Citizen Sindram Hyperactive Public-Hearing Witness Michael Sindram is Washington's Squeakiest Wheel

Full Article
Photograph by Darrow Montgomery

Michael Sindram, 54, regularly introduces himself at D.C. Council hearings, Advisory Neighborhood Commission meetings, and other public forums around Washington as a “disabled veteran who has served his country more than most.”

But, really, that may understate his résumé. Sindram, for instance, was among the first of 389 people to be barred from filing paupers’ petitions at the U.S. Supreme Court. He says he has also been barred from the campus of the University of the District of Columbia and, he says, from the since-closed grounds of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. For three years, he was persona non grata at the main sales office of the Washington Metro system. And, he says, there was a period when he rated an escort from D.C. Protective Services whenever he entered the Wilson Building, which he does frequently.

That’s how most Washingtonians may know Sindram. The 6-foot, 5-inch, 200-pound man with a bald head is D.C.’s most prolific public witness. When the D.C. Council mulled seemingly mundane regulatory matters, he was there. When ANC 4D, in Petworth, discussed D.C. statehood, he was there, even though he’s not a resident of that district. When ANC 3F in Cleveland Park considered a nominee for the city’s Human Rights Commission, he was there, even though he’s not a resident of that entire ward. He’s cagey about quantifying his appearances at public meetings, but a glance at the Council’s recent witness lists gives a sense of just how much Sindram the city’s elected officials are experiencing: In April, the Council held hearings on 14 days; Sindram was scheduled to testify 21 times.

In Sindram’s telling, his appearances are the basic stuff of democracy. “My mantra is the A.R.T. of good governance,” he says, wagging a finger to punctuate each letter of his homemade acronym. “Accountability, rule of law, and transparency.” His actual testimony is often somewhat more granular: He recently spoke out in favor of Elizabeth Noel’s appointment to the D.C. Public Service Commission (her candidacy was ultimately rejected) and in favor of stronger city-hall ethics laws (he thinks the recently passed legislation has major gaps). Away from the witness stand, he has a habit of asking councilmembers and government employees who wander into his path whether their actions produce “justice, or just ice.”

Ice melts in the heat, he explains.

Nearly every local political scene has someone like Sindram. His story involves long digressions into unfair speeding tickets, city agency overcharges, inaccurate tax assessments, and Americans with Disabilities Act violations. Sindram has been tenacious in fighting to get what he believes is his. His entanglement with the Supreme Court, for instance, began with a $100 speeding ticket in Dorchester County, Md. Claiming the officer lacked evidence, Sindram challenged the ticket in five different state and federal courts on 27 occasions, to no avail. So he aimed higher. From 1989 to 1991, he filed 42 petitions with the Supreme Court, all of them in forma pauperis. The justices never did take up the case of the speeding ticket, but did rule, in a 6-3 decision, that Sindram would have to pay the court’s filing fees. “[T]he Court’s order in this case appears to be nothing more than an alternative for punishing Sindram for the frequency with which he has filed petitions,” wrote Thurgood Marshall in a dissent.


But lower courts have placed similar restrictions on Sindram in years since. In April, the D.C. attorney general’s office asked the U.S. Court of Appeals to revoke Sindram’s in forma pauperis status: Last year alone, he filed 23 petitions in cases against the D.C. government, according to the attorney general’s filing. Sindram’s petitions “have diverted scarce resources,” the attorney general’s office says. Sindram disagrees—and has filed a petition against the attorney general’s request.

The system may not be granting Sindram victories. But the one thing it does offer him is a microphone. He says he first spoke at a council hearing in 2005, but can’t recall exactly what the issue was. “It probably had something to do with the Office of Human Rights,” he says. His relations with the pols who preside over hearings have been mixed. At-large Councilmember Phil Mendelson says Sindram has made a few good points during his council testimonies, though he can’t recall exactly what those points are. “Some councilmembers are afraid of him,” he says. “I think he is harmless.”

Ward 7’s Yvette Alexander has a sterner take: She recently banned Sindram from her committee office. She says two members of her staff felt threatened and uneasy by his frequent visits. “I have no problem with Mr. Sindram personally. He is very knowledgeable on the issues he cares about, but I’m going to protect my staff,” she says. Sindram says it’s payback for his having used his recent testimony to accuse Alexander of carrying Pepco’s water. She says she will revisit the ban in six months.

And it’s a good bet Sindram will be back as soon as he’s permitted. “There is no law against rocking the boat or pushing buttons,” he says. “I’m going to rock boats and push buttons. That’s my right.”

It’s 10:10 a.m. on a rainy April Wednesday as Sindram completes the first of four statements he will deliver that day before city officials. Wearing a blue-and-gray-striped rugby shirt and jeans, he goes through his boilerplate introduction—“My name is Michael Sindram, a disabled veteran who has served his country more than most”—then launches into complaints about rising Metro fares, holding up articles from the Washington Examiner to emphasize his points. Like many of her colleagues, Ward 4 Councilmember Muriel Bowser, who’s chairing the morning’s budget oversight hearing, lets Sindram testify first, presumably reasoning that once he’s finished, she can get down to business. Bowser sits stone-faced as her constituent speaks out.

Between his committee appearances, Sindram makes the rounds of the Wilson Building. He asks several councilmembers’ receptionists if he can use the office photocopier to make duplicates of his latest complaints; only Vincent Orange’s office grants him the favor. Other bureaucrats welcome him and trade gossip. He greets most people by first name—including the D.C. Protective Services officers who, he says, used to watch him, and someone named Juan from the mailroom. “He’s a great guy,” Juan says.

Sindram huddles with Aquarius Vann-Ghasri, who serves on the D.C. Housing Authority’s board of commissioners. He gets the latest news on the Potomac Gardens public housing complex, where Vann-Ghasri lives and Sindram once worked with children as a church volunteer. “Michael Sindram is a passionate voice for the people. I think too many people judge him by his appearance, not by his message,” she says.

Sindram shakes hands with Kevin Wrege, a D.C. lobbyist, who we meet in the hall. I ask Wrege if Sindram is an effective advocate. “Everyone knows him,” Wrege says. “But I don’t know what he is advocating for.”

From the Wilson Building, Sindram and I head to One Judiciary Square so he can testify before a D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics meeting. He usually rides a gray, worn-out 10-speed bike and carries a red backpack filled with documents and newspaper clippings. Since I’m on foot, we walk together down drizzly Pennsylvania Avenue. Today, he’s incensed about Mendelson, who voted against Noel’s appointment to the public service board. Sindram thinks Mendelson should have recused himself because he owns stock in Pepco, according to his latest financial disclosure statement. The utility company opposes Noel’s appointment. “Mendelson has alienated an ally,” he says repeatedly.

Sindram breezes through the metal detectors at One Judiciary Square as he banters with a female security guard. My belt buckle, however, sets off the alarm. “You are slowing my roll,” Sindram says, miffed that he may miss an opportunity to testify before the elections board, where he attends nearly every meeting. We arrive as activist Dorothy Brizill wraps up her statements. Sindram tells the board about his concerns that recent ethics legislation passed by the council creates a gap in public disclosure. “My spirit is vexed,” he says, using a Sindram catch-phrase.

After the meeting, Sindram mingles with board members. As is his habit, he hands over supplemental materials—some of them related to his testimony, others not. Over the course of our talks, he has presented me with several issues of VFW magazine, the VVA Veteran, a photo book commemorating the 25th anniversary of the Vietnam War Memorial, the spring edition of the Our Daily Bread prayer book, and copies of the free conservative weekly Human Events (“It’s a great newspaper,” he says). He’s also shared enough highlighted clippings from the Washington Examiner and Washington Informer to fill a scrapbook. Once, I mentioned to him that I wanted to get into shape. At our next meeting, he gave me a herbal medicine guide and a naturopathic heart health handbook.

Before we break for lunch, Sindram asks if we can stop by the Metro sales office. He says Metro barred him from the sales office from 2007 to 2010 after he complained that his backpack had been stolen when he left it by the counter window. Today’s visit leads to a small victory: Sindram gets a refund for a demagnetized Metro farecard he pulls from a five-inch stack of cards in his current backpack. He says he collected the farecards during his three-year exile from the sales office, but Metro only allows him to cash in one card per day. We agree to regroup at the Wilson Building for more council testimony in the afternoon. He leaves to meet with the D.C. tax assessor’s office to discuss the status of his bankruptcy, which he filed for in 2008.

But before the next hearing, there’s a snag. A long queue of witnesses is supposed to testify at Councilmember Michael Brown’s hearing on affordable housing. Sindram doesn’t like to wait, so he leaves, heading back down the hall to testify before a different Bowser-led committee. When that’s done, he suggests we swing by the Office of Neighborhood Engagement, where he wants to check in with some contacts. It’s getting late and Sindram is limping up the stairs. We pass an empty conference room with the light on. Sindram turns it off. “Another example of government waste,” he shrugs. Then we wait in the lobby of Orange’s office to attempt an unscheduled meeting with an aide that never happens.

Sindram wants to end our day at a Log Cabin Republicans meeting where D.C. Police Chief Cathy Lanier is scheduled to speak. But on the way out of the Wilson Building, we run into Lanier. “We love Mike,” Lanier tells me as Sindram asks for updates on crime in his neighborhood. Since we’ve seen the chief, enthusiasm for trekking to the meeting starts to ebb.

I invite Sindram to a book reading—Drop Dead Healthy by humorist A.J. Jacobs—at Sixth & I Historic Synagogue. I have an extra ticket. I’m also curious to observe how Sindram behaves at a non-political event. I suggest we grab dinner before the reading. I ask Sindram to pick a place. He likes Chipotle. As we walk to the restaurant, Sindram pokes his finger in the slots of the parking meter kiosks. At Chipotle, I order a chicken burrito. Sindram, a vegan, says that chickens eat their own feces.

Sindram can’t stop ragging on the D.C. Council. Even as we wait for the reading to begin, he rants about “poli-tricks, not politics,” with brief interludes about the values of a vegan diet. But when the humorist takes the stage, Sindram belts out a few hearty laughs. When the night ends, he thanks me for the ticket, hops on his bike, and rides back home to Brightwood.

Sindram lives in a brick condominium on Georgia Avenue. Discarded mail and newspapers fill the corners of his building’s lobby. A poorly plastered-over hole, which Sindram claims was made by a bullet from a shooting, marks a wall. I visit his third-floor apartment. The door is wide open. Inside, Sindram is only in his running shorts, complaining on the phone to police that he was hassled by a security guard while gathering food donations for the Vietnam Veterans of America. He gestures for me to wait. I stand outside, and he emerges wearing a pink collared, short-sleeved shirt, shorts, and black tennis shoes with tiny white crosses on the heels.

Sindram’s condo is less cluttered than his backpack. There’s a desk with a computer, phone, and printer. A water distiller, a small flat-screen television, and bookshelves made of black milk crates round out the furnishings. He has no bed. He says that he sleeps on the floor and that beds are bad for people’s backs. He runs electricity one circuit at a time to keep his Pepco bill low and unplugs his appliances when he’s not using them. He prefers to talk in Battleground National Cemetery next door.

But first, he wants to give me a tour of the building.

Unsurprisingly, where he lives has been the subject of a certain amount of acrimony between Sindram and the city. In a basement that reeks of sewage, he leads me to a locked plywood door and hands me a 2008 settlement agreement from the D.C. Office of Human Rights that says the condo building has until Feb. 8, 2009 to establish a building office. Sindram says the space behind the locked door is supposed to be that office. (Tenacity Group, whose Cap City Management division manages the complex, declined to comment; Cap City maintains an office for the building elsewhere, which the firm believes puts it in compliance with the settlement.) A D.C. court convicted Sindram of attempted stalking of his building’s manager. Sindram claims he is innocent and says the manager’s testimony against him was retaliation for his numerous complaints about the building. Of course, Sindram is appealing his case.

Under an oak tree in the graveyard, Sindram tells me about himself. Son of a locksmith and a homemaker, Sindram was born in Rochester, N.Y. His parents divorced when he was a teenager. Sindram says he was basically on his own at age 14 and lived with family friends and at the YMCA. He rarely speaks with his two younger sisters. After high school in 1978, he joined the 98th Division of the Army Reserves. He spent about a year in training, first in Fort Dix, N.J., and at jump school at Fort Benning, Ga. He has a scar on his right knee that he says was from a surgery to repair an injury he sustained on his last of five parachute jumps. “It was very windy that day,” he says. “I landed hard.” Sindram still served weekends with the reserves. He was a mortar man with an E-5 pay grade who was honorably discharged in 1985. He did not do any combat duty.

Sindram first came to the D.C. area in 1981. Although he didn’t have a college degree, he had won a scholarship to study government through a summer internship at Georgetown University’s Engalitcheff Institute on Comparative Political and Economic Systems. After the internship, he ditched his studies. “Coming to the Chocolate City, I was like a kid in a candy store,” he says. “A lot of skirts to chase.” He worked as a bouncer and legal researcher for defense lawyers. In 1989, as part of his paupers’ petition with the Supreme Court, he signed an affidavit saying he only earned $2,600 per year and had no assets of any value.

In the mid-1990s, Sindram was convicted of four counts of mail fraud, a conviction he is still trying to appeal. Sindram was convicted of stealing more than $82,000 by ordering goods, mostly books, through the mail under false names without paying the vendors. According to court records, Sindram received more than 100 parcels per week at two post office boxes in Colesville, Md. When postal inspectors searched his apartment and car, they seized stacks of books, unpaid invoices and $15,500 cash in $100 bills. Sindram testified that he ordered heavy books by mail to punish the postal service for closing his first post office box. “I intended to pay for the goods I ordered. It was an act of civil disobedience,” he says. “I felt that I had no rights because I was shut out of the courts. ”

The court sentenced him to 41 months in federal prison; he got out in 36 months on good behavior. “I did more time than [former Councilmember] Harry Thomas will do,” he says, referencing the disgraced ex-councilmember who was recently sentenced to 38 months for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from youth programs.

After he left prison, Sindram moved back to D.C. He says he was homeless for a spell. After he began collecting disability benefits in 2001, he was able to get an apartment. And he decided to get his degree, too. Winning scholarships and grants, he attended Columbia Union College (now Washington Adventist University) and Howard University before earning his degree in government and politics from the University of Maryland in 2005. He later studied at Washington Bible College and pursued a law degree at the University of the District of Columbia. He showed me his Howard and UDC transcripts: He earned straight As.

But he also filed Americans with Disabilities Act complaints against every university he has attended. “The closest thing to a communist entity is a college or university,” he says.

What makes Sindram do battle? At one point, after he was banned from UDC’s campus for allegations of threatening faculty members, he says the school sought to have him go to anger management classes. Instead, in 2007, Sindram went to a psychiatrist at the D.C.’s Veterans Affairs medical center to get a letter. The document says Sindram “has no history of violence against self or others” and “there is no pervasive pattern or other inappropriate behavior.” Over the years, he’s shared the letter with D.C. Councilmembers and the Office of Human Rights.

The letter attesting to Sindram’s behavior, though, doesn’t get at a more basic question: Compulsively testifying at every hearing, meeting, forum, and roundtable is not something most citizens do. On that, Sindram is uncharacteristically terse: “It’s my right,” he says.

Cut through the calls for good governance, you’ll find a lot of Sindram’s complaints are personal. He says his greatest victory was when Mayor Vince Gray, then a councilmember, helped him get a $3,442 reimbursement from Medicaid for dental implants following a 1992 bike accident that knocked out his front teeth. But the losses outweigh the wins. For instance, he is still angry that the D.C. Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking has failed to investigate his 2007 complaint that he lost more than $400 on the untimely sale of five shares of Gannett stock.

After prison, Sindram also found comfort and direction in religion. He attended the Capitol Hill Seventh-day Adventist Church and volunteered at Potomac Gardens. Teenagers at the public-housing complex still refer to Sindram as “Mister Mike” and remember him taking them to the National Zoo and the Smithsonian as kids. He says he now shuns organized religion and worships privately, reading from a camouflaged pocket Bible. He includes Bible verses and prayers in his communications with the council and the courts. For instance, a few verses from the fifth chapter of Amos appeared in one of his recent court filings. “Seek good, not evil, that you may live,” he wrote in a May 5 letter to U.S. Court of Appeals requesting that counsel be appointed to represent him in his numerous cases before the court. “Then the Lord God Almighty will be with you, just as you say he is. Hate evil, love good; maintain justice in the courts.”

Religion has influenced Sindram’s policy views, too. He regularly testifies that the D.C. Council should support a referendum on gay marriage, which he thinks the voters would reject. Not that a legislative win will matter much under Sindram’s logic because he believes we are living in the end times. “The sun is setting and time is drawing nigh. The Lord is soon to return,” he says.

All the same, Sindram reaches out to unlikely allies. He attended the May meeting of ANC 3F to lobby Alexandra Beninda, one of two transgender activists nominated to the human rights commission by Gray, to hear his complaints about the Office of Human Rights. He later testified in Beninda’s favor at a May 23 confirmation hearing chaired by Ward 8 Councilmember Marion Barry. Sindram missed his initial time to testify, but Barry gave him another opportunity. “I’m feeling generous today, so why don’t you go ahead and testify. Limit it to three minutes,” Barry told Sindram.

He hasn’t always given Sindram leeway. On March 30, 2011, Sindram filed a petition for a temporary restraining order against Barry claiming the councilmember and former D.C. mayor discriminated against him by not letting him speak at Committee on Aging and Community Affairs hearings. A D.C. court dismissed Sindram’s petition.

But Sindram, often the only public witness at D.C. Council meetings and ANC hearings, has his fans among those who listen to testimony. Joseph Vaughan, the ANC 4C chair, echoes what many have told me about D.C.’s most frequent witness: “The city would be a better place if more people were as passionate about the issues as Mr. Sindram.” Vaughan applauds Sindram’s efforts to help local veterans and says that he occasionally brings important topics to the attention of his ANC, such as the D.C. Council’s rejection of Noel. He does say Sindram would accomplish more if he stayed on topic and cut the sarcasm from his testimony. When I raise these issues with Sindram, he demurs. “The sum is the whole of its parts,” he says, chiding me and everyone else to look at the entirety of his testimony.

Sindram seems content to tilt at windmills until he slays his share of giants. He imagines one day he will settle his complaints with UDC and become a lawyer. But it doesn’t sound like that will happen soon. Under the oak tree in Battleground National Cemetery, Sindram tells me a version of a tale you may have come across in self-help books or chain emails. Basically, villagers trap a monkey by putting a coconut in a jar. The hole in the top of the jar is only as big as the coconut, so when the monkey reaches in he can grab the coconut, but can’t remove his hand from the jar because he is holding the coconut. The villagers are able to capture the monkey because he refuses to drop the coconut. Sindram says he relates to the monkey: “I won’t let go of the coconut.”

Correction: Because of reporting errors, the sections of this story that concern Michael Sindram's building originally contained several inaccuracies. The story wrongly referred to Tenacity Group as the owner of the complex. In fact, it is a condominium building, though it is managed by Cap City Management, a division of Tenacity. The building also does not have an elevator, though the original version of this story stated that the reporter had used one to visit Sindram's third floor apartment. Finally, the management company maintains an office in Takoma Park that the company believes complies with the Office of Human Rights complaint; Sindram disagrees.

Our Readers Say

I hope this guy gets the mental help he so clearly needs. I also hope the City Paper gets the help they so clearly need and don't feel a need to do a story on every whacko in the area.
With all the important stuff going on in this city, why the City Paper spent so much time on this guy is beyond me.
@ Sally: It's because the City Paper has gone down hill to the point where they don't do any real reporting any more and realize they can churn crap like this out with minimal effort.
Seriously, CP? Sindram? Okay. I suppose it's selfish of those of us who testify at Council hearings to keep this local gem to ourselves.
Mr. Sindram is becoming a Wilson building institution, to his credit. The man is clearly brilliant in his own way, much like Barry is brilliant in his own way. I'll echo what Mr. Vaughan says, the city would be better off if more citizens took a page from the Michael Sindram playbook. While Mr. Sindram has testified thousands of times, and it may be a touch excessive, most citizens have not bothered to testify even once on any issue.

Great piece.
sally - why do you bother to come the website and read the article if City paper has gone downhill so much? go away
The guy is harmless. What has he done to really make anyone feel intimidated? He's obviously really intelligent and seems to be passionante about pet peeves. I enjoyed this piece and have a newfound appreciation for him.
The City Paper has been profiling the mentally ill people as a sort of "Bedlam" "look at the loony" concept for about two years now. It's not cool City Paper. I seriously doubt that Mr. Sindram knows he was being made fun of in this piece and that's just abusive.
@will, most of us don't testify because we have a job and pay taxes to keep this city moving in the right direction and cover medical and mental health cost of people like Michael Sindram. I'd be happy to come down and testify before the council if you cover the cost of a days pay I'd lose. Michael Sindram has done nothing but become one of many Wilson Bldg pimps. Those of you who enjoyed the article are some of his willing hoes. Hope he gives you your cut for laying on your back with your legs open. Most pimps keep all the money for themselves and give the hooker nothing!
@ WilsonWonker: What part of the story indicates his advanced intelligence to you? The part where he thinks it's smart to petition the Supreme Court 42 times to decide on his $100 speeding ticket? Or maybe the part where he gets caught for mail fraud and goes to jail for 3 years? or is the section where he makes threats against his college professors? What I'm reading highlights a person barely functioning with mental illness.
Northwesterner, if the City Paper stopped covering mentally ill people, the CP would have to stop reporting on members of the City Council, the current mayor, his immediate predecessor and the "Mayor for Life."

cutthecrap makes a good case for evening and weekend Council hearings.
He was a strong opponent of DC Marriage Equality. Testified against it. so MS go take your Cray Cray self out of DC!
The disabled should be recognized. Why exploit Mr. Sindram's perceived disability? Free speech!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is new low for CP. You have emboldened a guy who harasses people in the Wilson building on a regular basis, has been banned from filing lawsuits in DC Superior Court, and has been banned from several offices for aggressive behavior. This is not called being a "squeaky wheel," this is called being a dangerous asshole.
I know Michael from seeing him around town and at every council hearing I've ever been to. Yes, he's a little eccentric, but I really like his passion. Its a shame that UDC Law didn't admit him. Yes he only scored a 143 on the LSAT, but the school has admitted many other people that were just as eccentric, who had lower scores than his.

I've seen Mr. Sindram at many meetings in Ward 4 over the years. He seemed to have some mental health issues, however, I admire him for have the guts and energy to stand up to the establishment. I've always wondered about Mr. Sindram's ethnicity. I don't know if he was white or a mulatto. However, I don't think he's worth been featured on the Washington City Paper front page.
I had many,many encounters with Michael over my two years working in the city. I have nothing but profound respect for him-and Lord knows we didn't agree on much. He is more honorable than most, cares deeply about his issues and I am actually happy that the City Paper devoted an article to him. I wish him well and hope his attempts to hold people to task continue.
I live in the same building as Michael Sindram. He is a pox upon our community. Those papers? He puts them there every single day, a hundred at a time. It's virtually impossible to keep up with collecting and disposing of them.

The office that's supposed to be there? The building can't afford to build it out. One of the reasons we can't afford to build out the unit is because Mr. Sindram has an awful habit of not paying his HOA fees, and then filing motion after motion after motion, racking up incredible legal fees whenever the building has taken him to court.

Adding to the problem, I've personally observed Mr. Sindram contaminate our recycling bins, and I believe he calls in the violation to the city so our building can be cited and fined.

He litters our hallways, makes vulgar gestures when he encounters resistance from neighbors, and takes advantage of every opportunity to destroy any semblance of community we try to create. He sues every chance he seems to get, people won't serve on the board of directors for fear they'll have to miss work or pay attorneys for dealing with Mr. Sindram's antics.

We've lost at least one good resident from our building because of Mr. Sindram, and unless he moves out, I expect we'll lose more.

Next time you're in the building, Mr. Anderson, try knocking on a few doors before you give Mr. Sindram a soapbox to bash our building community.
@ James: You're asking the City Paper to do actual reporting and investigate the subjects of their stories?! HA!!! If they start doing that, they won't be able to reliably produce the garbage that they've been churning out. It's so much easier to take the word of a person with mental health issues for all the "facts" of their article. I haven't read an article from them in a while out of disapointment. I want to like the local publication and hope it would eventually get better, so every now & then, I read something other than Savage Love & The Straight Dope, and every time I'm even more disapointed than I was the last time I decided to give it another chance.
@James: Yes, he is a bully who tries to intimidate, especially if someone disagrees with him.
One more thing: Bullshit. The reporter didn't take the elevator to Sindram's floor. There is no elevator.
Don't feed the troll, people! I guarantee Mr. Sindram will track down the author of every negative post and make his/her life a living Hell. I've seen him at many council hearing and ANC meetings. He's loud, rude and disrespectful---and especially intimidating to women. Some call it free speech, I see him as a ticking time bomb.
Michael Sindram seem to need so serious mental health counseling or he need to be admitted into Saint Elizabeths Mental Hospital. I've seen this guy at several meetings in Ward 4 and he appear to be mentally unbalanced. Why would the Washington City Paper waste their time and space writing an article on this guy? It sounds like many people are afraid of this guy because he's mentally unstable and might hurt or kill someone.
Seems like nothing more than an AW.
This man is a menance to society. He is a self proclaimed "veteran, who has served his country more than most" More than most what? Other societal leeches??? He is a disgrace to all veterans, especially those who are "truly" disabled. He is gaming the system and winng at our expense. As for his place of residence being unkempt...generally NOT true; this is a great building with great residents, all except one. He has sabotaged the building and created generally havoc from day one. It's a shame that HE is protected while the productive members of society are made to suffer!
My goodness. This guy is a NUT case. Seriously, he is mentally ill, off, etc. He is creepy and people are uncomfortable with him. He is disruptive in meetings, rude, loud, and strange. Claiming this guy is brillant ignores his OBVIOUS mental issues. Shhiiit CP, Hitler was brilliant. However, that doesn't mean anything when your cray cray CRAZY!

Why would CP give this nut job some publicity. He's most definitely someone who will go into a building one day and shoot it up. Yes, I'm serious. This guy is truly mentally ill.

Shame on you CP. Shame on you for giving this guy such a public platform. Blood is on your hands.
Who reads this crap? Tom Anderson is probably one of those who does not think that wounded in action American soldiers are "heroes." What is next for Sindram, an interview with Anderson Cooper on CNN? Nobody would view it though since nobody is watching, just like nobody is reading this drivel either. If he is so "brilliant," write him in for POTUS, probably could not do any worse than the current bloviating dolt.
A friend of mine works for the district and he harrasses her at every turn. I dont know if he is crazy or crazy like a fox...I have watched him perform at council hearings and he is a tenant one day and a home owner the next. I dont know if its just me but he cant be both. He just seems to play whatever role with get him on tv and distract people from the real issue that appears to be his mental health status. I dont know if he is mentally ill or a sociopath. That to me seems to be a bigger issue than whether he is filing unfounded petitions. Why hasnt someone attempted a mental health intervention? If he isnt determined to be mentally ill then at least his antics would be appropriately dealt with. If he is determined to be mentally ill then he can possibly get the treatment he needs. @16th Street Heights, I am unsure of what his ethnicity has to do with anything but in the future if someone is of mixed race the proper description is bi-racial... We dont use mulatto anymore GOMER...SMH
As to the question about his racial identity he is Caucasian. He is one thing we don't miss since relocating from Ward 4.
As a resident of the Takoma neighborhood,I won't comment on Mr. Sindram's mental health as there is a colorful cast of characters that reside here. However, I will say that he must have had a stable day the reporter followed him. There was no mention of him sticking his head in mailboxes or digging through trash. When he had his car it was filled with garbage. He used to bring "donations" to the school and recreation center "for the kids" of bags of trash. When I say trash I don't mean things that others don't hold value,I mean trash,bottles,paper,wrappings,trash. I have been in forums when he has gotten volatile and put people in fear. Many people view him as harmless or misunderstood. It is not a question of intelligence,many persons diagnosed or not with mental health issues are often of higher intelligence. Though I don't think you would want to come out your house in the morning and have them ,their bike and bags of trash on your stoop.
Sindram, the self proclaimed disabled veteran, still has a car which has had Virginia plates for more than 5 years now. He is allowed to park it on the dead end street behind his condo. A privelage most DC residents are not granted. He also has a "handicapped" parking permit. Apparently the mentally ill are entitled to prime parking spaces. And sadly, yes, he still collects trash, but now he routinely spreads it out in the lobby of his condo in an effort to annoy his neighbors. The mental health agency, the police, and the courts can do nothing to keep him from harassing the productive citizens in his neighborhood unless or until he threatens physical harm. He is free to intimidate and to cause as much mental anguish as he wants (especially to women)! And society continues to pay him to keep performing his antics! The joke is on us!
I also live in Mr Sindram's building and am beyond appalled by this article.

He is the one that litters and trashes our building every day. And also the reason our building cannot afford repairs. Several residents have taken out restraining orders against him because of harassment, including a former building manager that received death threats.

I thought this paper was supposed to be progressive. You're painting this guy who is a rampant racist and a homophobe as a quirky, community activist. There should be a complete retraction of this article. Interview the victims of this maniac and you might have a story worth printing.
I am familiar with this building as I have a close friend who is a neighbor of Mr. Sindram and the man is the absolute worse neighbor you could possibly have. The first time I visited this building which is so beautiful from the outside I was shocked to see the stacks of newspapers in the entryway. My friend simply said "It's my neighbor" with a look of disgust on his face. Mr. Anderson you need to dig a little deeper because this guy is absolutely horrid.
Please take the time to get to see Mr. Sindram in action. Lurking in the dark going through peoples trash, harassing neighbors, urinating in stairways....a total nightmare. I'm one of many who can no longer live in the same building with him. Imagine coming home at 3am to find him littering the common area wi th papers and propaga and like a coward he runs off. Im tired of it and i fear for the safety of my child. I'm out! Write a real story about this NUT JOB!
This guy is the worst of the worst. Ive dealt with him on multiple occasions and have found that he is simply here to be a drain on society. Everytime he is in my place of employment he asks for handouts and "favors". Never paying a dime for any services. And on the subject of him being a veteran? I think any benefits he has should be revoked. Claiming to have served more than most??? How disrespectful!! Men and women have DIED for this country!! I served as a US Marine. I would never say that I served "more than most". Further more, the last time i dealt with him, he walked out without paying and also stole the money out of my tip jar! Come on people, stop giving this guy a spotlight and just let him disappear. Please?
All I can say is mental health issues are very true with this individual. i can't understand how the court or any councils allow such foolishness and a waste of time with a person full of CRAP! The person just sighn petiotions to take anyone to court, to get you to waste your time. When unruly in court, I do not understand why his is not locked up for not obeying courtroom rules. Someone is going to take him out one day and do us all a favor. He really needs Jesus, for truly God is the Only One Who can deliver a "fool" from the devil.

Leave a Comment

Note: HTML tags are not allowed in comments.
Comments Shown. Turn Comments Off.