<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barnum &amp; Bailey &amp; Davis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:26:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lost Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-646128</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-646128</guid>
		<description>Another series of banter between Ari and Eric and turle with a love interest at last!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another series of banter between Ari and Eric and turle with a love interest at last!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speeder</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-443161</link>
		<dc:creator>Speeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-443161</guid>
		<description>LeMond could sustain about 5.8 watts per kilo of bodyweight for 1-hour. Thats a funtional Threshold Power of 390 watts. That requires about 5.4 liters of sustained oxygen and a VO2 max of about 6.5 liters/minute. We know this from his 42:30 on Alp D&#039;Huez and his statement&#039;s from using SRM power meters in the early 90s. SO he had a VO2 max of 94 for those efforts.

Lance had 6.7 watts per kilo for 35 minutes, and likely 6.5 watts per kilo for 1-hour. He needs about 6.0 liters/min of sustained oxygen consumption to do this!! That takes a VO2 max of about 7.5 liters/min. 7,500 ml of oxygen at a weight of 74kg is about 101 VO2 max.

A 101 VO2 max is ONLY possible with chemo boosters, Interlukins and peptoid hormones, certainly not without modern day assistance. AND.... They HAVE to be a super-responder to drug-therepy. You dont get from an 78 completely un-doped VO2 potential to a 101 without being a super-responder to the drugs. Use some resoning folks.

Lance&#039;s highest ever un-doped, VO2 max test in sep. 1999 was 81.7 at a weight of 79 kilos. That in FACT was the highest he ever got. Now... You have heart stroke volume, but Lance&#039;s heart is normal sized... If one is to look at the medical records they show his heart is high normal... So discounting the whole larger than life heart, he needs some serious assistance to do 1/20th of what he&#039;s done.... ANYONE human ON EARTH needs so serous F- assistance to do a 101 VO2 max and 500 watts for 1-hour.... 

Totally un-doped, using the highest ever VO2 max... He&#039;d do about 75 place, and he&#039;d struggle to recover and maybe get dropped and DNF.

LeMond degenerated to not being able to get through six stages in 1994 when Chechini, Ferrari, and the other doctors started up their hGh, testosterone, EPO, PFC; pez dispencer.... and he had an un-doped VO2 max of over 90 even in old age he still does.... I dont think LeMond blood-doped because sh$t, I could get up to that w/kg if I was jacked.... And I&#039;m just some hack....

If LeMond jacked he&#039;d of had higher than 95 and we would have record or physical proof of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LeMond could sustain about 5.8 watts per kilo of bodyweight for 1-hour. Thats a funtional Threshold Power of 390 watts. That requires about 5.4 liters of sustained oxygen and a VO2 max of about 6.5 liters/minute. We know this from his 42:30 on Alp D'Huez and his statement's from using SRM power meters in the early 90s. SO he had a VO2 max of 94 for those efforts.</p>
<p>Lance had 6.7 watts per kilo for 35 minutes, and likely 6.5 watts per kilo for 1-hour. He needs about 6.0 liters/min of sustained oxygen consumption to do this!! That takes a VO2 max of about 7.5 liters/min. 7,500 ml of oxygen at a weight of 74kg is about 101 VO2 max.</p>
<p>A 101 VO2 max is ONLY possible with chemo boosters, Interlukins and peptoid hormones, certainly not without modern day assistance. AND.... They HAVE to be a super-responder to drug-therepy. You dont get from an 78 completely un-doped VO2 potential to a 101 without being a super-responder to the drugs. Use some resoning folks.</p>
<p>Lance's highest ever un-doped, VO2 max test in sep. 1999 was 81.7 at a weight of 79 kilos. That in FACT was the highest he ever got. Now... You have heart stroke volume, but Lance's heart is normal sized... If one is to look at the medical records they show his heart is high normal... So discounting the whole larger than life heart, he needs some serious assistance to do 1/20th of what he's done.... ANYONE human ON EARTH needs so serous F- assistance to do a 101 VO2 max and 500 watts for 1-hour.... </p>
<p>Totally un-doped, using the highest ever VO2 max... He'd do about 75 place, and he'd struggle to recover and maybe get dropped and DNF.</p>
<p>LeMond degenerated to not being able to get through six stages in 1994 when Chechini, Ferrari, and the other doctors started up their hGh, testosterone, EPO, PFC; pez dispencer.... and he had an un-doped VO2 max of over 90 even in old age he still does.... I dont think LeMond blood-doped because sh$t, I could get up to that w/kg if I was jacked.... And I'm just some hack....</p>
<p>If LeMond jacked he'd of had higher than 95 and we would have record or physical proof of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Everheart</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-193348</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Everheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-193348</guid>
		<description>Where did Tim herman go? Is he like April, in like a lion, out like a lamb?

And Tim, could you please explain how a clean rider could beat the best riders on the world while on the best performance enhancing drugs available at the time (Ullrich, Pantani, etc.)? 

This is physiologically impossible.

Also, why can&#039;t Dr. Coyle produce any of the data that he allegedly collected for his study of Lance&#039;s allegedly unique physiology wherein he stated that Lance&#039;s performance improvement could be attributed to an increase in efficiency (a claim that seems prima fascia utterly false--if it were possible to increase performance by 3% through improving efficiency, it would stand to reason that other pro cyclists might pursue this as a training methodology since it&#039;s VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE for an elite athlete in his prime to squeeze those kinds of gains out of changing the biomechanics of a repetitive motion he&#039;s trained for decades. Talk to any top physiologist or even the trainer for the local community college table tennis team--just ain&#039;t gonna happen).

Well Tim, since you elected to jump into the fray (undoubtedly on the demand of your employer--and we should believe you, yet another person riding Lance&#039;s coattails and being paid to defend his public image as a neutral trustworthy expert on this because. . .why? You&#039;ve really pulled a page from the McCain/Phil Gramm messaging playbook here.)

Anyway, you elected to join this conversation, clearly to make an ad hominem attack on A MIDWESTERN HOUSEWIFE WHO HAS NOTHING TO GAIN FROM STATING HER EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE, and then you run away.

That&#039;s how 4-year-old girls fight, Tom. 

Can&#039;t you, and Lance, do just a little bit better than that? 

It&#039;s getting harder and harder for you to contain what many people in the cycling world have already concluded: there&#039;s no way in h e double hockey sticks that Lance won seven Tours straight clean.

David Millar, who was banned from pro cycling for two years for doping, was never caught using epo. He admitted to it only after the cops raided his house. So why should anyone even give Lance&#039;s assertions that he never failed a drug test (again, utterly false, see David Walsh&#039;s book for the details) any consideration as proof he didn&#039;t dope? 

His results speak for themselves. He beat the best riders in the world at the time WHILE THEY WERE DOPED OUT OF THEIR GOURDS. Not possible!

Oh, and everyone who is out waving the anticancer flag, yeah, cancer sucks, but how does it jive with Lance&#039;s anticancer crusade when he dates two Hollywood starlets back to back who are both smokers? Is that part of Living Strong? 

L&#039;eggo your ego, brah, and go spank some skins with McConaughey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did Tim herman go? Is he like April, in like a lion, out like a lamb?</p>
<p>And Tim, could you please explain how a clean rider could beat the best riders on the world while on the best performance enhancing drugs available at the time (Ullrich, Pantani, etc.)? </p>
<p>This is physiologically impossible.</p>
<p>Also, why can't Dr. Coyle produce any of the data that he allegedly collected for his study of Lance's allegedly unique physiology wherein he stated that Lance's performance improvement could be attributed to an increase in efficiency (a claim that seems prima fascia utterly false--if it were possible to increase performance by 3% through improving efficiency, it would stand to reason that other pro cyclists might pursue this as a training methodology since it's VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE for an elite athlete in his prime to squeeze those kinds of gains out of changing the biomechanics of a repetitive motion he's trained for decades. Talk to any top physiologist or even the trainer for the local community college table tennis team--just ain't gonna happen).</p>
<p>Well Tim, since you elected to jump into the fray (undoubtedly on the demand of your employer--and we should believe you, yet another person riding Lance's coattails and being paid to defend his public image as a neutral trustworthy expert on this because. . .why? You've really pulled a page from the McCain/Phil Gramm messaging playbook here.)</p>
<p>Anyway, you elected to join this conversation, clearly to make an ad hominem attack on A MIDWESTERN HOUSEWIFE WHO HAS NOTHING TO GAIN FROM STATING HER EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE, and then you run away.</p>
<p>That's how 4-year-old girls fight, Tom. </p>
<p>Can't you, and Lance, do just a little bit better than that? </p>
<p>It's getting harder and harder for you to contain what many people in the cycling world have already concluded: there's no way in h e double hockey sticks that Lance won seven Tours straight clean.</p>
<p>David Millar, who was banned from pro cycling for two years for doping, was never caught using epo. He admitted to it only after the cops raided his house. So why should anyone even give Lance's assertions that he never failed a drug test (again, utterly false, see David Walsh's book for the details) any consideration as proof he didn't dope? </p>
<p>His results speak for themselves. He beat the best riders in the world at the time WHILE THEY WERE DOPED OUT OF THEIR GOURDS. Not possible!</p>
<p>Oh, and everyone who is out waving the anticancer flag, yeah, cancer sucks, but how does it jive with Lance's anticancer crusade when he dates two Hollywood starlets back to back who are both smokers? Is that part of Living Strong? </p>
<p>L'eggo your ego, brah, and go spank some skins with McConaughey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid Rothchild</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-113460</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid Rothchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-113460</guid>
		<description>Dear Tim Herman,

I just finished From Lance to Landis.  In the author&#039;s note Walsh mentions about 100 people.  In addition to Walsh and Betsy Andreu, you have a lot of liars to sue.  You probably should be getting to work on the lawsuit.  Btw, my training is stalled and I&#039;d like to know if you could ask Lance about the timing and dosage for r EPO and if he has recommendations for any other helpful medical products.  No bovine hemoglobin, but I think he has some experience with Actovegin.(sp?)

By the way, me and Dirk are working on a new series of films and if Lance is ever in the SFV tell him to stop by the set and maybe we can have him do a couple of scenes.  We usually take a couple of shots to help with endurance.  Sorry to disappoint but porn is fake too..  At any rate if he&#039;s in the valley we could hook him up with hookers and blow...

Sincerely,

Reid Rothchild</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tim Herman,</p>
<p>I just finished From Lance to Landis.  In the author's note Walsh mentions about 100 people.  In addition to Walsh and Betsy Andreu, you have a lot of liars to sue.  You probably should be getting to work on the lawsuit.  Btw, my training is stalled and I'd like to know if you could ask Lance about the timing and dosage for r EPO and if he has recommendations for any other helpful medical products.  No bovine hemoglobin, but I think he has some experience with Actovegin.(sp?)</p>
<p>By the way, me and Dirk are working on a new series of films and if Lance is ever in the SFV tell him to stop by the set and maybe we can have him do a couple of scenes.  We usually take a couple of shots to help with endurance.  Sorry to disappoint but porn is fake too..  At any rate if he's in the valley we could hook him up with hookers and blow...</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Reid Rothchild</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid Rothchild</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-113184</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid Rothchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-113184</guid>
		<description>http://community.active.com/blogs/MartinDugard/2007/06

Floyd told Martin Dugard last June 07 that Lance Doped.

My buddy Austin Murphy told me weeks ago about the pre-Tour piece he was working on, but swore me to secrecy until it came out. Ah, but now we can talk. A great piece on doping at the Tour, pointing a lot of fingers at Lance Armstrong, in particular. Two very accomplished cyclists who have ridden extensively with Lance have told me that he doped. 

Tim Herman, I hope you sleep well.  Enjoy the money now sucking Lance&#039;s a$$ because eternity is a long time for the place you&#039;re going...

Anybody speak Spanish?
Follow link for LA&#039;s secret ingredient.

http://forums.roadbikereview.com/showthread.php?p=1471797#poststop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://community.active.com/blogs/MartinDugard/2007/06" rel="nofollow">http://community.active.com/blogs/MartinDugard/2007/06</a></p>
<p>Floyd told Martin Dugard last June 07 that Lance Doped.</p>
<p>My buddy Austin Murphy told me weeks ago about the pre-Tour piece he was working on, but swore me to secrecy until it came out. Ah, but now we can talk. A great piece on doping at the Tour, pointing a lot of fingers at Lance Armstrong, in particular. Two very accomplished cyclists who have ridden extensively with Lance have told me that he doped. </p>
<p>Tim Herman, I hope you sleep well.  Enjoy the money now sucking Lance's a$$ because eternity is a long time for the place you're going...</p>
<p>Anybody speak Spanish?<br />
Follow link for LA's secret ingredient.</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.roadbikereview.com/showthread.php?p=1471797#poststop" rel="nofollow">http://forums.roadbikereview.com/showthread.php?p=1471797#poststop</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105757</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105757</guid>
		<description>Robert Garford-
Sorry to break it to you but Richard Virenque does speak a little english, and also when you are a top pro living in Europe,and racing in France, you tend to pick up the language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Garford-<br />
Sorry to break it to you but Richard Virenque does speak a little english, and also when you are a top pro living in Europe,and racing in France, you tend to pick up the language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Garford</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105281</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Garford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105281</guid>
		<description>Yap yap yap

your cycling knowledge is obviously as limited as your tiny pea-sized brain.Why dont you go over to the DP and fantasize about Floyd.

RG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yap yap yap</p>
<p>your cycling knowledge is obviously as limited as your tiny pea-sized brain.Why dont you go over to the DP and fantasize about Floyd.</p>
<p>RG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105280</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105280</guid>
		<description>Actually, if you would like to continue this, bring it over here  http://www.cyclingforums.com/f30-grand-tours---giro---tour-de-france---vuelta-a-espa&#xF1;a.html

I am going to stop urinating on this discussion as now, this is a personal insultathon that has nothing to do with the topic.  However, I would love to keep making you look ridiculous if you are game.  I have nothing but time and IQ to spend..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, if you would like to continue this, bring it over here  <a href="http://www.cyclingforums.com/f30-grand-tours---giro---tour-de-france---vuelta-a-espa&#xF1;a.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyclingforums.com/f30-grand-tours---giro---tour-de-france---vuelta-a-espa&#xF1;a.html</a></p>
<p>I am going to stop urinating on this discussion as now, this is a personal insultathon that has nothing to do with the topic.  However, I would love to keep making you look ridiculous if you are game.  I have nothing but time and IQ to spend..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105279</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105279</guid>
		<description>Yea, lets call it a truce...you know, the kind where you admit that you look like a moron and continued to defend your moronity (that isn&#039;t a word) even thought it is obvious that you are a....well for lack of a better word...moron, and I continue to be bemused by your inability to actually think your way out of a paper bag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, lets call it a truce...you know, the kind where you admit that you look like a moron and continued to defend your moronity (that isn't a word) even thought it is obvious that you are a....well for lack of a better word...moron, and I continue to be bemused by your inability to actually think your way out of a paper bag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Garford</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105277</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Garford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105277</guid>
		<description>Kung-fu master says: &#8220;One who does not wish to have his buttocks handed to him, should not present buttocks in first place, shamma lamma lamma ding dong&#8221;

hahaha deluded AND tirseome
lmfao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kung-fu master says: &#8220;One who does not wish to have his buttocks handed to him, should not present buttocks in first place, shamma lamma lamma ding dong&#8221;</p>
<p>hahaha deluded AND tirseome<br />
lmfao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105274</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105274</guid>
		<description>Kung-fu master says: &quot;One who does not wish to have his buttocks handed to him, should not present buttocks in first place, shamma lamma lamma ding dong&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kung-fu master says: "One who does not wish to have his buttocks handed to him, should not present buttocks in first place, shamma lamma lamma ding dong"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Garford</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105273</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Garford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105273</guid>
		<description>Yap, yap, yap

tiresome 

RG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yap, yap, yap</p>
<p>tiresome </p>
<p>RG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105272</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105272</guid>
		<description>&quot;RV does not speak English and is therefore unlikely to know him personally as you suggest. There are thousands of cyclists and each one of those do no know the others &#8216;personally&#8217;.&quot;

And there are thousands of people who have opinions based on nothing but their opinion...you know...like you.  I also hear that we each have an....well, just look in the mirror and come up with the euphemism for your reflection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"RV does not speak English and is therefore unlikely to know him personally as you suggest. There are thousands of cyclists and each one of those do no know the others &#8216;personally&#8217;."</p>
<p>And there are thousands of people who have opinions based on nothing but their opinion...you know...like you.  I also hear that we each have an....well, just look in the mirror and come up with the euphemism for your reflection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105271</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105271</guid>
		<description>I like the fairytale that Floyd tested positive for testosterone?  No, I am pretty sure he tested positive...yep, very sure.  Have you actually followed the Landis case?

That is beside the point, and not germane to this topic.

Yea, you have 9+ years on me, but I am sensing that your kung-fu powers are not as strong as mine.  Really, I suggest that you just stop...really......stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the fairytale that Floyd tested positive for testosterone?  No, I am pretty sure he tested positive...yep, very sure.  Have you actually followed the Landis case?</p>
<p>That is beside the point, and not germane to this topic.</p>
<p>Yea, you have 9+ years on me, but I am sensing that your kung-fu powers are not as strong as mine.  Really, I suggest that you just stop...really......stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/comment-page-2/#comment-105270</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2008/01/16/barnum-bailey-davis/#comment-105270</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t know him personally, but you know that he is a &quot;petulant hypocrite?&quot;  That is not &quot;tarnishing&quot; to him?  I am simply suggesting that your harsh condemnation of a man you do not know is inappropriate, unless you happen to be close with Virenque.  I could understand that.  I could also understand if you have some personal anecdotes that would shed him in a different light.  However, I would say that neither of those two things are true, and that you should just quit while you are behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don't know him personally, but you know that he is a "petulant hypocrite?"  That is not "tarnishing" to him?  I am simply suggesting that your harsh condemnation of a man you do not know is inappropriate, unless you happen to be close with Virenque.  I could understand that.  I could also understand if you have some personal anecdotes that would shed him in a different light.  However, I would say that neither of those two things are true, and that you should just quit while you are behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
