<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Rock Criticism Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/</link>
	<description>News and Criticism on D.C. and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:39:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: casey</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3143</link>
		<dc:creator>casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3143</guid>
		<description>Good criticism will only die when good writing dies. Has that already happened? 

Who gives a shit about the consumer? Writing and analysis is an art form in itself, and that&#039;s to be respected. What we have to give up is the idea of adequate compensation for our labors. (Something many musicians have already come to terms with -- and once again, I&#039;m one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good criticism will only die when good writing dies. Has that already happened? </p>
<p>Who gives a shit about the consumer? Writing and analysis is an art form in itself, and that&#8217;s to be respected. What we have to give up is the idea of adequate compensation for our labors. (Something many musicians have already come to terms with &#8212; and once again, I&#8217;m one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>Talk about a death long-overdue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about a death long-overdue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>Well, I think what&#039;s important now is not just the lone &quot;filter,&quot; but the aggregate. Goldstein longs for the uber-critic, the person who can vastly influence culture with a handful of keystrokes.

I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s possible anymore (see: the information age), or even desirable. Was Meltzer right about seventies rock music? No. He was like Godard, burning through possibilities as such a fast clip that he didn&#039;t know where to go next. He was bored, so, therefore, the music must be boring.

For better or for worse, that era is behind us, I think. But, you know, if colleague after colleague goes to bat for a record that means a lot more to me than, say, a single Sasha Frere-Jones column.

Back in the day, people paid attention to their friends, too. I mean, I had never read a review of Led Zeppelin IV or Unforgettable Fire when I bought those records. My sister played them for me. Or someone at church. Or I heard them at camp. 

You know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think what&#8217;s important now is not just the lone &#8220;filter,&#8221; but the aggregate. Goldstein longs for the uber-critic, the person who can vastly influence culture with a handful of keystrokes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s possible anymore (see: the information age), or even desirable. Was Meltzer right about seventies rock music? No. He was like Godard, burning through possibilities as such a fast clip that he didn&#8217;t know where to go next. He was bored, so, therefore, the music must be boring.</p>
<p>For better or for worse, that era is behind us, I think. But, you know, if colleague after colleague goes to bat for a record that means a lot more to me than, say, a single Sasha Frere-Jones column.</p>
<p>Back in the day, people paid attention to their friends, too. I mean, I had never read a review of Led Zeppelin IV or Unforgettable Fire when I bought those records. My sister played them for me. Or someone at church. Or I heard them at camp. </p>
<p>You know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael J. West</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael J. West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s both, the advance CDs and the electronic information--at least in my case. At least for now.

But I wouldn&#039;t call it gatekeeping, more like a filtration system: You, sir, are the one who distinguishes the noteworthies--successes AND failures--from the staggering tide of mediocrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s both, the advance CDs and the electronic information&#8211;at least in my case. At least for now.</p>
<p>But I wouldn&#8217;t call it gatekeeping, more like a filtration system: You, sir, are the one who distinguishes the noteworthies&#8211;successes AND failures&#8211;from the staggering tide of mediocrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>I think that there&#039;s something to the efficiency argument that Michael&#039;s making (I&#039;ve called it gatekeeping before, but that upsets a lot of people). And I think that will eventually save a lot of jobs. Or it will inspire new jobs after the old jobs are gone.

But I don&#039;t even think it&#039;s an issue of listening to a lot of free CDs--which are not as plentiful as they used to be--so much as sorting through a lot of electronic information (upcoming release lists, emails from PR folks, digital downloads, etc.) and finding something that might interest you enough to inspire 50 to 1,200 words of criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there&#8217;s something to the efficiency argument that Michael&#8217;s making (I&#8217;ve called it gatekeeping before, but that upsets a lot of people). And I think that will eventually save a lot of jobs. Or it will inspire new jobs after the old jobs are gone.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t even think it&#8217;s an issue of listening to a lot of free CDs&#8211;which are not as plentiful as they used to be&#8211;so much as sorting through a lot of electronic information (upcoming release lists, emails from PR folks, digital downloads, etc.) and finding something that might interest you enough to inspire 50 to 1,200 words of criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curm</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>curm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>The vocation is not in any danger as long as you&#039;ll work for free cds and not money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vocation is not in any danger as long as you&#8217;ll work for free cds and not money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael J. West</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael J. West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>I want to say that I still read criticism for guidance on my CD acquisitions...but at this point I&#039;m getting 20 CDs a week, for free, in the mail, so who&#039;m I kidding?

But then, that&#039;s REALLY the point, isn&#039;t it? We, the critics, wade through piles of dreck and find the gems so the public doesn&#039;t have to. And I don&#039;t think that vocation is in any danger: Everybody wants to find the good stuff themselves, but ferreting out the crap is someone else&#039;s job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to say that I still read criticism for guidance on my CD acquisitions&#8230;but at this point I&#8217;m getting 20 CDs a week, for free, in the mail, so who&#8217;m I kidding?</p>
<p>But then, that&#8217;s REALLY the point, isn&#8217;t it? We, the critics, wade through piles of dreck and find the gems so the public doesn&#8217;t have to. And I don&#8217;t think that vocation is in any danger: Everybody wants to find the good stuff themselves, but ferreting out the crap is someone else&#8217;s job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I&#039;m kind of amazed, in this day and age, when print media wastes space on kickers like &quot;if-you-like-X-you&#039;ll-love-Y.&quot; 

Granted, this is now the realm of the &quot;OMG-I-just-heard-this-leak&quot; blog post (&quot;Track 7 is faster than track 6!&quot;). But even there it&#039;s just silly. What these people are really be saying is that, &#039;hey, I heard this song/record befor you did.&#039;

I read criticism because I like to read. Not because I&#039;m planning my time/budget for the week. 

Arts criticism predates everything we&#039;re talking about here--movies, records, videogames. It&#039;s probably a safe bet that it&#039;ll be here long after we&#039;re gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I&#8217;m kind of amazed, in this day and age, when print media wastes space on kickers like &#8220;if-you-like-X-you&#8217;ll-love-Y.&#8221; </p>
<p>Granted, this is now the realm of the &#8220;OMG-I-just-heard-this-leak&#8221; blog post (&#8221;Track 7 is faster than track 6!&#8221;). But even there it&#8217;s just silly. What these people are really be saying is that, &#8216;hey, I heard this song/record befor you did.&#8217;</p>
<p>I read criticism because I like to read. Not because I&#8217;m planning my time/budget for the week. </p>
<p>Arts criticism predates everything we&#8217;re talking about here&#8211;movies, records, videogames. It&#8217;s probably a safe bet that it&#8217;ll be here long after we&#8217;re gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cherkis</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3131</link>
		<dc:creator>Cherkis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3131</guid>
		<description>I think Don brings up a good point. If you can hear the music for free, why bother reading through a Pitchfork review? That&#039;s why I think Other Music&#039;s website is such a go-to for me. It offers concise descriptions and backgrounds of its releases and allows you to listen to soundclips. If I&#039;m interested, I usually hit up the band&#039;s myspace or...other blogs.

That being said, I do think there should be space for long-form reviews, arguments, and well-constructed essays. Burton&#039;s Art Ensemble of Chicago review comes to mind. Glenn Dixon&#039;s take down of Patti Smith comes to mind as well. 

I also think Love is a Mixtape is a book I couldn&#039;t recommend enough. 

http://www.randomhouse.com/crown/mixtape/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Don brings up a good point. If you can hear the music for free, why bother reading through a Pitchfork review? That&#8217;s why I think Other Music&#8217;s website is such a go-to for me. It offers concise descriptions and backgrounds of its releases and allows you to listen to soundclips. If I&#8217;m interested, I usually hit up the band&#8217;s myspace or&#8230;other blogs.</p>
<p>That being said, I do think there should be space for long-form reviews, arguments, and well-constructed essays. Burton&#8217;s Art Ensemble of Chicago review comes to mind. Glenn Dixon&#8217;s take down of Patti Smith comes to mind as well. </p>
<p>I also think Love is a Mixtape is a book I couldn&#8217;t recommend enough. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/crown/mixtape/" rel="nofollow">http://www.randomhouse.com/crown/mixtape/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curm</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/music/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>curm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/blackplasticbag/2008/04/15/is-rock-criticism-dead/#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>A particular critic (or critics) had no depth of knowledge so you decided not read any critics. Interesting jump there.  As for the netflix and downloading thing, I find that there are so many movies and albums new and old out there, that it&#039;s valuable to read the opinion of others, to help narrow down choices (esp. when you&#039;re busy with dayjob and other stuff)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A particular critic (or critics) had no depth of knowledge so you decided not read any critics. Interesting jump there.  As for the netflix and downloading thing, I find that there are so many movies and albums new and old out there, that it&#8217;s valuable to read the opinion of others, to help narrow down choices (esp. when you&#8217;re busy with dayjob and other stuff)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
