If I Were Still Reading Rolling Stone, I’d Know What This Is About
From an e-mail titled “an open letter to rolling stone” by publicist Maggie Vail:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
We, the undersigned independent record labels, wish to share our indignation regarding Rolling Stone’s November 15th pull out editorial, which featured the names of our artists in conjunction with an ad for Camel cigarettes. This editorial cartoon gives every impression of being part and parcel of the advertisement wrapped around it.
The use of an artist’s name to promote a brand or product should be done only with the artist’s explicit consent, something that was neither solicited nor obtained from the labels or bands.
When questioned, Rolling Stone has referred to the “Indie Rock Universe” pull out section as an “editorial”, but it hardly seems accidental that this editorial content is wrapped in a giant ad from R.J. Reynolds announcing their support for independent artists and labels. The idea that this was a coincidence in any way seems dubious at best. There are two other pull out sections in this same issue of Rolling Stone. Both are wrapped in advertising, but neither of these ads could be construed as part of the editorial content within.
Many of the bands named, and the labels that represent them, are very unhappy with the implication that they have any involvement with R.J. Reynolds and Camel cigarettes. We ask that Rolling Stone apologize for blurring the line between editorial and advertisement, and in doing so, implying that the bands named support the product being advertised.
Sincerely, Kill Rock Stars, Touch and Go, Skin Graft, Lovepump United, Lucky Madison, 5RC, Audio Dregs, and Fryk Beat.
Maggie Vail
Kill Rock Stars


)




December 13th, 2007 at 4:27 pm
This is actually a halfway decent story. A lot of Philly bands were in that Camel ad too, but so far I’m not sure any of them have actually protested. It was a bit weird standing at the Dino Jr./Dr. Dog show in Philly, with Camel cig ads all around, in a NONSMOKING venue. Tards.
December 14th, 2007 at 12:49 pm
Idolator.com and others have written about this controversial insert as well. Isn’t it time for that Mike guy to post some silly claim that we need more bands endorsing smoking, just like in the good ol’ days, and that this is all Fugazi’s fault.
December 14th, 2007 at 1:35 pm
I stopped reading Rolling Stones a long time ago. This is nothing but the Tobacco company seeking new customers and the magazine was happy to help. Did they ask any of them did they buy the product. If not, they did a major disservice to the indie music scene!
December 14th, 2007 at 2:20 pm
I’ve been taking a little break from the Gawker universe. I suppose that’s one of the reasons I didn’t see anything about this until now.