<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arts Desk &#187; Criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/tag/criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk</link>
	<description>News and Criticism on D.C. and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:24:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Criticism &#8216;09</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/07/02/criticism-09/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/07/02/criticism-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Burton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. Freedom du Lac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/?p=7773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apropos of nothing, a former Washington Post classical writer and a current Washington Post pop writer recently weighed in on the meaning of music criticism. J. Freedom du Lac claims that influence is no longer a widespread possibility—and hasn’t been since the era of Boston—but that it’s still possible put a subject under a new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apropos of nothing, a former <em>Washington Post </em>classical writer and a current <em>Washington Post </em>pop writer recently weighed in on the meaning of music criticism. <strong>J. Freedom du Lac</strong> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR2009063004073.html?sub=AR">claims that influence is no longer a widespread possibility</a>—and hasn’t been since the era of <strong>Boston</strong>—but that it’s still possible put a subject under a new light. And <strong>Tim Page </strong><a href="http://www.metoperafamily.org/operanews/issue/article.aspx?id=5254&amp;issueID=335">argues for professional criticism as a bulwark against factual errors and unnecessary meanness</a>. Both are worth reading if only because, while technology has no doubt changed the pursuit (see: blogs and MP3s) and made it more difficult to do it professionally, music criticism predates recorded sound and will probably outlast its current low ebb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/07/02/criticism-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
