Modern Love Architect David Jameson knows D.C.'s buildings don't have to be ugly. Now he's trying to convince the rest of the world, too.

There is a house off 11th Street NW that rises higher than all its neighbors. Even if you’ve never passed under its shadow, you know this house by reputation: the notoriously impolite three-story pop-up that interrupts the familiar rhythm of rowhouses on V Street NW. When its construction began in March of last year, DCist dubbed it “a middle finger to taste and scale.” Ward 1 Councilmember Jim Graham condemned it as a “monstrosity” this winter.

For months, Graham has been waving the bloody flag, warning residents that more such monstrosities were coming—even with regard to new projects that have nothing to do with pop-ups whatsoever. “If you look on Ontario Place, it’s like a warehouse that’s been built on top of a rowhouse,” he told Washington City Paper in November. In December, he wrote to a U Street–area email list about the dread menace of pop-ups, once again citing a building that isn’t anything like the one on V Street. “On Ontario Place in Adams Morgan, there is an expansion so large that it looks like another Wal-Mart!”

There are two big differences between the Slot House—that’s the home under construction, and nearing completion, on Ontario Place NW in Adams Morgan—and the Middle Finger House (known more officially as The Ella) just off the U Street corridor. The first is categorical: The Slot House is not a pop-up, like the Middle Finger add-on, but a fill-in. There was nothing but grass growing in the 14-foot gap separating the Slot House’s neighbors before its construction began. The other difference is David Jameson.

“You don’t notice this from the street,” says Jameson, 46, the architect who designed the Slot House. “Unlike that other piece that says, ‘I’m going to go six stories in the air and tell you to go fuck yourself.’”

All the other rowhouses on Ontario Place extend out to the street (as most rowhouses tend to do). This one is deeply set back. The house is framed by two pewter blade walls that run the entire length of the home. The walls serve several functions; one is to convey light deep into the space. “It took us a year to get [D.C. Zoning Administrator] Matt LeGrant to permit this,” Jameson says. “But there’s nothing in the zoning that says you have to build a rowhouse right up to the street.”

Graham’s threatening to make that one-year approval process that much harder, just because the Slot House design is large. That may be the only thing it has in common with the Ella.

Looking from the street, it’s almost hard to see the Slot House’s stucco tower, the volume that rises about as high as the Ella pop-up and provides a roof-deck view of Rock Creek Park and the National Cathedral. There’s an apartment building behind Ontario Place, and the Slot House tower rises just above it, meaning the elevation isn’t alone in space. Meanwhile, the glass-paneled basement-level studio—a feature tucked out of sight under most rowhouses—is prominent from the street (and inviting, too). Visible through four mesh metal panels (which will be covered in ivy) is the central massing of the house, which is done in Pennsylvania hemlock treated by fire in the Japanese shou-sugi-ban method.

“These guys actually lit my fucking house on fire in Bethesda scorching this wood,” Jameson says. “There’s no staging area for this kind of work.”

So Graham may just eat his words over the Slot House—one of the most compelling residential designs in the District. Far from an abomination, it’s typical of the work that has won David Jameson Architects more than 175 design awards since 2001. It’s the kind of project that proves that contemporary design can live alongside traditional homes in D.C. and that new rowhouses don’t have to be vulgar.

Another project may go even further. Jameson’s plan for the multifamily-unit building that anchors the development for the McMillan Slow Sand Filtration Plant site may prove that condo mid-rise buildings—the 21st-century answer to the rowhouse—needn’t look like they were assembled by factories and dropped by drones all over the District.

advertisement

The factors that make cookie-cutter condos ubiquitous in D.C. also make high design a real possibility (barring screwball politics). People here earn relatively high incomes, enjoy sophisticated cultural pursuits, and tolerate urban density. The exploding population growth that spurred cheap multifamily architecture across the city is finally starting to slow down a little bit—perhaps enough that quality will turn up as a consideration. It’s not just Jameson’s goal to improve the architectural quality of the built environment in the District. It’s his goal to make D.C. architecture an export.

In fact, he’s already there: “There is really no other studio in D.C. that goes out of the city to take the work that is thought about here to other environments.”

Jameson has none of the clichéd affectations of an architect. He grew up in Delmar, Md., and his Eastern Shore upbringing shows in his hard-charging character. It’s useful in his line of work, he says, because he knows how to code-switch between talking to overeducated architects and contractors he went to high school with. (“If the guys doing your floors don’t believe in your work, whew, you’re done.”) He eats at Guapo’s in Tenleytown about once a week, he says, because it’s a block from his firm’s studio and it’s a place his two kids (ages 8 and 11) can go nuts.

The most important project of Jameson’s career was his first, and it came in 1998. “I was doing this little one-car garage,” he says. “Guy was working for a company that was bought up by AOL. He bought a Volvo. He wanted a place to protect it. ‘I want a place to park my car, and I’m willing to spend $25,000 on it—that’s it,’” Jameson recalls. The architect pitched his Capitol Hill client on a private concert hall to listen to the weekly performances from the Marine Barracks a block away. “How about we focus on the in-between space between the house and the car?”

A curving, lead-coated copper wall, framed by cantilevered steel and brick, leads into the roughly 300-square-foot Meeker Garage. The project—which Jameson completed when he was 30—won eight different design awards in 1998. Other D.C.-area buildings that won in similar categories that year include the Verizon Center (then the MCI Center) and the U.S. Census Bureau’s Bowie Computer Center, both megaprojects. Perhaps even more impressively, Jameson’s renovation scheme circumnavigated the need for a D.C. zoning hearing for lot coverage while also meeting Capitol Hill Preservation Board requirements.

Architect David Haresign, who met Jameson back when he first completed the Meeker Garage (“a terrific little project”), says that Jameson now ranks as one of the three best contemporary residential architects working in D.C. (The other two, he says, are Bob Gurney and Mark McInturff—architects whose names come up in conversation with Jameson.) Haresign, who just finished a term as the president of the D.C. chapter of the American Institute of Architects, compares Jameson’s work to good bourbon. “He’s a distiller. He captures the key ideas,” Haresign says. “He’s so skilled at it that he’s sought out.”

Fifteen years ago, though, no one expected small-batch, craft-quality work from Jameson, except maybe Jameson himself. After graduating from the five-year architecture program at Virginia Tech, where he attended school on a baseball scholarship, Jameson wormed his way into D.C.’s noblest architectural tradition. He had already been rejected twice by Hugh Newell Jacobsen’s firm when he slipped the architect his portfolio while getting a book signed—and told him he’d work for free. Jameson got the (paying) job.

Jameson “is a risk-taker,” Haresign says. “He’s a larger-than-life kind of guy. He’s a good thinker, and a talker.”

Jacobsen was a D.C. legend who had designed scores of homes, especially around Georgetown, when Jameson started working for him. He had presided over the renovations of the Smithsonian Institution’s Arts and Industries Museum and Renwick Gallery, as well as the Capitol’s West Terrace.

“Hugh [Jacobsen] was the successor to Charles Goodman,” says Gregg Bleam, a Charlottesville, Va.–based landscape architect who has worked with David Jameson Architects since 2001. Goodman set the bar for postwar D.C., designing the original National Airport as well as the aluminum-clad River Park Mutual Homes complex in Southwest. Bleam (himself a protégé of the great landscape architect Dan Kiley) says Jameson wanted to be the next singular voice in D.C. architecture.

Jameson’s apprenticeship ended in 1996, at a time when Washington-area houses were growing wildly in size but not especially in stylistic scope. “I started the practice with building what I would call closet modernist projects, these jewel-box additions to colonial houses—these things where the face of the project still had a mannerism geared toward yesteryear,” Jameson says. Following his unlikely breakthrough, he launched David Jameson Architect Inc. in Alexandria in 2001.

“I grew up in a family of architects, I’m not an easy test to pass, and he is one of the best,” says art dealer George Hemphill, who hired Jameson to design his 14th Street NW gallery in 2004. “Galleries are tools for the presentation of and selling of art,” Hemphill says. “Over my 40 years of working in galleries, this is the best tool I have had the pleasure of using.”

The two have frequently traded clients. Hemphill artists like Steve Kushner and Robin Rose have done five-figure commissions for Jameson’s homes. Hemphill once sent a collector looking for a kitchen renovation Jameson’s way; the architect wound up designing a new, 3,500-square-foot home for her: the Dahlonega Residence in Bethesda, which won several regional design awards last year.

Jameson has a collection of accolades like these. He was the youngest architect to appear in Architectural Digest’s roster of the world’s 100 best architects and designers in 2010. The London-based magazine Wallpaper named David Jameson Architects as one of four emerging U.S. talents to watch in 2011. And the Wall Street Journal has described him as one of the two best residential architects on the East Coast and one of 10 best house designers nationwide.

Success hasn’t gone to his head, either. “He is more mature, whatever that means,” Haresign says. He says that Jameson is a bolder architect now, in terms of how he uses design and technology. (And even color. “His palettes are richer and his spaces are getting warmer and more humane.”) Hemphill, too, says that Jameson lacks the stereotypical “round-spectacled pretense” and praises his “relaxed and natural manner.”

Easygoing is more like it. But while he may be a casual guy, he is a devout technocrat. Piles of new materials are stacked up against every wall in his firm’s studio. His own home in Bethesda is something of a workshop. “I like the process of exploring new ideas in my house,” Jameson says. “I had an idea about coplanar windows and sliding doors, so we invented them with a custom window company. I had an idea about the façade system, and we invented something never seen before.”

Success hasn’t exploded his firm. “This is the smallest firm I’ve ever worked at,” says Alex Wojno, a designer who joined the firm two years ago, just before it moved from Alexandria to the fourth floor of a fairly nondescript building near the Tenleytown Metro station. The firm employs 10 people, some of whom work part-time on specialized tasks like lighting or 3D modeling.

“Everyone here is in charge of their own projects, from concept to construction,” Wojno says. In some ways, the firm is still country. Wojno’s thesis drawings hang on the wall, adding to a generalized clutter; while she was still finishing her graduate degree, her colleagues served as her unofficial advisors. But it’s metropolitan, too: Jameson’s architects hail from some of the best ateliers on the planet, including OMA (the firm founded by Rem Koolhaas) and Peter Zumthor (the architect tapped to reset the campus for the Los Angeles County Museum of Art).

Yet it’s also classic: Jameson wants to bring on an in-house structural engineer, he says, because he is a student of Louis Khan’s studio and Frank Lloyd Wright’s studio, and that’s the way they did it. “You work with every kind of consultant you could ever work with,” Wojno says.

When I visit over lunch one day, the staff has picked up Crisp & Juicy on Jameson’s dime. It’s a studio quid-pro-quo: He buys them lunch, they sit through a seminar on Revit (a building information modeling software).

“I’m sitting here in a sweatshirt with a hood on it and sneakers on,” Jameson says. “It’s not really different from a studio at MIT. Architecture can be art—yes, it has to meet budget, yes, it has to meet program, yes, it has to meet historic preservation review—but it can still be art.”

One thing that David Jameson Architects is not: a house of style. Neither his clients nor his colleagues align him with any particular movement or ideology (beyond modernist). Jameson waves off the question. “We’re bringing a set of principles to play instead of a style,” he says. “I’d love to believe the style isn’t any evident in any manner. We’re Janus-faced! Like the Roman god. Looking forward but also looking to the past.”

“Who do you think when you think classic D.C. rowhouse? Harry Wardman,” Jameson says, as we pull plastic booties over our shoes to tour the interior of the Slot House. “Harry Wardman always used heart pine floors. That was the bespoke wood of the day.”

Long, uninterrupted beams of heart pine fitted perfectly to the space compose the floors of the Ontario Place house. Inside, at a perpendicular to the ground plane, Jameson has designed a vertical void—one where he’s built “a column of light, but also a column of darkness.” While light streams down from a skylight above, a multiton blackened steel stair with trapezoidal winding rails and perforated steel mesh steps rises up from below. This column of darkness is also a column of brightness: The perforated metal steps feel lightweight, and it’s possible to see through them to floors above and below.

“Other architects depend on painterly devices to get there, where David works from the purity of the diagram,” Bleam says. “Volumetrically, what he does is what makes the work.”

One way to describe Jameson’s work is in the way he arranges volumes. For the NaCL House in Bethesda, the firm arranged various rooms and cubic masses to resemble an outcropping of rock salt. Many of the forms appear to hover just off the ground. The Graticule House in Great Falls, Va., features an upper wall that serves to cover an outdoor terrace—though it appears as if it’s a slice of a room that has been left suspended while the rest was removed.

Jameson’s best-known built project within the District is the Barcode House, a townhouse addition near Dupont Circle on 18th Street NW between Riggs and S streets. The design appears to remove one wall of the home entirely, replacing it with glass panels rising two stories and intersected by steel bars that form a vertical barcode.

“He doesn’t compromise his vision, but he’s able to adjust it in a way that you are pleased,” says William Agosto, who owns the Barcode House with his husband. The project called for a third of the house (a previous addition) to be removed and rebuilt. Jameson confined the project to the existing perimeter of the legally permitted addition, making it a “replacement in kind”—meaning the project didn’t require a public hearing for another permit because it wasn’t adding any volume.

The Barcode House bypassed Dupont Circle’s notorious NIMBYs because Jameson routed around them. (Jameson’s colleagues in architecture say they admire his use of new technologies; his clients praise him for cutting the red tape.) But Agosto—who says he waves back when people wave to him through the transparent glass walls of his home—thinks it was never likely to be a problem.

“Without mimicking the past, he’s able to create something that fits well within the neighborhood or in the house. Continuing certain lines, following certain patterns,” Agosto says.

None of Jameson’s homes refers architecturally to the others—or to the BlackWhite Residence, or the Tea House, or the Jigsaw Residence, or the Matryoshka Residence (or to the growing roster of the firm’s projects outside the area, flung as far and wide as Southern California and Hanoi). And none of these homes is bound to resemble the McMillan project, whatever name that eventually takes.

“The developer wanted someone who would push the envelope,” says Anne Corbett, project director for Envision McMillan. For the multifamily project, Jameson is collaborating with MV&A, the firm that designed the mixed-use building anchored by a Walmart at 1st and H streets NW. “There wasn’t an architectural firm with the technical expertise who would push the envelope from a design standpoint. Obviously, this kind of building is not in David’s normal wheelhouse. Pushing the design envelope certainly is.”

While he has yet to release detailed designs, Jameson says that he is collaborating on the façade system with Bill Zahner, the Kansas City, Mo.–based machinist who has worked with Frank Gehry to execute most of that architect’s titanium tapestries. (That doesn’t mean he plans to drape twisted metal over the apartment building—he’d have more groups than Save McMillan Park after him if he did.) Jameson will say that the metalwork for the façade, which appear in renderings to be a series of fins, will be a specific callout to the site’s history as a sand-filtration site.

“He kind of took apart the DNA of the site,” Corbett says. “I think his process was good for the team as a whole, pushing the other architects to think a little bit differently about how they responded to the site.” Jameson’s involvement on the McMillan project may not be limited to one building, she notes; phase two calls for another mixed-use building, and while the work hasn’t been contracted yet, she says there’s no reason to think Jameson won’t be involved.

“We got the McMillan project because the process of the work is scalable. For many residential architects, it’s difficult to move from small to big or from inexpensive to expensive,” Jameson says. “But none of those things matter to scaling my work.”

There’s still a staggering number of hurdles for Envision McMillan to overcome before the design becomes a reality. The project cleared one by winning the approval of the Historic Preservation Review Board in October. Envision McMillan will come before the Zoning Commission in several public hearings in late April or early May. Then, with those recommendations appended, the plan goes before the Mayor’s Agent, who is involved because the project requires demolition to adapt the landmark.

One of the biggest battles has already been won: persuading a developer to invest in the design aspect of a mixed-use building plan.

“It’s almost like the World’s Fair in Chicago,” Jameson says. “It will be a slightly different thing than anything else in Chicago.”

Jameson spent the Super Bowl in Fayetteville, Ark., where he traveled to give a talk for a lecture series at the University of Arkansas school of architecture. Other speakers in the school’s 2013–14 lineup include Tod Williams and Billie Tsien, the architects who designed the new Barnes Foundation in Philadelphia, and Peter Eisenman, the architect and theorist who designed Berlin’s Holocaust Memorial.

“I was begging Marlon Blackwell to get me out of there before the ice storm did me in,” Jameson says. (Blackwell is Arkansas’ best-known architect.) “We’re watching the Broncos get pounced, and Marlon says, ‘We’re just in this totally challenged ZIP code.’ I’m like, what are you talking about? You’re doing the architecture school, the local high school, you’ve got all the major players. I feel like I’m ZIP code challenged,” Jameson says.

That hasn’t always been the case. “When the real-estate boom hit, the value of land eclipsed the value of building. That was huge for me. I was able to go quite quickly from small additions to large additions that looked like new houses—to new houses,” he says. “And those houses became the paradigm of habitable art.”

Today it’s that wealth that sets D.C. apart. Census data for 2010 put median household income for the D.C. region at $84,523, making it the highest-income region in the nation. Fayetteville, where Blackwell toils alone, pulls in an estimated median household income of $34,393.

The downside to D.C. ZIP codes is that clients think more and more that the only ones that matter are elsewhere—and mostly in New York. All three firms shortlisted by Catholic University to design an addition for the Edward M. Crough Center for Architectural Studies, for example, are boutique firms from northeast of here (Architecture Research Office, Lewis.Tsurumaki.Lewis, and Gray Organschi Architecture). D.C. architects aren’t likely to make the cut when a cultural organization needs a name it can fundraise against.

“Look at the Richard Meier high-rise in New York,” Jameson says. “The closest thing that’s being built today [in D.C.] is the Foster + Partners project at CityCenter. And even that’s safe.”

Another challenge for architects with D.C. ZIP codes is that there are too many of them.

“There’s a shitload of architects in D.C. There’s more architecture firms here than in L.A. or Chicago. Think about Chicago: How many firms are really kicking ass in Chicago? There’s one or two or three,” Jameson says. He pauses. “Why is it my studio is thought of as this singular voice for architecture in the city? That’s the question we try to answer in the studio. I want to believe the answer is: We’re just doing really compelling work.”

D.C. architects face local competition from some of the largest firms in the world, which all keep offices in Washington for the sheer amount of work the federal government produces. It’s scratch for a major design corporation, like AECOM or HOK or Gensler or Perkins+Will—all of which have D.C. offices—to do work in town on a pro-bono basis that a smaller firm might want for its portfolio (and to make a living).

“There’s a layering of firms that only do development, only do government, only do transportation work,” Jameson says. “Having a firm that is a generalist and wanting to do everything, it’s challenging in that respect.”

“As a contemporary architect, [Jameson]’s had the good fortune to be on the bleeding edge of contemporary architecture,” Haresign says. He takes the long view that architecture in D.C. has been steadily improving since the 1970s, beginning with I.M. Pei’s design for the East Wing of the National Gallery of Art. Bland multifamily buildings don’t contradict that overall trend, in his opinion. “The quality of architecture in D.C. has been on an upward trajectory. David’s a strong leader in that regard.”

Nevertheless, Jameson’s involvement with Envision McMillan is an encouraging prospect—especially given that the surge in economic growth in D.C. has been met by such dreary design. Tedious condo buildings have choked 14th Street NW and other corridors in the last five years. Perhaps one new building with some design acumen will encourage developers to reconsider aesthetics as a strategy for creating investment opportunities.

There are signs that this is happening elsewhere. David Adjaye, the London star designing the National Museum of African American History and Culture on the National Mall, is converting the West Heating Plant into high-end condos for Georgetown, where the famed Mexican firm Ten Arquitectos is designing the West End Library. What Envision McMillan will test is whether compelling design from D.C. can be brought to bear on projects nowhere near 20037.

And if the answer’s yes, then it means D.C. might soon enjoy more of the approach to mass and space and volume that is winning Jameson renown outside the District.

“I’d love to see a greater emphasis on actual place-making and design itself in D.C.,” Jameson says. “I came to D.C. in 1991. I’ve been here for 25 years this year. This is a place where architecture has always been imported to. I’d love to see that change.”

Correction: Due to a reporting error, this story originally misspelled the name of the Dahlonega Residence.

Our Readers Say

Thank you City Paper for printing this excellent article on a great local architect. It is amazing to realize how little time and efforts is being
spent by the media on the subject of the quality of the environment we produce
and live in. Mr. Jameson deserves our gratitude for standing by his beliefs that everything we design must be judged by how it helps to enliven, enrich, and educate our eyes and contributes to our improvement in environmental appreciation. I also think that his designs kick ass. I hope that he lives long and prospers.
This guy's work is a joke, and the City Paper does a disservice to Washington by promoting it as good simply because it apes what is being done in NY and London. He knows not one thing about urban design. This stuff is, in the aggregate, destructive to cities.
That tacky old queen Jim Graham is about the last person to be considered on matters related to aesthetics and taste. Only as to integrity does he rank lower (lower than pond scum on that).
@Ann Gree - Architecture isn't my area of expertise so I'm ignorant to who the local players are. Can you let us know what architect(s) in the DC area are better than him?
Let the record state that Jameson's know nothing acolytes have already taken to personal attacks on people's sexuality to, ostensibly, undercut their opinions. Incredible tactic, easy to parry such childishness, but it is not surprising. When the emperor is not wearing any clothes, assault those who dare point out the truth.

Jameson's work is destructive...imagine living in a world without grace and beauty, and that is Jameson's Corbusian desire. He does pretentious garbage for cash. He ignores urban design principles, and he designs pretentious trash for the moneyed elite.
Sonya - since all his work is houses for the super rich, I'll first give you a list of architects with the same clientele, but who do a much better job: Muse Architects, David Jones, Alan Greenberg for traditional buildings. Prefer modern? Cunningham Quill, and Mark McInturf come to mind.
@Ann - A few of these names look familiar but I'll check them out further. Thanks!
I would only say that form should follow function no matter what. A design may look great but if it is not functional, why bother? I know of more than one modernist house in Bethesda which is gorgeous to look at. But the extensive use of glass gives its inhabitants no privacy.

I want every structure to be fully functional and esthetically pleasing.
"People here earn relatively high incomes, enjoy sophisticated cultural pursuits, and tolerate urban density."

Given DC opposition to raising the height limit and the NIMBYism so many projects encounter I am not so sure about the last part of this statement.
@Ann: neither of the "modern" architects you mentioned appear to build terribly modern homes. Both feature homes on their websites that are mostly traditional with perhaps contemporary aspects, whereas David Jameson appears to build truly cutting edge, graceful, modern buildings. Sorry you don't like modern architecture, but this is really a matter of taste and not objective (as you seem to think it is).
I don't know if anyone has ever called McInturff or Cunningham Quill modern in the last ten years. McInturff is a good post-pomo designer, though.

How did poor old Corbu get roped into this? You know Allan Greenberg loves Corbu, right?
@gimbels lover: For the purposes of this article I lumped in McInturff under "contemporary," even though that's more a term of art than architecture. I agree, he's post-pomo (and good).

@Colin: Fair enough. I think the trend is that I aspiring home-owners support growth and density until they buy a home—then they're incumbents protecting their investment.
No worries, Kriston - I was responding to Ann Gree's comments. You're good, cowboy. Thanks for the article.
@Matt - You're wrong sweetie. There are very specific things about modern architecture that tend to be anti modern. This is why there are so few truly great modernist urban places - they tend to place emphasis on the building as a multi sided thing and not on the space of the street. It's not about modern architecture either - there are plenty of nice modern buildings. This stuff doesn't qualify primarily because he misunderstands, or worse, deliberately ignores, the urban function of architecture, particularly with that McMillan building of his. check out the first pass at that beauty! The McMillan Advisory Group can help you with that one. What a joke!

@Goebbels-Lover - I was talking about Corbusian urbanism. Check out Ville Radieuse. Greenberg might love his architecture, but I doubt he loves his urbanism, and so what if he does? His architecture is still a whole lot better than Jamesons's.
Seriously, after reading this, it makes me sad for the state of American journalism. This "author" goes out of her way to forward an agenda, without any thought that maybe that which she wants pushed might have another, more sinister, side. City Paper, you've lost a reader forever. Reading this article, I felt like I was watching Fox News, so in thrall is the author to this guy. I looked up his work - it's terribly depressing.

As for the modern architecture argument that has ensued, I'll say this - if you want to see the sum total of what building like Jameson gives you, go to Paris. The city is a wonder, with timeless architecture that is beautiful, and then go to La Defense, where his philosophy can be seen in its full glory. It is a horror. I'm not an architect, but what Ann is saying makes sense, though I can't say I understand why. Modern buildings never seem to feel very good, in DC (which is "ugly" as Jameson likes to say which he implies his work is not) or Paris or London or Beijing. It is a curse, isn't it, modern architecture? Why do architects do this to the rest of us? Why does the City Paper feel their role is to be a shill for this sort of stuff? How is this guy news? The press is supposed to guard against tyranny and the misdeeds of the connected on behalf of the society. In short, you guys should be making the city better, not promoting making it worse. Or is it that you simply like being a contrarian? And what would the point of that be?
This isn't modern?

http://mcinturffarchitects.com/new/bridge/3.html

Nor this?

http://cunninghamquill.com/2012/quarry-house/

They both even use the au currant "Bridge House" / "Quarry House" / "Bar Code House" parlance!

It undercuts your argument when you lie. It really does, especially when it is so easy to disprove.
I'll grant you that the McInturff project has a modern handling of space (the floor plan is a bit like Patkau's Linear House). I don't care for the Cunningham Quill example.

But can you honestly say that either of those are less severe or more urban than Jameson? Don't lie.
@Ann - Great examples of homes by very good architects. I love both examples. DC needs to break out of the restrictive box the ANCs force us to design in.
There are plenty of opportunities where a wonderful mix of the classic DC rowhouse can blend in with a more modern juxtaposition of style - especially in the alley or inner courtyards where it is not so intrusive to ones style - but fails because art critics sit on ANC boards and don't want anything to change. That and developers who only want to flip a home and only added value is a quick return.
Most of the comments posted here are utterly ridiculous and are more opinions then anything else. Opinions are like A-holes and simple opinions are a by product of the observer and the observers frame of reference. Just like shit is the by product of your ass or opinion as the case may be.
Jameson’s architecture will have to be pretty amazing if it is going to help the sad over packed ordinary McMillan development plan, currently designed to maximize developers' profit at the expense of good taste, community, families, the last green space, history, heritage and the larger-longer term profit that could come with developing this site around the historic landmark (rather than in spite of it). Let's hope this guy CAN influence the other architects. But it's VMP & DC Politicians that need to be influenced, because they support drowning this spectacular historic landmark with a typical development that you can find anywhere (the only difference is that VMP keeps a handful of historic pieces as accessories - like lipstick on a pig. Let's pray that Mr. Jameson is a savior who convinces VMP/Council to save more of the 20 acres of amazing vaulted underground, which is unlike anything we've ever seen in the U.S. and, if sufficiently used & preserved, would make this development truly unique in the world, making Ward 5 a stand out destination!!! But, alas, we are stuck with unimaginative greedy people controlling the destruction of our McMillan Park National Landmark and last Ward 5 green space.
http://mcmillanpark.com/gallery.html

Check out this place!
@taxpayer...well let's just hope that no one listen you to! We've been 30 years in this process so if we can't get it done now with all the input and frankly little minds like yourself, then give it back to the FEDS. Then we'll get something no one wnats at all and there won't be shit anyone can say then!
You tell 'em, DCCommish! Which commission do you lead?

Leave a Comment

Note: HTML tags are not allowed in comments.
Comments Shown. Turn Comments Off.
...