<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eyesore of the Week: Columbia Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2007/07/20/eyesore-of-the-week-columbia-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2007/07/20/eyesore-of-the-week-columbia-center/</link>
	<description>D.C. News, Politics, Media, Arts, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:29:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RMD1978</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2007/07/20/eyesore-of-the-week-columbia-center/comment-page-1/#comment-21920</link>
		<dc:creator>RMD1978</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2007/07/20/eyesore-of-the-week-columbia-center/#comment-21920</guid>
		<description>Mark...Nice commentary.  My blog comment is not about the building, but rather about the internet.  It&#039;s nice when people who know absolutely nothing about architecture have a platform for an uneducated stream of consciousness.  By the way, I hope you work in a &quot;more expensive&quot; building that doesn&#039;t include a &quot;cheap&quot; glass and steel facade...P.S. glass and steel facades are really expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark...Nice commentary.  My blog comment is not about the building, but rather about the internet.  It's nice when people who know absolutely nothing about architecture have a platform for an uneducated stream of consciousness.  By the way, I hope you work in a "more expensive" building that doesn't include a "cheap" glass and steel facade...P.S. glass and steel facades are really expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC1974</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2007/07/20/eyesore-of-the-week-columbia-center/comment-page-1/#comment-19964</link>
		<dc:creator>DC1974</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/index.php/2007/07/20/eyesore-of-the-week-columbia-center/#comment-19964</guid>
		<description>Actually I think it&#039;s sort of an elegant solution. And the angles break up what would be just another flat 10 story wall, like much of the rest of downtown. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I save the word eyesore for things that are really bad. Like the faux historical crud being built around Chinatown. More glass and steel please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think it's sort of an elegant solution. And the angles break up what would be just another flat 10 story wall, like much of the rest of downtown. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I save the word eyesore for things that are really bad. Like the faux historical crud being built around Chinatown. More glass and steel please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
