post flooded the proverbial zone on its Nationals Park coverage—dozens of its reporters documented every last aspect of the ballpark’s first official major-league game. The Post also flooded the paper with an inaccuracy: That the stadium cost $611 million.

The $611 million figure reflects the cap that the D.C. Council imposed on District financing back when it approved the stadium deal. Since then, costs have risen, largely due to inaccurate estimations of land acquisition costs by Chief Financial Officer Natwar M. Gandhi. A January report issued by the CFO’s office showed that land and environmental remediation costs had to date run $43 million over estimates. (To get around the cap, some legal costs were moved out of the capped-cost category to an uncapped “ancillary costs” category last summer.)

Depending on the outcome of various land disputes (check out some early CP reporting on the issue), the local contribution to stadium construction is likely to edge into the mid-to-upper 600s, with the total project cost—including contributions from the team, Major League Baseball, and the federal government—likely to end up close to $800 million.

And yet:

  • In their A1 lede-all, Dave Sheinin and Daniel LeDuc refer to “a $611 million, taxpayer-built palace in a formerly blighted part of the District”
  • Marc Fisher kicks off his column with, “So, Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer, what did you get for your $611 million?”
  • Tom Boswell refers to MLB’s sweetheart deal as comprising “a $611 million stadium and a $450 million purchase price by the Lerners”
  • Barry Svrluga’s sports-section fronter talks about the Nats’ “brand new, custom built, $611 million home”
  • Philip Kennicott wraps up his pan of the stadium and its surroundings with the line, “All that for $611 million in public money.”

Here’s the thing: Plenty of people have repeated the $611 million figure, but the Post should know the number isn’t right. They published a very helpful graphic saying so last week!

Photo by D.F. Shapinsky for pingnews/Shapinsky MultiMedia

One Response to “Please Stop Calling It a $611 Million Ballpark, Please”

  1. BBC Says:

    Then we have things like METRO and street upgrades that are grouped in with stadium costs. Hay, I think I should hold off on having my house repointed because someone my lump that cost in with the stadium costs!

Leave a Reply

CarTango
DC SEARCH
calendar
restaurants
movies
classified
personals

Find an Event

Enter a keyword, select the type of event, and the particular day this week below.

Submit your event to the City Paper's Event Calendar.

Find a Restaurant

Enter a restaurant name, or select a cuisine and neighborhood below.

Find a Movie

Select a movie theater in the box below to see a list of all movies at that theater.

...Or view a full list of theaters, films, and showtimes.

Search Classified Ads

Post a Classified Ad

Find It

Find a Match

Age range: to
Find It

Who saw you? Check I Saw You
Looking for something kinky? Wild Side

City Paper Newsletter
advertisement

Get a Car

Search inventory on the City Paper's CarTango website:

Free Stuff

CP Events

Find yours

This Week

Current Issue
The Issue of Oct. 10 - 16, 2008

This Week in
City Paper History

  • Angels Without Wings
    The D.C. Guardian Angels aspire to fight crime like comic-book superheroes. But are they more comic than hero?
    Oct. 2 - 8, 1998
  • Fare Elections
    Cabdriver aims for an African presidency.
    Oct. 3 - 9, 2003
  • Kicking and Screaming
    Soccer is supposed to be the beautiful game. In D.C.'s biggest youth-soccer league, it's turning ugly.
    Oct. 3 - 9, 2003
advertisement
advertisement