The three dozen parents-to-be at the George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates building on a recent Tuesday night fill the lobby’s waiting room seats and overflow onto office chairs that have been dragged into the room for the occasion. By all appearances, it’s a high-end D.C. crowd: Suits and spectacles, ages that range from the middle years of childbearing to the late ones. There’s copious note-taking about birth outcomes, labor options, and this particular practice’s set of rules—No sugar! No processed foods! Daily exercise!—for natural childbirth.
Welcome to “Meet the Midwives” night at one of Washington’s newest, most talked-about labor-and-delivery operations, a place where the admissions process can be as coveted as that of the most pedagogically up-to-date preschool.
Midwifery once evoked images of giving birth at an organic farm, but GW’s Wisdom Midwifery works in a hospital setting—low-tech and high-touch, sure, but just steps away from cutting-edge medical expertise. In an age that fetishizes slow food and iPhones, it’s a potent combination.
In its 16 months at GW, the practice has grown from one nurse-midwife delivering 10 babies a month to four of them delivering 30, the maximum their time-intensive model can handle. There are plans to hire a fifth midwife. Meanwhile, there’s a waiting list out to July, and most months already have the maximum of 10 people on the list. Some women say they call Wisdom the day they find out they’re pregnant.
Tonight, the pitch is simple: Instead of being hooked to an IV in a hospital bed, Wisdom’s moms can labor in an aqua tub, take warm showers, receive massages, and move around into different birth-facilitating positions (one of the midwives pops into a squat to demonstrate). Rather than discussing epidurals, there’s talk of raising natural oxytocin levels through yogic heart-opening. And there’s a promise that the midwife—“birth provider,” in 2011 terminology—will be on hand through it all, rather than simply arriving for the big finale.
“We’re in the business of giving women what they want,” says Whitney Pinger, GW’s director of midwifery services. “They don’t want to fight to get what they want. We are their birth plan.”
Among a network of holistic-minded mamas who chat in Washington’s yoga studios and childbirth education classes, Pinger doesn’t even need to use her last name. In online maternal message boards, her work gets described in capital letters. “I absolutely LOVE her. Whitney is amazing in every way,” gushed a member of DC Urban Moms in a recent comment. The 51-year-old certified nurse midwife is a veteran of the local scene. After running programs at Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University Hospital, she came to GW last year, arriving like the LeBron of the up-market natural childbirth community.
You’d imagine Pinger’s practice appeals to those expecting mothers who admire her collaboration of crunchy and clinical. But at the Foggy Bottom medical center, she’s also demonstrated her standing among hospital administrators. They’ve come to see her as a practitioner who brings the sort of devoted following that allows a new practice to grow with little formal advertising.
Pinger is thus a pretty good example of how midwifery has become a significant business. She sensed the demand after she started Wisdom as a pilot project at Washington Hospital Center. It grew beyond what the facility could handle, so she looked for another home. GW bought in. (Since the move, the practice has officially been known as Midwifery Services at George Washington University Hospital.) In addition to the medical and teaching benefits, the logic went, a practice like Pinger’s also promised to bring new patients into the GW system—patients that are educated, privately insured, and likely to be making their family’s medical decisions for the next 18 or so years. That’s the sort of stuff that can make a calculator-wielding hospital administrator go all touchy-feely.
Pinger’s argument at the open house is simpler: “We have amazing outcomes,” she tells the expecting couples. “Among the best in the country.” About 95 percent of her clients deliver vaginally, 80 percent without any intervention. Wisdom’s cesarean section rate is approximately 5 percent, vastly lower than the nation’s rate of 33 percent.
It’s not just Pinger. Midwives across the area say they’re having a moment. Though the percentage of births they handle remains small—nationally, they do just 8 percent of the country’s annual 4 million births—midwives beyond Pinger’s cadre report a new interest in their service. Pinger’s former employer, Washington Hospital Center, didn’t have room to accommodate Wisdom last year, but has brought on two full-time and three part-time midwives since Pinger left; its new service can accommodate 30 women a month. “Midwifery has gone mainstream,” says Ursula Sabia Sukinik, a local doula, midwife assistant, and childbirth educator. (Full disclosure: I took a childbirth class with Sukinik earlier this year.)
In fact, demand right now seems to outpace supply. At the “Meet the Midwives” session, a woman asks about her chances of getting off the wait list. Her due date is March 30. But March, a popular time for births, has been full for months. “I’ll call myself April,” she says. It’s hard to tell if she’s joking.





Our Readers Say
As a doula I've seen the good work that Whitney and her practice have done, and I'm very glad they're here doing what they do, but the midwives of FHBC deserve some attention, too.
I mention FHBC and also BirthCare in Alexandria as examples of midwifery care that is not catering to Washington elites. FWIW, I don't necessarily believe that GW's Midwifery Center is - I am inclined to think this article is extraordinarily editorialized.
http://woahbaby.wordpress.com/2011/11/10/midwives-the-louboutin-of-birth-experiences/
What a great story!! Congratulations to the mothers, to the physicians, nurses and administrators at GW Hospital, and of course to Whitney and the midwives who have joined with her to create this wonderful option for childbearing families. WOW!
1.) change most often comes from the top down when informed, powerful women get involved in making the change. This article highlights that and will increase the momentum to make this care avaialble to all women.
2.)Whitney Pinger is an incredible, savvy, change agent who has contributed enormously to assisting in bringing about the paradigm shift needed to establish a team approach to care that is safe, satisfying and affordable - regardless of setting. She is defining midwifery as a specialty different, but compatable with obstetrics and putting it on the organizational table of the institutions that care for 99% of the women in America.
Brava! Brava!
NOw we have to open up the flow of tax payer money that supports hospital residency programs to include midwifery. 80 years of demonstration has produced more than enough solid evidence on the benefits of the midwife as part of the team providing care. If we contiue to primarily suport the training of sugeons to control the care of childbearing women, we should not be surprised at a rising cesarean section rate. It is time to step up the production of this missing provider in our health care system. Midwives cannot be part of the solution if they are denied access to the clinical teaching sites caring for the 99% of childbearing women.
This is the advocacy that these powerful women experiencing midwifery care need to take on. Disadvantaged women facing the problems daily survival can help but strong leadership by powerful, connected women and men who know how to navigate the system will be essential.
However,the midwife that delivered me at fhbc moved and is one of the partners at the the GW practice so I was going to GW more for her than anything else. I missed the sweet, quiet and the lovely family aesthetic of fhbc but I loved my choice to see my midwife again. Both were great natural births and I liked having the choice to see a midwife in both settings. I guess that the beauty of it; the choice. Also, I am no gym-buffed amazon lawyer and none of the women I met were either so I think that's a bit of a mis-representation and maybe just represents dc ( at least NW) and not an author or practice bias.
Susan - thanks for that information on the political side of things! I didn't know about HR 1054.
Kea, I think I'd like to see your parts 2,3 and 4 written by other authors.
sarah (lewis) juliusson
I'll second the above commenters criticism of elitism. The out of pocket cost was higher for a homebirth than the out of pocket cost of a hospital birth (midwife or not), even though the overall real cost was significantly lower. The real cost savings was for my insurer. We chose that option not to save our insurer $$ but because it was our preferred birth experience and fortunately for us we could afford it. All the "powerbrokers" and "Crossfit" moms referenced here just had the bulk of the cost billed to their insurers, who sadly will pay hospitals perfuntorily yet often place obstacles for midwives to get fairly reimbursed for their services
If people had a united voice instead of bickering about which practice was first and who qualifies as elitist then maybe more people would understand the advantages of midwifery. It is the author's voice that people should be commenting on - not Whitney's.
Midwifery should not be dismissed as some weird backwards fad, or an option reserved for the privileged (or as "Lonnie B" seems to think, the selfish). We had amazing birth experiences that were positive for me AND my babies, who were all born healthy with no complications. Whitney was very supportive throughout my pregnancy, and trusted my intuition and experience as a third-time mom throughout the delivery process. And why is it bad or selfish to want a wonderful birth experience? Birthing does not have to be a scary, surgical, highly medical ordeal, and by pushing midwives out of hospital settings, hospitals and doctors unfairly leave women with a choice between home or center births and hospital births with OBs who opt for the scalpel 1/3 of the time (or more). Not everyone is a good candidate for a midwife birth, but I am so grateful the option was there for us. I hope midwifery is here to stay.
She is human, just like the rest of us. Instead of slandering her, consider that she may have been up all night helping a woman achieve a natural birth before seeing patients the next morning. Or she may have had a woman in labor at the same time she was seeing patients. Or she was booked with 20+ appointments in 3 hours. I know from my own experience, and from talking with so many women who have worked with Whitney, that 99.9% of us had a good experience with her.
I agree with Lyla: It is the author’s voice people should be taking issue with. The slanted portrayal of midwifery in general, and Whitney specifically, is divisive. Whitney and other midwives in DC and across the U.S. are all working hard to make normal birth an option -- even a standard of care -- for all women. Let’s applaud them and ask how we can make normal birth a right for more women, no matter their income or healthcare setting.
As others have stated, I'm not sure why the author chose to portray Wisdom's clientele as exclusive. I am self-employed (and was low income at the time) with a crappy individual insurance plan, but I had no issues with access. Wisdom's place at GW allows them to use the hospital's infrastructure and consequently accept a wide range of insurance plans. Some may criticize them for not being accessible to the uninsured but it sounds like there are other services in the area that serve that purpose.
Your hospital is not the first to model this care. What is your epidural rate? Have you looked into the IHS statistics? Did you know that many hospital in Denver have been modeling this care for 5 plus years? You should have made clear that while your model is new at that hospital,the concept is not. That there are many facilities and midwifery groups around the country that have worked very hard to establish their practices.
Leave a Comment