<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arts Desk &#187; Jim O&#8217;Rourke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/tag/jim-orourke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk</link>
	<description>News and Criticism on D.C. and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Music in Review: Idolating Pitchfork in Maura Johnson&#8217;s Absence</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/12/21/music-in-review-idolating-pitchfork-in-maura-johnsons-absense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/12/21/music-in-review-idolating-pitchfork-in-maura-johnsons-absense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Siblo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indie Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Music In Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of the Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idolator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim O'Rourke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maura Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitchfork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The xx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/?p=15392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
After reading my critique of Pitchfork’s  P2K: The Decade in Music list in City Paper's Music in Review issue, a friend commented that “sometimes  I don't know what's more cliché: reading Pitchfork or complaining about  Pitchfork.” Reductionist arguments like that are easy swipes, but they speak to the incessant griping, legitimate or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-15400" title="pitchforklolz" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/files/2009/12/pitchforklolz1.jpg" alt="pitchforklolz" width="407" height="194" /></p>
<p>After reading <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=38235" >my critique</a> of <strong>Pitchfork</strong>’s  <a href="http://pitchfork.com/p2k/" >P2K: The Decade in Music</a> list in <em>City Paper</em>'s Music in Review issue, a friend commented that “sometimes  I don't know what's more cliché: reading Pitchfork or complaining about  Pitchfork.” Reductionist arguments like that are easy swipes, but they speak to the incessant griping, legitimate or not, to which Pitchfork’s  every move is constantly subjected. If you feel that nitpicking Pitchfork’s  interminable lists is just as futile as creating them, reading after  the jump might not be such a hot idea.</p>
<p><span id="more-15392"></span>In a year that saw the shuttering of numerous print publications, one of the Web’s biggest woes was  <strong>Maura Johnson</strong>’s departure from <a href="http://idolator.com/" ><strong>Idolator</strong></a>, the once-mighty music blog  that, in her absence, has gone straight to <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/11/24/how-to-chart-idolators-decline-look-at-its-revisions" ><em>US Weekly</em>-like hell</a>. The site, once balancing thoughtful  coverage of all things indie with equally thoughtful <em>American Idol </em>rundowns,  has given into its weaker impulses and become a breathy, exhalation  of celeb news, with lolcat critiques of <strong>Lady Gaga</strong>’s outfits and <strong>Chris Brown</strong>’s Twitter trends. I’ve decided to  pay humble tribute to Johnson by examining Pitchfork’s <a href="http://pitchfork.com/features/staff-lists/7744-the-top-50-albums-of-2009/" >Top 50 Albums of 2009</a> using her old rundown format&#8212;<a href="http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list" >the Good, the Bad, and the Whaaa?</a>&#8212;a feature that now  seems like a distant memory buried beneath countless pages dedicated  to Rihanna’s latest haircut.</p>
<p><strong>The Good:</strong> In a year when most lists  culled from familiar major players, Pitchfork allows for some genuine  surprises, including deserving nods to worthwhile mainstays like <strong>Jim  O’Rourke</strong> and <strong>Dinosaur Jr.</strong> and understated favorites like <strong>Bill Callahan </strong>and <strong>Fuck Buttons </strong>while not throwing this year’s worthy newcomers under  the bus (<strong>Japandroids</strong>, <strong>Neon Indian</strong>, the <strong>Pains of Being Pure at Heart</strong>).  It thankfully also acknowledged that <strong>Cymbals Eat Guitars</strong>, just barely coming in  at No. 43, needed some time to ripen.</p>
<p><strong>The Bad:</strong> Outside of the tensionless  reveal of its No. 1 pick (hey, did you know <strong>Animal Collective</strong> put out  an album this year?), this year’s ranking was more consistent with  the site’s obvious preferences than in the past. Depending upon  your perspective. that's either comforting or maddening. Out of the  40-plus Best New Music designations given, only six of these albums failed  to chart (<strong>YACHT</strong>, <strong>Isis</strong>, <strong>Volcano Choir</strong>, <strong>Camera Obscura</strong>, <strong>Wavves</strong>, and <strong>Sunset  Rubdown</strong>).  In other news, <strong>Future of the Left </strong>received a lowly honorable  mention that reinforced, even in the wake of the collective ball-dropping  of its former outfit <strong>McLusky</strong>, that the band is destined for relegation to the  indie-rock fringes. The list also continues the trend of semiapologizing with the site's love for <strong>Passion Pit </strong>(“Passion Pit's debut  album can seem to come on like a big, friendly dog slobbering you with  kisses: one part "Eww, too much!" and two parts "Aww,  I can't resist!"), as though the band were a socially awkward sibling  it feels compelled to invite to parties. And considering <strong>Phoenix</strong>’s  ubiquitous Pitchfork presence, its squeaking into the Top 10 at No. 8 rings false.</p>
<p><strong>The Whaaa?: </strong>Pitchfork’s Top 10 is  rarely surprising, but this year’s had a few unexpected notes. <strong>Bat  for Lashes </strong>turned out to be a sleeper favorite while the biggest surprise  came with the unabashed appreciation for the <strong>xx</strong>, who took the No.3 spot. Who knew the band’s song(s) were so beloved? I smell a pug-induced  slice of snark when its <a href="http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/11617-partie-traumatic/" >follow-up album tanks</a>.</p>
<p>And if this list does nothing else,  let it be a lesson to all lo-fi wunderkinds who are thinking of taking  some drugs and breaking down at a big European festival&#8212;if you embarrass  the Web site’s good name, your name <a href="http://pitchfork.com/news/35459-wavves-self-destruct-in-barcelona" >will quickly turn to mud</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/12/21/music-in-review-idolating-pitchfork-in-maura-johnsons-absense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has the Pushback Begun?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/09/08/has-the-pushback-begun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/09/08/has-the-pushback-begun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Burton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indie Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Ratliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim O'Rourke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Visitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vinyl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/?p=9779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
On Sunday, the New York Times ran an article about Jim O'Rourke, an underground overachiever who, in addition to recording his own solo music, has played in Sonic Youth and Gastr Del Sol, and worked in various other capacities with Wilco, Joanna Newsom, and Superchunk.
His latest project is the new solo album The Visitor, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9786" title="orourke_opt" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/files/2009/09/orourke_opt.jpg" alt="orourke_opt" width="267" height="400" /></p>
<p>On Sunday, the <em>New York Times </em>ran an article about <strong>Jim O'Rourke</strong>, an underground overachiever who, in addition to recording his own solo music, has played in <strong>Sonic Youth </strong>and <strong>Gastr Del Sol</strong>, and worked in various other capacities with <strong>Wilco</strong>, <strong>Joanna Newsom</strong>, and <strong>Superchunk</strong>.</p>
<p>His latest project is the new solo album <em>The Visitor</em>, a recording that, at times, features as many as 200 tracks of instruments.</p>
<p>As one might imagine, <a href="http://www.dragcity.com/products/the-visitor">an album such as this </a>would require quite an intricate mix, which is perhaps why <em>The Visitor </em>will only be available on CD and vinyl—no digital download.</p>
<p><span id="more-9779"></span>Here's part of the <strong>Ben Ratliff </strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/arts/music/06ratl.html?_r=1&amp;ref=music&amp;pagewanted=print">article</a> from <em>NYT</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>He’s taking a stand against the sound quality of MP3s; he’s also taking a stand in favor of artists being able to control the medium and reception of their work.</p>
<p>“You can no longer use context as part of your work,” he said, glumly, “because it doesn’t matter what you do, somebody’s going to change the context of it. The confusion of creativity, making something, with this Internet idea of democratization ...” he trailed off, disgusted. “It sounds like old-man stuff, but I think it’s disastrous for the possibilities of any art form.”</p></blockquote>
<p>He's not the first artist to attempt a <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36617">download pushback</a>. But is he a part of the vanguard or a dying breed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/09/08/has-the-pushback-begun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday Rock City: Jim O&#8217;Rourke</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/05/12/tuesday-rock-city-jim-orourke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/05/12/tuesday-rock-city-jim-orourke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Leitko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim O'Rourke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuesday Rock City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/?p=6259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Jim O'Rourke: I'm Happy, And I'm Singing, And A 1,2,3,4 (Expanded Edition)
From his collaborations with Sonic Youth, to his abstract guitar improvisations, to his seemingly bottomless catalog of drone compositions, Jim O'Rourke has made a lot of records. However, if one were to name the quintessential O'Rourke LP, it would have to be I'm Happy, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/files/2009/05/emego50.jpg"><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/files/2009/05/emego50-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Print" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-6288" /></a><br />
<strong>Jim O'Rourke</strong>: <em>I'm Happy, And I'm Singing, And A 1,2,3,4 (Expanded Edition)</em></p>
<p>From his collaborations with Sonic Youth, to his abstract guitar improvisations, to his seemingly bottomless catalog of drone compositions, Jim O'Rourke has made a lot of records. However, if one were to name the quintessential O'Rourke LP, it would have to be <em>I'm Happy, I'm Singing, And A 1,2,3,4</em>. Originally released in 2001 by the Austrian electronic label Mego, "I'm Happy" was O'Rourke's attempt at solo laptop composition, using an array of max/msp patches to generate heavilly textured compositions in the style of Brian Eno's <em>Discreet Music</em>. But every major O'Rourke calling card is here&#8211;from his preferred instruments (acoustic guitar and accordion), to influences, to the music concrete-style trickery (are those strings, or synthesizers, or both?) that he employed so effectively on earlier compositions like <em>Tamper</em>. But what's most striking is O'Rourke's use of melody. </p>
<p>Laptop music at the time&#8211;and especially among his peers on the Mego label&#8211;was an extremely noisy pursuit. At the time, to listen to a record by Pita, the alias of Mego founder Peter Rheberg, was like plugging a dial-up modem into a marshal stack and sticking your head in front of the speaker cone. On <em>I'm Happy, And I'm Singing, And A 1,2,3,4</em>, O'Rourke brought a more directly musical sensibility to laptop music&#8211;he swept out the noise, and instead, concentrated on manipulating simple and harmonious sounds.<br />
<span id="more-6259"></span><br />
The record's first track "I'm Happy" dices up organ and accordion figures, creating a blurry digital update of Terry Riley's organ/tape piece "Poppy Nogood &#038; the Phanton Band." The final track, the somber 21-minute "And A 1,2,3,4," uses string section samples of varying length to create a gradually shifting drone somewhat similar in spirit to Gavin Bryar's "Sinking of the Titanic." But O'Rourke's voice is so present here that it's easy to hear elements of "I'm Happy, And I'm Sining, And A 1,2,3,4" popping up in his other work, even with rock bands like Sonic Youth (Murray Street's "Karen Revisited") or Wilco (A Ghost is Born's "Less Than You Think). Not just in the noisy parts, either. </p>
<p>This recent repressing, by Editions Mego, brings the album back into print for the first time in years with new cover art and a second disc of unreleased material. That new material is largely inessential&#8211;noisy asides that lack the coherence of the record's original tracks. But those three compositions hold up remarkably well, and listening to them again, you can hear how their influence has come to bear on numerous contemporary records, in both the pop and electronic worlds. Most of all, it sums up what O'Rourke's other work always suggested&#8211;that technology and musicality are not mutually exclusive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/05/12/tuesday-rock-city-jim-orourke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

