Comments on: The Sartorialist Will Not Be Impressed by Your Outfit Tonight

By: Agnieszka

Agnieszka — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:09:19 +0000

Hi!. Thanks a bunch for the info. I've been digging around for info, but there is so much out there. Google lead me here - good for you i guess! Keep up the great information. I will be coming back over here in a few days to see if there is any more info.

By: Still unimpressed with this writer

Still unimpressed with this writer — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:52:44 +0000

This is shoddy, lazy coverage that doesn't inform or or impress, but rather serves as a forum for revealing how clever the writer is. Ms. Judkis is in a privileged position: cleverness has always been her wont, if not her forte. But she isn't the better journalist for it. (Also, her abundance of colons is another example of slatternly writing.)

Perhaps she could stand to take her own adopted watchwords: (see - aren't colons indulgent?) Before she leaves the computer, she should look at the screen and edit.

That is the moral of the art and style world according to Ms. Judkis, after all - isn't it?

By: Hyman

Hyman — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:32:00 +0000

Dc is filled with lawyers, Non-profit workers,bureaucrats it will always be lame. A city of lame-o's.

By: Adolf

Adolf — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:15:49 +0000

Commenter above sounds like the story hit too close to home. Perhaps he was one of the over accessorized hipsters in attendance at the last Sartorialist event?

By: M.B.

M.B. — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:06:09 +0000

This writer has a chip on her shoulder. I bet it is her dream to be on his blog and I also bet it is her dream to write for a real newspaper.