Meet Lt. Roy
From The Lavender Scare by David K. Johnson (University of Chicago Press, 294 pp.):
The caption: “Lieutenant Roy Blick, head of the Washington, D.C., vice squad, oversaw the arrest of hundreds of gay men and lesbians. In March 1950 he told a congressional committee that Washington was home to five thousand homosexuals and estimated that three-quarters of them worked for the federal government. (Courtesy AP/Wide World Photos.)”
26 Responses to “Meet Lt. Roy”
Leave a Reply
Recent Posts
- Sean Taylor’s Officially Fair Game (0
)
On WTEM's "Monday Morning Quarterback" show yesterday, host Andy Pollin led a discussion of Sunday's… - AU Professor Proposes Using Complex Online Scheme to Make D.C. Simple to Understand (0)
Washington, D.C. is a complicated place. Journalists in D.C. bureaus are getting laid off in droves.… - Postcards From Home: Film and Paper Archive (0)
Medical Museum, 1993… - Biking to the Inauguration (0)
Yesterday, Loose Lips Daily linked to San Francisco Bike Blog-- which thinks the Washington Area Bi… - Will The Kerstetter Shooting Spark Reforms With D.C. Police? (0)
On the morning of November 6, two D.C. police officers responded to the home of David Kerstetter. Th…
- Sean Taylor’s Officially Fair Game (0
August 6th, 2006 at 1:12 am
My God, Ramonathan. You are totally OBSESSED with gay sex! It’s always asses, and dicks and insider gay lingo with you. (”rimming?” “Top/Bottom.”? seems you know a bit TOO much.)
No matter what the subject at hand, you always figure out a way to steer the topic to gay sex.
You don’t have to be Freud to figure THAT one out.
August 6th, 2006 at 8:45 am
Rees is not posting that stuff! He has to be back at the state hospital each night at 6 PM.
August 6th, 2006 at 10:22 am
In the news, a prominent Asian lawyer who was married just happened to get killed in the home of a very prominient gay activist.
Smells like a married man in the closet who came over to DC to get porked and lost his life over it.
August 6th, 2006 at 12:26 pm
Still obsessed, eh?
Some advice: Hire yourself a male escort Ramonathan. All that latent homoerotic energy obviously needs an outlet.
August 6th, 2006 at 12:38 pm
Yet another one of Rees’s lies: in the post above, he claims that Luke Wilbur, owner and moderator of DCPages messageboards, “invited Rees to post again on DC Pages his scathing attack on Bob Summersgill”.
On today’s DC Politics board on DCPages, Luke denies this vehemently and writes
“I would never invite a person to slander another person on DCMessageBoards. I would like to know who exactly made that post. Thanks in advance.”
Though I’m guessing he, like the rest of us, already knows who did it.
August 6th, 2006 at 12:48 pm
SAM BROOKS CAUGHT LYING AGAIN ON WTOP AS PART OF A GAY CONSPIRACY
After the Friday night candidates? forum on WTOP, Mark Seagraves and Elissa Silverman made a forum observation and one of them that caught their eye was Sam Brooks? never ending lies about his employment with Adrian Fenty.
First Sam Brooks said he was the campaign manager for Team Fenty before the very first candidates? forum.
At the first candidates? forum, Sam Brooks retracted from that claim and said that he had only worked for Team Fenty for 3 months but did not state what he did.
In the WTOP candidates? forum, Sam Brooks goes back to his original lie and said that he worked for Team Fenty for 9 months.
The reality is, Sam Brooks never worked on Team Fenty but rather he was asked to do some consulting work which he did in les than seven weeks, whereby he received three checks for the work. This fact is well illustrated in the financial reports of Team Fenty at the DC OCF at Page 43.
Why do I make issue of this? Simple. Martin Austermuhle and Bob Summersgill who are my biggest detractors are supporters, or were of Sam Brooks, and on the internet, they went after anybody who dared to question their boy Sam.
Long ago, I told people that MARTIN AUSTERMUHLE was SAM BROOKS? DIRTY TRICKS MAN and I have kept a long string of communications from Austermuhle in defense of Brooks.
Austermuhle and Summersgill have a long string of aliases they use to attack people with.
These two are very good at what they do.
This is why I have had a war with Austermuhle and Summersgill.
These three are behind most of the crap that has disrupted the ward 3 race.
YET, SAM BROOKS IS A CHRONIC LIAR AND HAS BEEN CAUGHT WITH HIS PANTS DOWN ON WTOP! MOST EVERYTHING HE SAID ON WTOP WAS A PRE-MEDITATED LIE!
THE ATTACKS ON THE WARD 3 CANDIDATES HAVE COME FROM THESE THREE BASTARDS AND BROOKS ATTACKED HIMSELF TO GET FREE MEDIA PUBLICITY!
August 6th, 2006 at 12:52 pm
You are completely off your rocker, man.That’s the most twisted, complex and completely ridiculous conspiracy theory you’ve yet created. And Lord knows you’ve created a lot of them since you starting pestering everyone in Blogland.
August 6th, 2006 at 1:02 pm
He’s just looking for attention. His grandiose, paranoid thinking practically requires him to believe that people are somehow intimidated by his greatness, and are thus are thus are out to get him — and that the effort requires a massive and labyrinthine conspiracy. It’s ridiculous to us, but I promise you, he actually believes what he’s written above.
It’s a textbook case. The poor fellow. Someone really should help him. He’s not only hurting other people, he’s making a fool of himself. Seriously: if anyone reading this knows Rees and cares about his well-being, he really does need help. I’m sorry to say it here, but it really needs to be said. He’s in very dangerous psychological territory right now.
August 6th, 2006 at 1:18 pm
Notice how Rees has attempted to sidestep the revelation that he totally lied about Luke Wilbur! Watch…he’ll either continue to ignore it, or respond with one of his famous “what I REALLY meant” statements ;-)
August 6th, 2006 at 1:47 pm
More likely, the little creep will just deny posting it.
August 6th, 2006 at 2:57 pm
Wow, this is great:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ward3dc/message/380?source=1&var=1&l=1
Note the IP address is the same as several posts by “John Fruscianti” aka dc20015.
What a wackjob.
August 6th, 2006 at 4:21 pm
Luke Wilbur in fact invited me to post again with DC Pages but he did not say what I could or could not post.
Yet, nothing is posted by DC Pages now without approval of a moderator so what I posted had to first be approved.
August 6th, 2006 at 4:26 pm
Click on my name and see what Adrian Fenty paid Sam Brooks and for what.
It say fee.
Fenty says that Sam Was never his campaign manager, never worked on his campaign for 9 months like he lied on WTOP about but just did a short term consultant job.
August 6th, 2006 at 4:32 pm
In my years of investigating homos, I learbed that they all have this propensity to lie and believe their own lies. It is a part of the mental illness called homosexiality.
August 6th, 2006 at 4:40 pm
Rees is obviously drunk again.
August 6th, 2006 at 4:41 pm
He’s also lying. Dcpages does not moderate individual posts.
Luke himself has posted that he started ALLOWING Rees to post, until he violates the posting standards again.
Can’t lie your way out of this one Rees. Luke is the last word on his own actions.
Filthy liar.
August 6th, 2006 at 4:43 pm
Ding ding ding!!! Just as predicted, Rees posts “what I really MEANT was”….
:-)
August 6th, 2006 at 4:53 pm
NOt lying. Each time I post, I get a message saying must first be approved by moderator.
August 6th, 2006 at 4:57 pm
Not on DC Pages…you are sucha dumbass, you can’t remember where you are being moderated and where you have free reign.
August 6th, 2006 at 7:16 pm
Luke said he would let me post but all my postings would have to first be approved by a moderator before being posted.
Ask him this in an open posting and see what he says.
August 6th, 2006 at 7:34 pm
SAM BROOKS CAUGHT LYING AGAIN ON WTOP
After the Friday night candidates forum on WTOP, Mark Seagraves and Elissa Silverman made a forum observation and one of them that caught their eye was Sam Brooks never ending lies about his employment with Adrian Fenty.
First Sam Brooks said he was the campaign manager for Team Fenty before the very first candidates’ forum.
At the first candidates’ forum, Sam Brooks retracted from that claim and said that he had only worked for Team Fenty for 3 months but did not state what he did.
In the WTOP candidates’ forum, Sam Brooks goes back to his original lie and said that he worked for Team Fenty for 9 months.
The reality is, Sam Brooks never worked on Team Fenty but rather he was asked to do some consulting work which he did in les than seven weeks, whereby he received three checks for the work. This fact is well illustrated in the financial reports of Team Fenty at the DC OCF at Page 43.
See http:///www.dc2006.net/brooks.pdf
Why do I make issue of this? Simple. Martin Austermuhle and Bob Summersgill who are my biggest detractors are supporters, or were of Sam Brooks, and on the internet, they went after anybody who dared to question their boy Sam.
Long ago, I told people that MARTIN AUSTERMUHLE was SAM BROOKS DIRTY TRICKS MAN and I have kept a long string of communications from Austermuhle in defense of Brooks.
Austermuhle and Summersgill have a long string of aliases they use to attack people with.
These two are very good at what they do.
This is why I have had a war with Austermuhle and Summersgill.
These three are behind most of the crap that has disrupted the ward 3 race.
YET, SAM BROOKS IS A CHRONIC LIAR AND HAS BEEN CAUGHT WITH HIS PANTS DOWN ON WTOP! MOST EVERYTHING HE SAID ON WTOP WAS A PRE-MEDITATED LIE!
THE ATTACKS ON THE WARD 3 CANDIDATES HAVE COME FROM THESE THREE BASTARDS AND BROOKS ATTACKED HIMSELF TO GET FREE MEDIA PUBLICITY!
August 6th, 2006 at 7:38 pm
One of the most widespread, destructive, evil and yet subtle false doctrines today is that God creates some people homosexual (or that homosexuality is a result of some sort of ?psychological? problem). In fact, it is apparent from our contacts with people that most of those who consider themselves ?traditional Catholics? believe that there is nothing sinful in the homosexual orientation, but only in homosexual acts. The truth is that God doesn?t create anyone with a homosexual orientation and that all those who are truly homosexuals (even those who are not engaging in homosexual acts) are possessed by the devil and are in a state of mortal sin. Those who scoff at this statement are simply faithless liberals who don?t want the truth and have no concept of the supernatural world.
Romans 1- ?Because that, when they knew God, they have not glorified him as God, or given thanks; but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened… who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error… they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.?
Romans 1 clearly teaches that because these persons ?worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator? and ?changed the truth of God into a lie? God gave them up to homosexuality, which is described as a SHAMEFUL AFFECTION. Further, Romans 1 clearly teaches that homosexuality is ?against nature,? which means that this orientation is foreign to man?s nature, that is, it is NOT INSTILLED BY GOD!
Men and women are given over to homosexuality for inundating themselves with sins of impurity ? and thereby worshipping the flesh rather than God ? and for this they get possessed by the demon of lust, which takes them over and corrupts their entire orientation. (And they can be cured of this.) People also become homosexuals by engaging in idolatry or by harboring a perverse fascination with human beings over God ? and thereby worshipping the creature rather than the Creator. The fact that all homosexuals are possessed by the devil is corroborated by the fact that most homosexual males can be identified by their effeminate external mannerisms. What explains this? It is obviously the demon?s presence in the person making itself manifest externally ? the external, unnatural mannerisms revealing the internal corruption of the soul.
Isaias 3:9 ? “The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.”
Notice that the prophet Isaias, referring to homosexuals, says that ?they have rewarded evil unto themselves.? This is strikingly similar to Romans 1 above, where St. Paul says that homosexuals have received ?in themselves the recompense [reward] which was due to their error.? The truth that all homosexuals are possessed by the devil is also corroborated by the fact that Society has recently seen an incredible increase in the number of people who consider themselves homosexuals. This is easily explained by the fact that, with the advent and explosion of the internet and other technological means which make access to pornography and impurity easy, millions more people are committing sins of impurity, millions more people are becoming possessed, and countless more are becoming homosexuals. (And, of course, not all who commit mortal sins of impurity become homosexuals, so those who somehow think they are okay because they are not homosexuals, even though they are committing sins of impurity, are sorely deceived and are also on the road to hell and in bondage to the devil.)
But today all we hear from ?Catholics? and almost all ?traditional Catholics? is that homosexual acts are wrong, but that the homosexual orientation is okay ? i.e., it is not their fault that they are homosexual. This is falsehood which advances the cause of the devil and does no favor to the homosexuals themselves. It is this very heresy ? that there is nothing wrong with the homosexual orientation ? which is responsible for the fact that: 1) Novus Ordo Seminaries are spilling over with homosexuals; 2) Homosexuals have gained such an ascendancy in Society that their lifestyles and ?homosexual persons? are accepted on mainstream television; 3) Gay ?marriage? may become a reality. If the truth that all homosexuals are possessed ? and that homosexuality is a result of grave sin ? had not been compromised by those who profess to be ?Catholics,? none of this would have happened. It should also be noted that people who become homosexuals at a very young age are simply possessed by the devil early on in life.
Homosexuality is condemned throughout the Bible. Sodomy is one of the sins that cries to heaven for vengeance, and God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for this very sin.
Jude 1:7 -?As Sodom and Gomorrah, and the neighboring cities, in like manner, having given themselves to fornication, and going after strange flesh, were made an example, suffering the punishment of eternal fire.?
Leviticus 18:22, “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.”
Leviticus 20:13, “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”
Deuteronomy 23:17, “There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.”
1 Kings 14:24, “And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel.”
1 Kings 15:11-12, “And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, as did David his father. And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made.”
So when we see the acceptance and promotion of homosexuality rampant among the Vatican II sect members, know that they are accepting and promoting an abomination. When we see them tolerating and even celebrating the homosexual orientation in persons not practicing homosexual acts, know that they are tolerating and celebrating demonic possession.
Vatican ?Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith? on Homosexual Unions: ?Sacred Scripture condemns homosexual acts ?as a serious depravity… (cf. Rom 1:24-27; 1 Cor 6:10; 1 Tim 1:10). This judgment of Scripture does not of course permit us to conclude that all those who suffer from this anomaly are personally responsible for it, but it does attest to the fact that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered?. This same moral judgment is found in many Christian writers of the first centuries and is unanimously accepted by Catholic Tradition.? (Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons, approved by John Paul II March 28, 2003)
Here we see an official Vatican document asserting that homosexual acts are wrong, but that the homosexual orientation is not necessarily a result of grave sin. This is evil, uncharitable and false. And this toleration of the homosexual orientation is the reason why homosexuals are admitted into Novus Ordo Seminaries, and therefore, it is the reason why we ultimately read the following incredible things about the state of the Novus Ordo Seminaries:
?According to former [Novus Ordo] seminarians and recently ordained priests, this ?gay subculture? is so prominent at certain seminaries that these institutions have earned nicknames such as Notre Flame (for Notre Dame Seminary in New Orleans) and Theological Closet (for Theological College at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C.). St. Mary?s Seminary in Baltimore has earned the nickname ?Pink Palace.?
?Father Andrew Walter, ordained [sic] for the Diocese of Bridgeport, Connecticut, in 2000, spent several semesters at the Baltimore school as a seminarian for the Diocese of Paterson, New Jersey. The problem was so bad when he was there, he explained, that ?some of the students and faculty used to get dressed up in leather to go to ?the block,? Baltimore?s equivalent to 42nd Street in Manhattan.? Seminarians, sometimes accompanied by faculty members, would do this regularly, Walter explained. ?They would meet in the foyer, and then head for the gay bars.? (Michael Rose, Goodbye, Good Men, Washington, D.C., Regnery Publishing, pp. 56-57)
?Trigilio lamented, hinting at the campy subculture that permeated the seminary atmosphere. ?We used to say, if you wore a cassock you were a reactionary ?daughter of Trent.? If you wore women?s underwear, they?d make you seminarian of the year. We had a few guys who sometimes wore women?s clothing, lingerie, makeup, etc., and some who were as effeminate as could be? The campy ones at MIS [Mary Immaculate Seminary, Northampton, P.A.] would call each other by female names?? (Michael Rose, Goodbye, Good Men, Washington, D.C., Regnery Publishing, p. 171)
I could go on, but at some point I hope to write a book review of Goodbye, Good Men, a book which exposes the absolutely unbelievable state of the Seminaries of the Vatican II/Novus Ordo sect of Antipope John Paul II.
1 Corinthians 6:9-11, “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.”
By telling homosexuals the truth and not lying to them that their perverse orientation is natural, we do them a great charity and show a true love for their souls, and we give them the knowledge and the means to cure themselves. And they don?t need an exorcism to cure themselves. If a homosexual ceases to commit all mortal sins and changes his or her life; and if he or she holds the fullness of the deposit of Catholic Faith without compromise; and if he or she makes a sincere sacramental confession of all mortal sins to a validly ordained priest; and if he or she has a strong prayer life and a true devotion to Our Lady and the holy Rosary, then he or she will be delivered from homosexuality without any doubt. Our Lord tells us that: ?And you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.? (John 8:32) By knowing the truth and by employing the means to deliver themselves, homosexuals can and will be delivered from their perverse orientation.
Regarding the Holy Rosary, the real Sister Lucia told Father Fuentes in a famous 1957 interview:
“Look, Father, the Most Holy Virgin in these last times in which we live has given a new efficacy to the recitation of the Holy Rosary. She has given this efficacy to such an extent that there is no problem, no matter how difficult it is, whether temporal or above all, spiritual, in the personal life of each one of us, of our families, of the families of the world, or of the religious communities, or even of the life of peoples and nations that cannot be solved by the Rosary. There is no problem I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we cannot resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary. With the Holy Rosary, we will save ourselves. We will sanctify ourselves. We will console Our Lord and obtain the salvation of many souls.”
August 6th, 2006 at 7:55 pm
You? Quoting the Bible? And presuming to speak for what’s good and true?
THAT, sir, is a TRUE abomination.
August 6th, 2006 at 7:56 pm
Do you keep Kosher Rees? Do you ever wear more than one kind of fabric at the same time? Do you eat seafood? Do you believe in stoning unfaithful wives to death?
Because THAT appears in the Old Testament too.
Hypocrite.
August 6th, 2006 at 8:21 pm
I’m sure the folks at the Holy Family Monastery will be pleased to find that you’ve plagiarized themL
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/does_God_create_homosexuals.html
August 23rd, 2007 at 12:07 am
I always wondered who was pretending to be me. Yet, it was all amusing.