<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arts Desk &#187; Gawker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/tag/gawker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk</link>
	<description>News and Criticism on D.C. and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Is America&#8217;s Best Political Subdivision (By Default)</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/general/2011/08/30/d-c-is-americas-best-political-subdivision-by-default/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/general/2011/08/30/d-c-is-americas-best-political-subdivision-by-default/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin R. Freed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. statehood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/?p=54065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America! Who needs it? It's merely an insane collection of 50 divergent personalities who like to send their biggest blowhards to our city in vain attempts to transform the rest of the country into something that looks more like their backwater locales. (Do we really want to live in a world lorded by the principles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-54323" href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/general/2011/08/30/d-c-is-americas-best-political-subdivision-by-default/skyline/"><img class="size-full wp-image-54323 aligncenter" style="margin-top: 8px; margin-bottom: 8px;" title="SKYline" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/files/2011/08/dc-skyline-darrow-montgomery.jpg" alt="DC Skyline by Darrow Montgomery" width="452" height="300" /></a>America! Who needs it? It's merely an insane collection of 50 divergent personalities who like to send their biggest blowhards to our city in vain attempts to transform the rest of the country into something that looks more like their backwater locales. (Do we really want to live in a world lorded by the principles of places like Frog Jump, Tenn. or Albany, N.Y.?) Which state is best? Which is the worst? Gawker bravely stepped up to the challenge last week in an attempt to define the "Worst 50 States in America."</p>
<p>In other words, everywhere you go around this great, big nation of ours, it's going to suck at least a little.</p>
<p>Except here!</p>
<p>That's right, with all the votes tallied&#8212;<a href="http://gawker.com/5831724/the-worst-50-states-in-america?tag=50-states" >New York, thankfully, came out looking best (or maybe least bad)</a>&#8212;it appears that Gawker has inadvertently declared D.C. the best place in the country. In this case our lack of statehood spared us from Gawker's snarky judgment. That's a bit of a relief&#8212;the gossip site's editors certainly could have run wild with, say, our wacky city government, woeful sports teams, glut of overactive interns, rampant gentrification, and sometimes questionable creative class. In 2009, then-Gawker editor <strong>Alex Pareene </strong>tried to make the case D.C. would <a href="http://gawker.com/5153483/cheer-up-dc-will-never-be-cool" >"never be cool</a>," hinging most of his argument on the fact that after the excitement of the Dischord era, all that remained was "uh, <strong>Ian Svenonius</strong> (the Sassiest Boy in America!)." <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/40532/bruise-cruise/" >And this was before Svenonius became a cruise director</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-54065"></span>But, no statehood means we can't be judged as one of the country's worst states in Gawker's recent round of America-bashing. Still, it's a little unfair. The District might not have Congressional representation, but we're still on the mainland and still have as many votes in the Electoral College as Vermont (No. 47), North Dakota (No. 20), Wyoming (No. 19), Montana (No. 18), South Dakota (No. 16), and Alaska (No. 11). It's not like D.C. is some distant protectorate. It makes one speculate where D.C. might have landed on Gawker's list.</p>
<p>Setting aside Pareene's outdated Washington-bashing, we probably would have been somewhere in the middle considering the placement of other mid-Atlantic states. (The list was, predictably for something written by a bunch of Internet snobs, tilted toward the Northeast and Pacific Northwest.) <a href="http://gawker.com/5832471/the-worst-50-states-in-america-day-2" >Virginia came in at No. 39</a>, though largely on the back of someone at Gawker headquarters having a soft spot for Arlington, <a href="http://gawker.com/5833171/the-worst-50-states-in-america-day-3" >while Maryland fared slightly worse at No. 33</a>&#8212;crab cakes and <em>The Wire</em> good, <em>The Blair Witch Project</em> and inner-city Baltimore bad. Further out, Pennsylvania and North Carolina both finished in the 30s, though Delaware came in as the <a href="http://gawker.com/5834410/the-worst-50-states-in-america-day-6" >sixth-worst state</a>. Still, if D.C. were arbitrarily assigned the average of its immediate neighbors, coming in 36th would have us bumping off Illinois.</p>
<p>But we'll never know, will we? Discarded because of a centuries-old constitutional oversight, the District of Columbia trumps the 50 states in Gawker's silly, self-congratulatory geographic rankings. A list of the "Worst 50 States in America"? Put us down at No. 51, with an asterisk.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Darrow Montgomery</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/general/2011/08/30/d-c-is-americas-best-political-subdivision-by-default/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker Users Really Love Fugazi</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2010/12/13/gawker-users-really-love-d-c-hardcore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2010/12/13/gawker-users-really-love-d-c-hardcore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan L. Fischer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BitTorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fugazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking Coughs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/?p=37125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You probably read that Gawker, the snarky Manhattan media/gossip site that everyone reads, was hacked over the weekend, and the passwords of many, many users were compromised.
Apparently whatever security the site had in place posed only a (wait for it) minor threat to the offenders, who disseminated a file containing some of the decrypted passwords [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably read that Gawker, the snarky Manhattan media/gossip site that everyone reads, was <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5712785/" >hacked over the weekend</a>, and the passwords of many, many users were compromised.</p>
<p>Apparently whatever security the site had in place posed only a (wait for it) minor threat to the offenders, who disseminated a file containing some of the decrypted passwords via BitTorrent. One of my colleagues looked at the file, and guess what? At least 25 Gawker users have the password "Fugazi." Um, D.C. represent?</p>
<p>Change your passwords, hardcore fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2010/12/13/gawker-users-really-love-d-c-hardcore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker: You&#8217;re Not That Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/02/16/gawker-youre-not-that-cool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/02/16/gawker-youre-not-that-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cherkis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Go-Go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. not being cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junkyard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/?p=3862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCist rightfully snarked on Gawker's snarking about how D.C. is not cool. The Gawker rant, "Cheer Up, DC Will Never Bo Cool," just isn't serious enough to merit much attention.
But this point was sorta dead on:
"Sure, 30 years ago DC had Bad Brains and Minor Threat, and today it still has, uh, Ian Svenonius (the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DCist</strong> <a href=" http://dcist.com/2009/02/gawker_thinks_we_all_suck.php">rightfully snarked</a> on <strong>Gawker</strong>'s snarking about how D.C. is not cool. The Gawker rant, "<a href=" http://gawker.com/5153483/cheer-up-dc-will-never-be-cool">Cheer Up, DC Will Never Bo Cool</a>," just isn't serious enough to merit much attention.</p>
<p>But this point was sorta dead on:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Sure, 30 years ago DC had Bad Brains and Minor Threat, and today it still has, uh, Ian Svenonius (the Sassiest Boy in America!), but the intervening years have gentrified the hell out of a quarter of the city proper and kept the rest in abject urban poverty, more or less. Not a great recipe for 'cool'!"</p></blockquote>
<p>Except, last time I checked New York was gentrifying the hell out of its grid. The last time I checked, the most influential band in Brooklyn doesn't reside there. No, that band's early albums were put out by a <a href="  http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/bestof/2008/artsandentertainment/show.php?id=35298">guy who lives in D.C</a>. and its members grew up around here. That band is called <a href=" http://www.myspace.com/animalcollectivetheband">Animal Collective</a>. We <a href=" http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=36719">really like Animal Collective</a>.</p>
<p>I dig the writer's interest in fighting economic inequality. But if the writer really cared about "abject urban poverty," what the hell is he doing blogging for Gawker? It's not like that job really sticks it to the Man. I might be wrong, but <a href=" http://gawker.com/5154053/wintour-to-reporter-this-garment-would-never-fit-you">Gawker hasn't exactly turned into Human Rights Watch</a> or hired <a href=" http://www.sudhirvenkatesh.org/books">a renowned sociologist</a> to write engaging narratives about urban poverty.</p>
<p><span id="more-3862"></span></p>
<p>And New York didn't invent go-go. I'm shocked the writer didn't at least give it a mention! Anyway, all this ranting is just an excuse to post this <strong>Junkyard</strong> video from 1985. I discovered this video at the Smithsonian's <a href=" http://anacostia.si.edu/">Anacostia Community Museum</a> (which <a href=" http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/07/07/one-for-the-suggestion-box/">I sort of critiqued a while ago</a>).</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sFKYXZtHtM8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sFKYXZtHtM8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/02/16/gawker-youre-not-that-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

