A More Perfect Union Station D.C.'s train station is a mess. Again.

Full Article
Photo by Darrow Montgomery

There are essentially two routes into Union Station by foot: The bad way, and the worse way.

The bad way starts in the Metro station, or along First Street NE, where the subway entrance is chiseled into a massive stone wall abutting a narrow sidewalk. Push your way through the commuters and tourists pouring on and off the Red line and shove yourself up whichever escalator to the main floor is in service when you happen to arrive. The first thing you see when you get into the train station proper is probably a line. It might be for the post office. Or maybe it’s for the train departing Gate A. Or for Sbarro. There’s no way to know, really, until you squeeze your way past it to see where it ends.

But you don’t have time for a prolonged investigation. You’ve got to hunt down a working ticket machine so you don’t miss your train. There are a few in the middle of the station, nestled between more lines, and some a longer walk away, past the shops by the Amtrak ticketing counter. So you keep pushing through the crowd. It’s loud, and getting louder; the next MARC train is boarding, so the PA system is blaring about stopping in “Savage”—which sounds about right. The lighting is of an institutional fluorescent variety that seems designed to stress you out, especially as you squint to see arrivals and departures on faraway monitors.

Finally, you stumble out into the historic section of the building, and the drab tile floors give way to shiny marble. Things might be looking up. But all you see are tour bus kiosks and tchotchke shops. Freestanding blue signs offer no direction. You spot a line ending by the stairway down to the food court, though, and sure enough, there’s the Quik-Trak unit you’ve been looking for. You print your ticket and look for your train. If you’re leaving from Gate K, way over at the eastern end of the station by McDonald’s, you’ve got to struggle your way through the fluorescent lights, the noise, and the crowds—all over again.

That’s the bad way. The worse way starts out by Columbus Circle, where your reward for scrambling across six lanes of traffic on Massachusetts Avenue NW is another few lanes of cars, taxis, and buses. There are tiny little curbs to stand on before venturing onto a barely visible crosswalk. If you make it through without giving up, you’ve got some big concrete security barriers to navigate. Then you’re in the main hall of Union Station, the part with the marble floors where travelers perch uncomfortably on granite planters. Your train, or the shop you’re looking for, is somewhere in back, through the crowds and the din.


Aren’t you glad you’re here?

For at least a decade, the plaza in front of Union Station, which should be Washington’s welcome mat, has been a national disgrace. Granite blocks fell out of their sidewalks, and pedestrians heading to the Capitol complex from the Metro wore dirt tracks in the grass where no paths existed to accommodate them. Traffic lanes had been added over the years, making it impossible to navigate for anyone other than the buses and taxis that careen around Columbus Circle. Inadequately shoveled in the winter, barely tended in the summer, it seemed to announce, “Welcome to D.C., America’s broken capital city.”

Finally, the plaza is getting a makeover. By next year, it’s supposed to re-open as a functional public space for the 100,000 people who come through every day, with expanded space for pedestrians, better lighting, and security bollards instead of concrete blocks.

But why was it allowed to get so bad in the first place?

The answer is a story of inertia and bureaucracy. Just look at its exterior for a lesson in Union Station’s dysfunctions: Columbus Plaza is no man’s land, and everyone’s. Owned by the National Park Service, it also falls within the purview of the District Department of Transportation, as well as the Union Station Redevelopment Corporation (the federally-chartered nonprofit that runs the station). All those parties hashed out an agreement back in 2004 to fix the plaza, but the details took another six years to nail down. Three different agencies—the National Capital Planning Commission, Commission on Fine Arts, and the Architect of the Capitol—had to approve the agreement first. Then, they had to figure out who would pay how much of the $7.8 million the proposed renovations would take.

That’s more or less the tale of Union Station as a whole. Five or six years ago, traffic through the station started to strain at its capacity, and changes came quickly. Ashkenazy Acquisition Corporation bought the lease to most of the station’s retail and launched a major overhaul, kicking out downmarket tourist shops and eateries and bringing in chains like Chop’t and Chipotle. Intercity bus companies wanted to start operating from the Union Station parking deck rather than city streets. In 2006, local developer Akridge won the rights to the air over 15 acres of train tracks, and started planning a 3 million square foot complex of offices, retail, and apartments.

Now, the District wants to renovate the entrance to the Metro, which hasn’t changed since it opened in 1976, and find a way to tie in the streetcar that will eventually run on H Street NE. Amtrak and Maryland’s MARC commuter service have projected massive ridership increases in future years, and are thinking about how to expand service.

That’s a lot to handle with a historic, federally-owned building that has no one boss, and only a non-voting representative in Congress to fight for the funding it needs to grow. In 2008, billions of dollars in stimulus spending finally became available for improvements, and Union Station landed some of it to replace escalators up to the parking deck. But there was no overall master plan to guide the station’s redevelopment, which would make a better case for bigger grants—or resolve conflicts, such as when the District wanted its streetcar line to run through an underpass beneath the station, and Amtrak wanted that space for itself.

Those close to the discussions are very hesitant to talk publicly about intra-station turf battles. Several say relations are a lot better today than they were a year ago. On the record, all the interested parties dwell on the station’s enormous potential, and indeed, it’s hard to overestimate. In 15 years, Union Station could be something much more catalytic: a portal for high-speed rail service that will get people from here to New York in 90 minutes, the hub of a streetcar system that stretches from Oklahoma Avenue NE to Washington Circle, the beating heart of a new mixed-use neighborhood that knits NoMa together with H Street. It could be a place you don’t just go to in order to get somewhere else. But all that has a price tag that hasn’t even been determined yet. It’s likely north of a billion dollars—and only $80 million is currently accounted for.

“The vision for the city is huge,” says Ken Sparks, the former Federal City Council president who conceived of the USRC in the ’80s and is consulting for it today. “I think it’s probably the most exciting thing happening in Washington.”

That’s the future, though. The recent past and present look a little drearier.

No matter how inhospitable Union Station can seem today, it’s a Swiss airport compared to 1981, when the building shut down as a public hazard 74 years after it first opened. The station had fallen with the city, as train ridership decreased and facilities went into severe disrepair. A National Visitors Center required a constant stream of federal subsidies, and Union Station didn’t do a very good job of introducing tourists to the city right outside.

That sad state of affairs demanded a drastic response. Congress set up the USRC in 1982 with a mandate to preserve the building and create an indoor mall that would make the station financially independent. They allocated $180 million to make it happen, and by 1988, it had: The resulting restoration was widely celebrated as the renovation Daniel Burnham’s majestic train station deserved. (A heavy metal cube in a glass case, the Urban Land Institute’s 1991 award to USRC for executing the turnaround, still holds pride of place in the main hall.)

USRC president David Ball witnessed the station’s first rebirth, having started at the corporation in 1984. Now, he’s the guy in charge of the next one. The USRC office is tiny, with only four staffers in an office on G Street NE, in the station’s shadow. Ball himself is placid and polite, and on the morning we meet in the station’s main hall, wears a D.C. baseball cap like you might get at one of the tourist shops nearby. It was a rainy day, and netting spanned the hall to keep plaster from falling on peoples’ heads, further darkening an already shadowy space. I wonder aloud if it’s typical for the interior to be so dim.

“Nothing’s typical in this building,” Ball responds wryly. Greeting the shoe shiners and maintenance guys by name as we stroll through the station, he knows every quirk of and tweak that’s been made to the building over its 104-year lifespan. There are, for example, the pilasters in the east hall that look like marble, but are only painted. “They were always cutting costs,” he says.

Ball, who made $183,000 in salary and benefits last year, has been under some pressure lately. USRC collects rent from Ashkenazy and the parking garage to the tune of $10 million per year for maintenance, planning, and improvements. But its financial statements don’t include an itemized budget, prompting D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton to ask the Department of Transportation’s Inspector General for a yearly audit, citing “increasing evidence that USRC may not be able to meet its mandate to be self-supporting.”

“I don’t feel like I know anything about Union Station,” Norton says. “I don’t recall that we had any hearings on Union Station after the renovation of Union Station in the ’80s. And that was a big mistake. You never leave a massive government property with the feeling that nobody’s watching it.”

Union Station management first ticked Norton off in 2008, when photographers complained of being hassled after trying to take pictures in the main hall. She held hearings in 2008 and 2009, and was irked by the realization that nobody could articulate a cohesive vision for the station’s future.

Ball says things were moving forward. “The stakeholders were all conscious,” he says. “There may not have been a formalized master plan, but the stakeholders all understood the importance of what we were trying to develop here.”

That might be true. But it’s not enough to make the case to anyone else that development should be supported. Union Station has already missed out on grants that would have redone the Metro entrance and built elevators to a new streetcar connection. USRC estimates its wish list will cost a total of $450 million, and right now, it’s unclear where most of that money will come from.

“Without Union Station looking like it is spunky and raring to go, as the new destination spot for transportation and mixed use, it’s going to be difficult to get the attention of the federal government, and a lot of the money has to come from the federal government,” Norton says. “So Union Station needs to be a centerpiece in order for Congress to focus on it like they did when they renovated it. Congress is used to people who want to get something done saying, ‘Wow, this is what we want to get done, isn’t this terrific? What do you think of this?’ Instead, we had to push them, to do what should have been obvious.”

Even after its renovation 25 years ago, Union Station was torn between its various identities. Was it mostly a train station, or mostly a shopping mall? Did it cater to visitors, or to people who lived in D.C.? The stands selling state flags and historical Americana seemed aimed at tourists. The basement movie theater, which closed two years ago, drew boisterous crowds of locals.

That split sense of purpose is still evident today, even if the stalls selling knicknacks to folks from out of town have been replaced by higher-end shops like Aerosoles and Oakley. Take a look at the food court, which is practically the official dining destination of every Future Farmers of America delegation that visits Congress, but which also draws workers from the newer office complexes in NoMa.

Which is why a building serving as many different constituencies as Union Station should have one underlying master plan that takes into account the needs of all the station’s tenants. As visions evolve for new renovations, the station’s finite size inevitably creates conflicts: intercity buses vs. tour buses, retail vs. Amtrak waiting areas, train tracks vs. streetcar tracks.

Just this year, the station took on a whole new role by serving as an intercity bus terminal. A few weeks ago, a small cluster of executives and public-relations types huddled together with a dancing mascot on the parking deck, where lines of travelers now shiver on the open tarmac. The suits were there for speeches and a ribbon cutting to celebrate the arrival of Megabus, now officially housed at the station after having been shunted from various Washington curbs to the old convention center site to a parking lot at North Capitol Street and K Street NW.

The pomp was justified. Getting all six intercity bus lines housed on the parking deck had required years of browbeating from Norton and “countless” meetings in her office. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood himself was in on some of them, and his deputy John Porcari—a Marylander who sits on USRC’s board—attended those LaHood couldn’t make. “It was really Union Station administration that really made it slow for many, many years,” says Peter Pantuso, president of the American Bus Association. “It was really the involvement of LaHood and Porcari that made it happen quickly.”

Solving one problem, though, created another. The arrival of Megabus and Bolt squeezed out the charter tour buses who’ve long paid $20 per day to park there while their charges got lunch in the station and wandered Capitol Hill. Come spring tourist season, they’ll have to drop people off at the station and go to some as yet undetermined other spot. The only options now, RFK Stadium and the Crummell School lot on New York Avenue NE, are both far enough away that bus drivers might choose not to go there at all, but rather drive around on D.C.’s streets. On top of that, USRC is talking about hiking the fee to $50, and it’s driving the tour companies batty. Worldstrides, an educational tour company that runs 2,200 buses through the station each spring, sees no good options on the table. “To lose 20 minutes, half hour, just to pick up at Union Station, is going to be a killer for us, just logistically,” says Rob Teweles, Worldstrides’ director of sightseeing.

Then there’s all the stuff to buy. In a city that doesn’t have many malls, Union Station is as close as it gets. Ashkenazy, which is trying to make good on the $160 million it paid for the 84-year lease in 2007, has been systematically repositioning the retail to turn it into more of a Ritz Carlton than a Holiday Inn. The British chain Pret a Manger and a peppy frozen yogurt shop now occupy the former home of Union Wine & Liquor (which reopened downstairs this fall).

Currently, the biggest question is how to deal with the former movie theater, which is now a huge lost revenue stream for Ashkenazy. To lease it, they need more foot traffic to the food court, which means creating a vertical passageway from the main floor. Cutting holes in historic buildings, though, is no easy task, as Ashkenazy found out when they proposed two glass elevators going up through the elevated café in the middle of the main hall, twined in spiral staircases.

To those familiar with the station’s history, the plan was a reminder of the visitors center “pit” that had existed even before the movie theater. Preservationists revolted, burying Ashkenazy with negative comments. The issue died down, until the developer came back with a modified plan that would get rid of the center café entirely, freeing up sightlines by uncluttering the hall, and only cutting two modest holes for escalators to the basement. It didn’t completely mollify opponents, who still question why any holes are necessary.

Preservationist-esque worries extend further than aesthetics, though. Over the years, Ashkenazy and its predecessor added a lot more retail than Union Station had decades ago, when it handled 50 percent more people than it does today. If bus, streetcar, and train traffic reach the level that’s expected, things could get rather cramped.

While packing the floors full of as many shops as possible, Ashkenazy is also trying to avoid paying taxes on them. For the past several years, USRC and the developer have asked the D.C. Council to waive its “possessory interest tax,” a way of charging property taxes on federal land that amounts to about $3 million per year. During Norton’s hearings, an Ashkenazy executive—who didn’t return calls or emails for this story—forecasted an “inevitable downward spiral” if the tax stayed in effect, calling it “the largest threat to the future success to Union Station [with] the potential to unwind two decades of revitalization.”

The D.C. Council hasn’t heeded the firm’s entreaties. It’s pretty hard to buy the case that retailers like Victoria’s Secret and Express can’t pay property taxes like they would anywhere else in the city (and if they can’t, maybe Ashkenazy is charging them too much in rent). But Ashkenazy isn’t giving up. This spring, USRC sued the District in federal court, claiming the tax was unconstitutional. USRC and Ashkenazy say they plan to chip in $80 million for the station’s renovations, and they’d rather not have to pay the District as well.

Litigation doesn’t make it easy for the city to work with the station management on other projects. DDOT, for example, would like to push for legislation that would enable it to pass on federal grants to USRC—but councilmembers tend to remember that Union Station is trying to get out of paying taxes. “It would be great to get it settled, because it is a problematic thing that holds back relations,” says Steve Strauss, DDOT’s point person on the station.

As much as Union Station’s future is multipurpose, it’s still fundamentally a train station: The driving force behind redevelopment is Amtrak.

The administration of Barack Obama—and his famously Amtrak-dependent vice president—has talked big about passenger rail. Last fall, Amtrak came out with an aspirational plan for high-speed rail along the Northeast corridor, with trains traveling from Boston to Washington at 220 miles per hour. That’s still fantasy for now; this year’s federal budget includes no money for high-speed rail (austerity and bullet trains don’t mix easily). Nonetheless, Amtrak is almost ready to release its own sweeping master plan that would provide for Japanese-style locomotives in the future, as well as increase capacity for regular train service. Trains with more cars would move in and out faster, waiting areas would be refinished, and platforms would be rebuilt so passengers could board on either side. More entrances to the station would open it up to the surrounding neighborhood. All of that could be great news if it comes together, but until then, the station’s future is tied to Amtrak’s, and to Congress’, willingness to put money into passenger rail.

While that plan coalesces, USRC has a list of things that can be done in the station if funds become available: replace the escalators up to the parking deck, build a new passenger waiting area and ticketing center for Greyhound buses, complete a pedestrian passageway from the Metro station to H Street that’s sat unfinished.

But despite Amtrak’s best intentions, many of the critical components are beholden to their timeline.

One such thing was the streetcar. Until Amtrak got enough money for new tracks through the underpass that comes out through a door in the stone wall on H Street, DDOT wanted to use it for a streetcar stop. (At the time, nobody was sure who owned the wall; USRC had to dispatch a consultant to do a title search, which concluded that it belongs to the feds.) Amtrak indicated that would be possible, but later decided it would need the area as a staging ground for realigning the tracks above, forcing DDOT to scramble for inferior alternatives.

Another is better signage. The station desperately needs this to help people find their way around, and USRC has retained a team that includes Lance Wyman, the guy who designed Metro’s map. But it’s difficult to tell people where to go when it’s unclear where things will be.

The third thing is vastly bigger: Akridge’s plans for the air rights over Amtrak’s tracks, for which they paid $10 million in 2006 and have been trying to advance ever since. Called Burnham Place after the station’s original architect, this is the project that would really make Union Station into something special, connecting Capitol Hill to downtown.

“If we do our job right, Burnham Place becomes a crossroads,” says Akridge project manager David Tuchmann. “If you go out the south side, you’re at the seat of power. If you go the other direction, you’re in an H Street neighborhood.”

There’s lots to do while Amtrak straightens out its plans. This year, Akridge got a whole new zoning district called Union Station North, which involved fighting the preservationists who thought having tall buildings visible behind the station would somehow insult its grandeur. It took hours of testimony to work out whether the height of the new buildings would be measured from the ground or from the top of the H Street bridge. With the help of density advocates like planning director Harriet Tregoning, Akridge won the right to take the higher measurement.

But Akridge’s architect, the prolific local firm Shalom Baranes, can’t get started on designs until there’s some certainty to Amtrak’s vision. Building a deck over the tracks, for example, will have to be done bit by bit, so Amtrak can keep trains in service during construction. If Amtrak adds more tracks that go under the H Street bridge, it might have to be elevated, which would throw off their calculations. The newly realigned tracks will determine where Akridge can sink pillars on which to build their deck.

“The sands are shifting beneath our project,” says Matt Klein, president of Akridge. (The company's founder, Chip Akridge, had offered to push the process quicker by putting together a Union Station master plan, Norton said, but it wasn’t his job.) “So until the sands settle, it’s hard to get down to the nitty gritty of architecture.”

Walk into Union Station’s main entrance sometime after Columbus Plaza is finally finished, and the chaos that makes it such an unpleasant place now should be a bit calmer. But even if all goes well, it’ll be succeeded by a more ordered chaos: Thousands more people coming in and out of a new office complex behind the tracks, onto trains that will whisk them anywhere on the eastern seaboard in hours, or aboard streetcars bound for newly revitalized areas east of the river. A modern, new concourse will funnel commuters onto lower level tracks on their way home to Maryland and Virginia. Bus riders will wait in an enclosed structure, shielded from the drafts that slice across a parking lot elevated high above the ground.

You might go there just for dinner, or to buy some pants, or spend an hour chatting with a friend. Instead of a way of dividing the city into east and west, it’ll be a place where the two halves mesh.

You can almost see it, too, from the very top of the parking deck, looking down to the vast area of tracks below. Ball, who observers say seems energized by the quicker pace of change over the last year and a half, tries to explain something that hasn’t even been fully designed yet.

“If you’re looking down there, that’s not Union Station today,” he says. “But it could be Union Station tomorrow.”

Correction: Due to a reporting error, this story originally incorrectly identified Chip Akridge. He is the founder of Akridge, but he is not related to company president Matt Klein.

Photo Slideshow: Union Station

Our Readers Say

Interesting article but you completely forgot to mention all the earthquake damage
Which is going to cost millions to repair. That will put on hold any other renovations.
Theres a huge mesh net hanging in the main hall to keep plaster from falling. Im just
glad that horrible movie theater closed.
I have NEVER understood why people diss Union Station. It's by far and away the best train station in the country in all facets. Ever been to the dingy and dismal Grand Central? It's name exudes grandeur, but the reality is subpar at best.

Union Station meanwhile is clean, bustling with quality (if chain) retail, and gorgeous. The minor quibbles are typical DC transient whining about tiny things, making mountains out of molehills. The National Mall - now that's the real travesty. Or Pennsylvania Ave... or 16th St with it's towering black fences and lack of vitality. But Union Station???
I've never heard people diss Union Station, but as Lydia's title points out, its about making a "more perfect" station. The great things can always be improved.
@ RT --

I'm a third-generation native Washingtonian and have lived all but six years of my life here, so my complaints about Union Station are not "D.C. transient whining." And I think the retail sucks and the working train station part of it is a crowded madhouse. The fact that the building itself is so grand only makes the failures inside that much more disappointing; the station ought to be made to live up to its architecture.



I've got to say Lydia, I think you're making a mountain out of a mole hill here. Yes, Union Station could be improved, and some of those improvements are underway (esp. Columbus Circle revitalization). But a lot of your critiques are off-base and I would hardly call the station a mess and even try to compare it to what it was in the late 70's. Moreover, I was completely perplexed by your criticism of the great hall, which is recognized as one of the most beautiful spaces in all of DC. In my experience, it's one of the spaces that visitors to the city are most impressed by. Do you really think it's too dismal and chaotic? Would you rather have them install drop down ceilings with bright lights and create established foot paths for the crowds to make things more orderly? Is that your idea of a vibrant train station and shopping complex? You sometimes produce good stuff Lydia, but I've also noticed that you have a tendency to make half-baked arguments in which you engage in petty griping and bitching about things that really aren't big problems, particularly when compared to the many other design and planning issues in DC (case in point-lamenting the loss of parked tour buses in the garage to make way for inter-city buses?!?!?! are you kidding me?). I have no problem with you pointing out things that can be improved, but I do find it annoying when you exaggerate and blow things out of proportion to fabricate a problem that doesn't exist.
Great article. Union Station's unrealized potential is staggering. That it is virtually cut off from the H St neighborhoods is ridiculous.
Union Station is cool. Watch the reaction of tourists as they walk inside the main hall. And train stations are supposed to be crowded. That's nature of squeezing hundreds of people into long tube-like vehicles. It beats being stuck inside a car on the interstate, surrounded by other cars.

Any time the federal government is involved in a project of this magnitude, the time to get it started / finished will be at LEAST four times what it really should take, plus cost a MINIMUM four to ten times more than it should. Cases in point - the Ronald Reagan building and the US Capitol visitors center.

Unfortunately, that is the nature of any large real estate project involving our wonderful federal and DC government. You just have to hope it turns out well and overlook the tremendous waste of money that will occur. Our representatives may know something about crafting laws and policy, but they are absolutely terrible when it comes to managing real estate projects.
I used to take Amtrak to Richmond fairly regularly back in the 1970s; it was cold, ugly and inefficient. The station today is like the station in "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington" -- beautiful. I have never had the issues described getting into the station from Columbus Circle. I regularly walk to and through the station both for local and long distance train services and local and long distance bus services. Could things be improved? Certainly, but the description here is exaggeratedly bad and generally unhelpful.
I find that as a train station, Union Station does the job, but it's decidedly more irritating when I'm trying to meet a friend in the neighborhood. It is a bit hard to get in and out and while it doesn't look chaotic, it certainly seems kind of cluttered and confused. The biggest travesty to me is how bureaucracy has stifled work around the station, which I didn't really know about until I read this article. Thanks for this.
I find it annoying when "journalists" hyperbolically paint a negative picture to tell the story they want to tell rather than the reality. A visitor reading that story would not be given an accurate portrayal. Is it perfect? No. The back is particularly uninspiring, but it's still a very pleasant experience overall and a place I'm drawn to when I'm in the area. If you want to diss a train station, try New York's Penn Station or Detroit's Michigan Central. Bring some bolt cutters for the latter.
Agreed with some of the commenters. This article is making a mountain out of a molehill, waxing poetically for the sake of reaching whatever the writer's wordcount. The station is by no means perfect, but it's lovely and get's the job done. There's no way to merge the complexity and necessity of the train portion into the beauty of the rest of the station, nor should they be merged.

The station sits as a fantastic entry point to the city for the northeast corridor and does so in a way that few other train stations around the country can claim.

Go find something else to nitpick.
This article is not hyperbolic. I work at one of the upscale boutiques in the station and I can say for a fact that the politics there are crazy and only getting worse. It's interesting to watch so many different groups try to impose their vision on the Station. It's a gorgeous building and it needs to be improved, and this article really captures the tangled, stop-and-start, politically charged minefield that is Union Station.

I think your caps lock key is stuck. It's over on the left hand side of your keyboard. If you hit it you will be able to type without all caps.
"...a building serving as many different constituencies as Union Station should have one underlying master plan that takes into account the needs of all the station’s tenants."

Kind of. This is a great sentiment, but as someone who works for a different but also large organization that must satisfy the needs of many different groups, focusing on this as a solution to problems can be a big mistake. That's because there is no guarantee that it is even possible to create such a master plan - and as a result it is frustratingly easy for big organizations to spend years doing nothing but negotiating and wordsmithing, only to end up with a plan big and vague enough to cover everyone's needs. There is no end to examples of planning documents that illustrate this problem.

What the station needs instead is a clear and agreed-on organizational process that will allow these different groups to move ahead with plans even when there is not total agreement. It should really be about coordination of efforts, because not every problem requires a billion dollars.

As one example, it should not be difficult to rearrange the kiosks and floating signage to improve flow and use in the short term - this could precede major structural renovations and make life happier for thousands of station users. A few smaller efforts like this can go a long way toward building the momentum that is ultimately needed to complete (and fund) larger projects.

and P.S. - commenter RT above, I believe you are thinking of Penn Station, the rat-hole that Amtrak uses in NYC. Grand Central only connects subway lines and Metro-North, and it is indeed quite grand. They film movies in the great hall, with its famous clock and vaulted, star-filled ceiling.
@KatyV - The hyperbole isn't in regard to the politics underlying decisions. It's in reference to the way the author described the physical appearance and experience of the station. Having spent a great deal of time there, she is wrong and clearly trying to portray Union Station's physicality in a very negative light to support the story she wants to tell.
@Homino -- Fair enough. I do agree that her criticism were somewhat nitpicky (for example, the size of the cross walks in front of the station...are those really that bad?). I guess I just didn't take notice of her exaggeration because everything is pretty terrible in the main hall right now so this article just mirrors my personal feelings while all the earthquake damage is being slowly repaired. The station isn't very pretty right now. Even at its best I believe the food court and the Amtrak corridor (between McDonalds and Sbarro) are sort of downscale and gross compared to the main hall or the facade of the building.
In short, I wish someone would step in with money and clout and make Union Station live up to its potential. Too bad.
Good to see that someone at City Paper is writing about something a little more complex than craft beers or going-nowhere local bands. Ms DePillis tends to nitpick, but give her credit -- she is a real reporter who will take on challenging topics.

I spend a ton of time in Union Station going between NY and DC and lately the station seems to be in a transitional phase. The age of its renovation is starting to show; so are its identity problems. The article points out the difficulty for the place to leverage its assets and to reconcile the needs of different constituents/interest groups.

Although if you want to see a station that is a real dunghole, spend time in Penn in NYC. Talk about a mess...
It amazes me that the author complains about crowding. Union Station is first and foremost a TRAIN STATION! Of course it's busy, especially Mon-Fri. Stop crying. I've worked for Amtrak at Union Station for 18 years now and have seen increases in passengers every year. This past year we broke a ridership record of 30 million! Union Station is like the hub of a wagon wheel in the system, one of the busiest stations we have. During WW2 the guard had to be called in for crowd control and the main hall closed off, with 200,000 people in the most beautiful room in DC. That's what a Terminal station does is move PEOPLE, get over it!
I agree with the posters above: Union Station isn't as terrible as this article suggests. In fact, it's better than most train stations I've been to in the US, e.g., 30th St. Station in Philly.

My biggest (only?) complaint about Union Station is the gate area. Lydia's right when she gripes about the lighting. Blecch. But fix that, and I think it would be fine.
It seems people are confusing the criticism of the station's functionality as a transportation hub (which is both legitimate and accurate) with a critique of the station's architecture and grandeur.

The station's architecture is fantastic, but that also has little to do with how it functions on a day to day basis. People in the comments seem to acknowledge that the gate area sucks and is insufficient, yet this is the most important part of a train station's daily job.
Union Station's bathrooms were a disaster last spring.

Most Amtrak stations need huge amounts of investment. Penn Station in Baltimore is another beautiful building with lousy maintenance.

Train stations should be destinations and the centers of economic prosperity. They are an afterthought in so many places.
@Lydia, you wrote this: "Over the years, Ashkenazy and its predecessor added a lot more retail than Union Station had decades ago, when it handled 50 percent more people than it does today. "

Did you mean to write, "...decades ago...it handled 50 percent FEWER people..."?

Also, the soldiers in the loft of the Great Hall, were they revised along the way with new arms holding shields, bowdlerizing the statues to cover up private parts? Inquiring minds want to know.
the soldiers were orginally naked, and we covered up
with the shields when the station was being completed.
@Cherubini, I thought I was making a joke, by repeating an urban myth about those statues. Really, it's true? Amazing.
It is dispiriting that the big, handsome waiting room clock has stopped. A sign of neglect?
@Trulee Pist

Nope, you read that right. After World War II, the station had a ton more trains and people going through it (just like the city used to have 800,000 people in it).

And yeah, at least according to David Ball, the shields are there out of modesty.
I like what you guys are up too. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the superb works guys Iˇve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it'll improve the value of my web site :)
Yesterday I went to the food court downstairs for lunch with friends. I hadn't been there for a couple of years. Yes, it was crowded with people but there lines were short because there are so many choices for food. The huge problem was not enough tables and chairs. I'd estimate that there are easily 25% fewer tables and chairs than two years ago. There are now large spaces that are wide open with nothing in them. Is this for standing room? What happened? We aren't even in the middle of real tourist season when the schools are out. I won't be going back any time soon. What a shame. This has to be hurting the businesses down there.

Leave a Comment

Note: HTML tags are not allowed in comments.
Comments Shown. Turn Comments Off.