<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pitchfork Shoots Barrelled Fish W/Elephant Gun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/11/05/pitchfork-shoots-barrelled-fish-welephant-gun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/11/05/pitchfork-shoots-barrelled-fish-welephant-gun/</link>
	<description>News and Criticism on D.C. and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:17:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Riggs</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/11/05/pitchfork-shoots-barrelled-fish-welephant-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-35911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/?p=13109#comment-35911</guid>
		<description>Hey Leor: The conversation about emo came up when Scott and I were seated next to each other at the Future of Music Coalition&#039;s journalism panel. Scott basically said that Pitchfork saw a clear delineation between &quot;good&quot; late 90s/early 2000s emo, and the crummy shit that rode on its coattails, which (I&#039;m guessing) he would call the Hot Topic wave of emo: My Chemical Romance, The Used, etc. 

Oddly enough, Pitchfork reviewed Brand New&#039;s second album, but refused to review &lt;em&gt;Daisy&lt;/em&gt;, even though Scott said that there was some pull for it at Pitchfork. 

I included that anecdote because I think it illustrates a weakness in letting buzz/trendiness and indie thinking set the standards. I would argue that Owl City received a review because the band&#039;s popularity originated online. Bands that got big on FM first seem to get no love at Pitchfork, and I think that&#039;s a pretty lame standard of measurement, as not all FM-first bands are terrible. (Hip-hop seems to be the only exception to that rule, though Pitchfork does go out of its way to include acts from Rhymesayers and Def Jux, neither of whom get much FM play.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Leor: The conversation about emo came up when Scott and I were seated next to each other at the Future of Music Coalition's journalism panel. Scott basically said that Pitchfork saw a clear delineation between "good" late 90s/early 2000s emo, and the crummy shit that rode on its coattails, which (I'm guessing) he would call the Hot Topic wave of emo: My Chemical Romance, The Used, etc. </p>
<p>Oddly enough, Pitchfork reviewed Brand New's second album, but refused to review <em>Daisy</em>, even though Scott said that there was some pull for it at Pitchfork. </p>
<p>I included that anecdote because I think it illustrates a weakness in letting buzz/trendiness and indie thinking set the standards. I would argue that Owl City received a review because the band's popularity originated online. Bands that got big on FM first seem to get no love at Pitchfork, and I think that's a pretty lame standard of measurement, as not all FM-first bands are terrible. (Hip-hop seems to be the only exception to that rule, though Pitchfork does go out of its way to include acts from Rhymesayers and Def Jux, neither of whom get much FM play.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leor</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2009/11/05/pitchfork-shoots-barrelled-fish-welephant-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-35886</link>
		<dc:creator>Leor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/?p=13109#comment-35886</guid>
		<description>Interesting... How&#039;d it come up that Plagenhoef said there&#039;s an unofficial moratorium on writing about emo on P4k? &#039;Cause they&#039;ve been doing a bit of it lately (what with Sunny Day, The Get Up Kids and whatnot)... although that would explain why they got rid of some reviews of emo acts from earlier in their existence (be it the 9.7 review of How It Feels To Be Something On or just about every ribbing of JEW, TPR, The Appleseed Cast, etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting... How'd it come up that Plagenhoef said there's an unofficial moratorium on writing about emo on P4k? 'Cause they've been doing a bit of it lately (what with Sunny Day, The Get Up Kids and whatnot)... although that would explain why they got rid of some reviews of emo acts from earlier in their existence (be it the 9.7 review of How It Feels To Be Something On or just about every ribbing of JEW, TPR, The Appleseed Cast, etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

