Arts Desk

Shakespeare’s R&J at Signature Theatre, Reviewed

Alex Mills, left, and Jefferson Farber

The less theater you’ve seen in D.C. in recent years, the fresher you may find Shakespeare’s R&J, Joe Calarco’s four-man retelling of the Bard’s tragedy—set not in ancient fair Verona but in the halls of a Catholic boarding school, where a quartet of male students mounts the play late at night, playing all the parts. When R&J debuted in New York in 1997, the show may have seemed electrically illicit. But since then, nine states have legalized gay marriage. Pope Benedict has come and gone in a puff of white smoke. This is not to say the fight for equal rights is over, but when it comes to reinterpreting Shakespeare, R&J now seems nostalgic, almost quaint.

That’s not to sell short the four young men who are now exhausting themselves on Signature Theatre’s stage each night. But by its nature R&J is a reminder of how spoiled Washington audiences are when it comes to experimental Shakespeare. Theatergoers who saw Synetic’s wordless version of Romeo and Juliet—either in 2008 or as remounted last year—will not forget the breathtaking silhouettes of star-crossed lovers making love behind a rippling sheet. Upstart troupe Taffety Punk didn’t blink before staging an all-female Much Ado About Nothing, and each summer, various Fringe ensembles explore oddball Elizabethan scenarios. At Shakespeare Theatre Company, Ethan McSweeny’s elaborate design schemes are sometimes critiqued as misguided, but if you’ve got the production budget, creating a world beyond Shakespeare’s words often provides an easier point of access for a 21st century audience.

By comparison, Calarco’s production gender-bending, text-only production seems tame, and even a little dry. Few props are used in this two-hour traffic of a bare wooden stage: Just two chairs, a chest, a handful of flashlights, a long red tablecloth, and the players’ unspoken fear of forbidden love. Alex Mills, perhaps best known as the hyperflexible Puck of Synetic’s 2009 A Midsummer Night’s Dream, plays Romeo, shaking with angst from the opening of the show, when he appears scribbling love letters in a composition book. He’s soon joined by three more blazer-clad fellows, who pry loose a few planks in the stage and pull out hardbound copy of the forbidden tragedy, swaddled in scarlet fabric.

The men never stop to have a let’s-put-on-a-play discussion. They just act, with frenetic intensity. Occasionally, one hollers out a scene by number, or set. “Juliet’s Bedchamber!” announces one, before Rex Daugherty and Joel David Santner launch into campy falsetto as the nurse and mother. When Jefferson Farber, as Juliet, calls out “How now?” in baritone, Santner and Daugherty stop and stare before proceeding in their normal voices. Later, they rip a page from the play after Friar Lawrence declares the lovers man and wife, and turn away when Mills and Farber smooch loudly in their marital bower.

When the two lovers lay down again, this time felled by poison and dagger, R&J isn’t over. For three of the four young men, there are uniform vests to don and ties to tie. Mills’ character refuses to believe, as his classmates tell him, that it was all a dream. In defiance, he climbs to the balcony and goes all Robert Sean Leonard on us. It’s a rather overwrought ending, complete with recorded, Enya-esque vocals.

For audiences who haven’t seen or read Romeo and Juliet in a while, or who long ago wrote the play off as a paean to heterosexual virility, R&J may well offer some revelations. For the rest of us, there is Synetic’s upcoming wordless production of The Tempest, or the DVD of Dead Poet’s Society.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
  • Pingback: What the critics are saying - roundup of the latest reviews

  • Jim Hiscott

    I have lived in DC since 1983. I have seen plenty of theater in this town in the meantime, though probably not nearly enough as the jaded reviewer. As a 60 year old I have seen plenty of things in this life to make even me a cynic in these times. And, as a graphic designer I have an greater appreciation for the arts in general, compared to the average person. I say Shakespeare's R&J at the Folger in 2000 and was riveted. Was it because I am gay and it was novel seeing four guys in a show—and—wait for the drum roll—kissing? I doubt it, though it was a part of it given how novel it was then. However, the critic misses the point that it is less novel today. This country still has a hang-up about male masculinity let alone two males kissing in public no matter if we live in enlightened Washington. To say otherwise missed the point entirely.

    Seeing R&J, again 13 years later, Thursday evening at Signature I found this production one of the most stunning and authentic productions I have seen in Washington, probably since, ironically, Spring Awakening. Very few shows, though very good and enjoyable, I find transcendent, and I count this new production one of those. Perhaps I have seen enough theater in my life, from seeing Al Pacino in 'The Basic Training of Pavel Hummel' while in college at Boston University in the early 70s, to 'Angels in America' and 'Hairspray' in New York, 'Urinetown' and 'Assassins' at Signature, and 'Sunday in the Park with George' during the Sondheim Festival at the Kennedy Center that I now find far too many productions overproduced and overdramatized to be so obvious in their theatricality. In this production, I found one that felt, to me at least, truly authentic in having created its own time and place apart from knowing that I was watching a play. It was transformative. The choices of staging, lighting, and set design was inspired and purposeful in its beautiful simplicity. As a practicing designer for over 30 years I have truly come to believe that less is more, even if it's just two chairs and a chest on stage to act as props. Oh, and a red cloth. It was a stunning production brought to life by four superb actors, especially actors so young.

    While we each are entitled to our own opinions, I found your review condescending, patronizing, cynical, and ignorant.