<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HarperCollins Sells Its Soul, Uses Benjamins to Dry Tears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/books/2009/11/23/harpercollins-sells-its-soul-uses-benjamins-to-dry-tears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/books/2009/11/23/harpercollins-sells-its-soul-uses-benjamins-to-dry-tears/</link>
	<description>News and Criticism on D.C. and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:17:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Riggs</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/books/2009/11/23/harpercollins-sells-its-soul-uses-benjamins-to-dry-tears/comment-page-1/#comment-37588</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/?p=14211#comment-37588</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Argumentum ad hominem&lt;/em&gt;! *Wand-waving motion*

I think Wolff&#039;s argument is stronger for that fact that he simply co-opted the more general argument against people who write celebrity memoirs, and tweaked it into a critique of the houses that publish celebrity memoirs. 

But now that I&#039;ve had 13 minutes to digest his rant, I think he&#039;s missing a great biz opportunity. HarperCollins could use its shiterature to prop up its literature! Like WaPo and Kaplan!

For the record, I have nothing against celebrity memoirs. I&#039;ve been reading Paul Mooney&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Black Is the New White&lt;/em&gt;, and it&#039;s really good. Like &lt;em&gt;Dreams From My Father&lt;/em&gt; if it were cut up and then mad-libbed by Richard Pryor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Argumentum ad hominem</em>! *Wand-waving motion*</p>
<p>I think Wolff's argument is stronger for that fact that he simply co-opted the more general argument against people who write celebrity memoirs, and tweaked it into a critique of the houses that publish celebrity memoirs. </p>
<p>But now that I've had 13 minutes to digest his rant, I think he's missing a great biz opportunity. HarperCollins could use its shiterature to prop up its literature! Like WaPo and Kaplan!</p>
<p>For the record, I have nothing against celebrity memoirs. I've been reading Paul Mooney's <em>Black Is the New White</em>, and it's really good. Like <em>Dreams From My Father</em> if it were cut up and then mad-libbed by Richard Pryor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Cavanaugh</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/books/2009/11/23/harpercollins-sells-its-soul-uses-benjamins-to-dry-tears/comment-page-1/#comment-37585</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Cavanaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/?p=14211#comment-37585</guid>
		<description>Michael Wolff is the uncreator of value. Is he really the fella to be judging a dying industry for trying to sell products people want to buy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Wolff is the uncreator of value. Is he really the fella to be judging a dying industry for trying to sell products people want to buy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

