<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glad to Be A Renter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2007/11/28/glad-to-be-a-renter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2007/11/28/glad-to-be-a-renter/</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:31:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kaye</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2007/11/28/glad-to-be-a-renter/comment-page-1/#comment-78041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2007/11/28/glad-to-be-a-renter/#comment-78041</guid>
		<description>You might be right on that.  I uploaded a video blog to my site yesterday stating something similar.  While I think your estimates may be a bit over the top, I believe they will fall for at least another year, but only for home prices over $417k.  

The reason?

Banks are no longer lending at 100% purchase price over the $417k price.  While I cannot blame them for the action taking place, it only hurts the homeowners in the category.  For the past 5-8 years buyers have been able to get 100% financing and have not had to pay a down payment.  Now, with the subprime mess they will have to pay 10% down and if they are VERY lucky, only 5%.  Since it has not been historically required for buyers to pay a down payment, the buying pool has not saved up.  Until they do prices will keep falling.  

Which takes me to the next point.  At a $900k house, how long would it take the average purchaser to save $90k?  You tell me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be right on that.  I uploaded a video blog to my site yesterday stating something similar.  While I think your estimates may be a bit over the top, I believe they will fall for at least another year, but only for home prices over $417k.  </p>
<p>The reason?</p>
<p>Banks are no longer lending at 100% purchase price over the $417k price.  While I cannot blame them for the action taking place, it only hurts the homeowners in the category.  For the past 5-8 years buyers have been able to get 100% financing and have not had to pay a down payment.  Now, with the subprime mess they will have to pay 10% down and if they are VERY lucky, only 5%.  Since it has not been historically required for buyers to pay a down payment, the buying pool has not saved up.  Until they do prices will keep falling.  </p>
<p>Which takes me to the next point.  At a $900k house, how long would it take the average purchaser to save $90k?  You tell me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
