The Selling of Walmart How the world's biggest retailer won over D.C. without a fight

Page 3 of 3

The rap on Walmart has long been its downsides for poor people: low wages, unattainable benefits, disrespect from managers, forced overtime, intimidation of attempts to unionize. In D.C., the company made a concerted effort to win over folks who might have the greatest problem with that—and turned a few into its most effective advocates.

Late last year, Lori Kaplan, executive director of the Latin American Youth Center, was invited to the Walmart Foundation’s downtown offices, where executives asked her to submit a grant application for her organization. She got it: $125,000 for youth summer enrichment, a lifeline at a time when the District’s Summer Youth Employment Program had been slashed dramatically.

At a February meeting at the Columbia Heights accounting firm Ayala & Associates, Kaplan and a dozen representatives from other Latino groups met Walmart officials including Tony Waller, the company’s Puerto Rican senior director for corporate affairs and constituent relations. “I appreciate that they are willing to reach out to youth groups and the Latino community and sort of share their story, because since they never really were in Washington, my sense was stuff the press had said over the years,” Kaplan says. “From the Youth Center’s point of view, Walmart coming to Washington is a good thing. We would really like to develop a deeper partnership where we can be a source of employees, but also a place where employees won’t just stay in the in the lowest-level retail position, but get the training to move up.”

In early November last year, several D.C. leaders were invited out to Walmart’s headquarters in Bentonville, Ark.—a couple hundred people all told, including delegates from the National Council of La Raza and other identity-based groups. It wasn’t a high-budget trip. They stayed at a Hampton Inn and were fed boxed sandwiches and a buffet of barbecue and hush puppies. But Frankie Blackburn, a longtime community organizer with IMPACT Silver Spring, was won over.

“I really did see a genuine commitment to changing the way they approach retail in a way that’s responsive to these communities that are changing,” she says. Blackburn was even excited by the possibility of having a new gathering point for the lower-income people she serves. “It’s almost like a mini community center,” she says. “Maybe they greet you and say ‘hey, would you like to know more about what’s going on in the Shepherd Park neighborhood? Or maybe they host elementary school singing groups every Friday night, in the lobby of the Walmart. When you link it to retail, people are more likely to come out and see their neighbors singing and pick up toilet paper at the same time.”

advertisement

In the end, Walmart’s charm offensive even made a convert out of Manny Hidalgo, director of the Latino Economic Development Corporation, which has long recieved support from Walmart-owned Sam's Club. Hidalgo co-founded the District-wide business association Think Local First with Shallal, but the two no longer speak. The restaurateur’s anti-Walmart events and letters to the editor have made him perhaps the most prominent critic of the firm’s arrival, along with Yes! Organic Market owner Gary Cha, which irks Hidalgo.

“I find that self-righteous approach to it shameful. That, to me, is a clear indication that you don’t know the plight of hardworking poor people,” Hidalgo says. “Is Andy Shallal going to bring a couple thousand jobs to the District? No. He lives in a beautiful home in Adams Morgan. Please get off the soapbox, come back to reality, and realize that this is a complex issue, and we owe it to the people of Washington to look at this.”

Shallal rejects that interpretation.

“There’s this idea that we’re pitting people with means against people who don’t have means, that these upper-middle-class people are dictating what lower income people can buy,” Shallal says. “That’s really a bunch of baloney. It’s not about whether you’re poor or rich. Most people who can afford to shop at Walmart can afford to shop elsewhere. It’s really a choice.”

Hidalgo says an urban Walmart won’t have the same baleful local impact as the rural version. “To continue to think of Walmart as the Walmart of before is a lost opportunity,” he says. “You have to think about what Walmart can be…If all you do is oppose, oppose, oppose, what we call it in Spanish, you’re viviendo del cuento—living off the story.”

It’s easy to explain the support as a case of a firm buying loyalty with lavish spending. But Walmart’s approach is more subtle: It’s about character as much as cash. Rather than a cushy corporate junket, Hidalgo says the humble nature of his trip to Bentonville was what impressed him. “I realized, we’re not talking about a monster, like everybody says. We’re talking about America,” he says, remembering the CEO jumping into taste-off for salmon sauces made by different wholesalers. “It’s really a down-home corporation.”


Walmart has spent many years and millions of dollars trying to sweeten its image among future collaborators and customers. As it turned out, even those who stand to lose from Walmart’s presence didn’t put up much of a fight.

Take organized labor, which in other markets led the resistance. In the District, where private-sector unions have little muscle, organized labor accepted the premise that in a weak economy, nobody could stop Walmart from coming, no matter how hard they tried. When the United Food and Commercial Workers union commissioned a poll last summer, it didn’t ask, “are you in favor of Walmart?” It asked, “Would you support legislation to require big box stores to pay more than $12 an hour and hire from the surrounding community?” Some 76 percent of likely voters say yes, but the question itself was essentially an admission of defeat. Building trades unions joined the UFCW “Respect DC” coalition, which has proposed an 11-page city-wide community-benefits agreement. But they’re more concerned about getting union members jobs on those construction sites than getting living wages for those who’ll work within them.

Another weak link in the Walmart resistance: small businesses. Despite Shallal’s fiery activism, most of the sites are essentially commercial deserts. The only location with a real existing base of small businesses is the one on Georgia Avenue, but few have rallied to defend its junk shops and liquor stores. Especially when the firm has worked with nearby business groups to apply for federal grants—something the Beacon Brightwood Business Alliance needs a lot more than it needs living-wage regs. “They really just speak to regulating Walmart,” director Hasim Dawkins says, of Respect DC’s demands. “They really don’t talk about what we can do to revitalize a commercial district.”

Churches haven’t acted in concert either. A meeting with Waller didn’t win over the Wednesday Group, a fellowship of 30-odd social justice-oriented reverends and pastors. But other big blocs, like the Downtown Cluster of Congregations and the Washington Interfaith Network, didn’t even add their names to the list of organizations in support, saying they were preoccupied with other campaigns.

All that left a scattered opposition of ideologues—whose “Walmart-Free D.C.” campaign didn’t do its side any favors by showing up to grandstand and distribute hyperbolic literature at every meeting—and people concerned about things like traffic and drainage, which have nothing to do with who’s on the lease. That’s not a coalition that was going to tax all of Bentonville’s fabled political power.

Without any prospect of actually blocking Walmart, the only thing opponents have left is asking for concessions. And there, Walmart has done a great job of dangling the possibility of cooperation with various groups, while committing to none. At community meetings, Walmart liaison Keith Morris dances around questions about whether the chain will sign a document, saying that any package of benefits would need to be tailored to each neighborhood.

Two of the neighborhoods already have community benefits agreements requiring the developers to kick back some money, both resulting from zoning processes unique to those sites. But neither of those agreements asks anything of Walmart itself. For concessions like a higher starting wage and local hiring, the Gray administration has drafted its own community-benefits agreement, but kept it under wraps. Walmart, after all, doesn’t have to sign anything.

And at every turn, Walmart has made the case that it in itself is a community benefit. Top politicians certainly seem glad to help spread that message. Just as Respect DC was staging a rally, Gray—who was elected last year with overwhelming labor support—announced that Walmart had donated $665,000 for the city’s summer youth programming. It’s hard to demand more from someone while you’re busy thanking them for their generosity.

Even politicians on the council’s left wing see little to dislike about the massive company, despite its small-business-stifling, workers-rights-trampling reputation.

“The life has already been sucked out of downtown,” says Wells. “We’re trying to build it back. And America is used to shopping at discount retailers and we have a tremendous amount of leakage. So when we say ‘what are the community benefits before we allow you in here,’ it’s under that paradigm.” The Walmart in Wells’ ward contains 300 units of workforce housing and retail bays for small businesses fronting the street; he’s also working with the chain to fund a training program at the University of the District of Columbia.

Looked at one way, Walmart’s cakewalk is an illustration of D.C.’s southern nature: Trusting of big business, grateful for investment, deeply skeptical of unions. Ward 5 Councilmember Harry Thomas Jr., often a big labor backer, has been Walmart’s biggest cheerleader. And in Ward 4, Councilmember Muriel Bowser doesn’t think organized labor should get any special deference. “Dues-paying members are concerned that Walmart will drive down wages, and they won’t be able to negotiate for as much,” she says. “So that’s as self-interested an argument as any.” It may be true. But setting up consumers and workers as two different interests is classic anti-union boilerplate, and not the sort of argument Walmart’s cadres usually hear in northern cities.

Looked at in another way, however, it’s just more evidence of D.C.’s division along the lines of race and class. Tracy Sefl, a Democratic strategist who helped found Walmart Watch, notes that the people most disposed to think about Walmart’s global labor practices are less inclined to get involved at the city level. “The sort of cognoscenti that would have been and is engaged in this Walmart opposition intellectually as liberal activists hasn’t translated here in the same way, because Walmart hasn’t said we’re going to put the stores in Spring Valley,” Sefl says, referring to the rich, leafy Ward 3 neighborhood. “Walmart would say, this was purely economics, and they’re siting their stores where it makes sense to be. It still means they bypass that often white opposition.”

Over coffee at a café off U Street NW—not Busboys and Poets, which a P.R. rep laughingly declined—Restivo offered a made-in-Bentonville take, born of triumphs in much tougher environments than the District’s. With dead-serious eyes, he predicted the future as if some higher being had clued him in.

“When each of these stores opens in the District, there will be tens of thousands of customers who come in and out every day,” he said. “Those are folks who probably never wrote a letter to the editor, never showed up at an ANC meeting, never went and voiced their opinion to their councilmember, yet they’re going to vote for every day with their pocketbook. And that’s a fact that our critics just can’t dispute. And so as a result, they try to leverage lots of noise and misinformation, and that’s taken to be opposition. But in reality, when those stores open, they will be extremely busy, and customers will be saving lots and lots of money.”

Photo Slideshow: Walmart, A Tour

Our Readers Say

I hope Walmart will work directly with community groups and not just the Mayor and City Council to complete some community projects that are near and dear to local neighborhood revitilization. The Ron Moten Committee is working as "Friends to Woodlawn Memorial Park". The historical African American cemetry is the final resting place to such notables as US Senator Blanche K. Bruce (R-MS 1875-1881) and Congressman John M.Langston (R-VA 1889-1893). This site has been neglected for decades. For more information contact: Ernest E. Johnson 202-882-9790/RonMotenWard7@AOL.COM/Twitter@RonaldMoten.
Did it occur to anyone at City Paper to talk to anyone who is isn't in favor of Walmart coming in with no strings attached to see what they had to say about it, or was the reporter too busy getting coffee with the WalMart marketing rep to bother?
FUCK WALMART!!!

THOSE ASSHOLES WAS RELUCTANT TO COMMIT WHEN W.D.C. WAS DOWN AND THEY DIDNT SEE PROMISE. NOW THEY WANT TO JUMP ON BOARD AFTER EVERYONE ELSE HAVE LAYED THE GROUNDWORK, IS DOING WELL AND WAS HERE DURING THE COME-UP!

READERS GOOGLE WALMART LOCATIONS IN MD AND VA YOU WILL NOTICE THERE IS ONLY 1 IN MO COUNTY AND ONLY 1 INSIDE THE BELTWAY. ASK YOURSELF ‘WHY IS THAT?’ THEN CONTACT THE BAMMAS AND ASK THEM WHY.

THIS SHIT IS EQUIVALENT TO SOME JOKER GETTING A BROAD PREGNANT AFTER PROMISING HE WILL TAKE CARE OF HER AND HER 3 CHILDREN. AFTER HE WINED & DINED HER AND BOUGHT THE CHICKADEES A COUPLE OF OUTFITS HE GOT HER RIGHT WHERE HE WANTS HER. THEN BOOM~! HE'S ABANDONED HER, THE CHILDREN HE GASSED UP AND THE NEWBORN. SHE KEPT HER HEAD ABOVE WATER WITH ONLY 3 CHILDREN BUT THE 4TH TOOK HER UNDER. NOW THE VICIOUS CYCLE BEGINS. THIS IS WALMART COMING INTO D.C. YA’LL AND WE ARE THE PREGNANT WOMAN.


FOLKS DONT BE DUPED BY BEING PUT ON PROMISE STREET! WASHINGTON D.C. DOESNT NEED WALMART (ESPECIALLY IN WARD 4!). WALMART NEEDS WAHSINTON D.C.! OF COURSE ALL THOSE LATINO ORGANIZATIONS ARE GOING TO JUMP ON BOARD. WE ALL KNOW WHY! SERIOUSLY WE DONT NEED OR WANT THE TYPE OF FOLKS WALMART ATTRACTS, THE NOISE, ACTIVITY, TRAFFIC AND EVERYTHING ELSE ASSOCIATED WITH FOLKS COMING FROM MO COUNTY, WARDS 2 & 3 AND THE VA. FOLKS SCARED TO VENTURE DOWNTOWN. ALL THE STUPID MOFO'S IN THEIR UNDERSIZED NEON SPANDEX, DRIVING ALL OUT THE WAY TO FORCE FEED THEIR GLUTTONY TO SAVE $1.50 ON SOME PROCESSED FISH PLANKS, A CASE OF NO-NAME PURIFIED WATER WHILE SUCKING DOWN 2 FOR $2 BIG MACS.

ONE NEED ONLY TO LOOK AT TAVIS SMILEY’S SELL OUT ASS TO KNOW WALMART SUBTLE ATTEMPTS TO WOO BLACK MONEY INTO THEIR STOCKHOLDERS POCKETS. THE RURAL AND EXTREME SUBURBAN WHITE FOLKS ARE BROKE AND UNEMPLOYED. THEY ARE NOT SPENDING LIKE THEY USED TO DO. THEY KNOW THE BLACK URBAN DOLLAR HAS SUSTAINED MEDIUM TO SMALL BUSINESSES FOR DECADES DESPITE RIOTS, DRUGS AND BLACK ON BLACK CRIME. I’M SURE THEY’VE NOTICED THAT SAFEWAY AND GIANT HAVE NOT GONE UNDER. THAT IS WHY THEY ARE PUSHING THAT GROCERY STORE ANGLE. FUCKERS!
nice piece.
@Dolly

Yes, I talked extensively with people who are unhappy with Walmart coming to D.C. This story wasn't about them.
Noodlez, Walmart is a corporation not a charitable organization.

Dolly, in my opinion LDP has been pretty anti WalMart and I was suprised at such a quality piece
Brilliant story. Sure, it is not the only story. It doesn't try to cover the failures of DC and the reluctance of competitors -- eg BJs, or that darling of bougies, Costco, to come in. And it doesn't cover the revenue economics at all.

But, if I were Lydia DePillis's former journo prof or the WaPo editors, or the publisher who agreed to pay extra for all the work and vetting on this story ----- damn, I'd be proud for alt weekly journalism and myself.
"Today, Walmart’s four District spots have three things in common: They’re in areas where grocery and retail options are scarce ... The Ward 4 store, near Georgia and Missouri avenues ..."

There is a large, full service Safeway at the intersection of Georgia and Van Buren, less than a mile from the proposed Walmart site at Georgia and Missouri Avenues in Ward 4--according to Mapquest, it's 0.61 miles--a bit over a half mile. Directly across the street from that Safeway is a CVS. Say what you will about Safeway and CVS, the fact is that this area of Ward 4 has a large grocery store and a drug store in close proximity to the proposed site, so in terms of groceries and pharmacy, it's not underserved. In terms of other retail options, I would agree that pickings are quite slim. I live very close to the Safeway and CVS and it puzzles me why reporters always say that there are not grocery options in this part of town in articles about the Walmart proposal, when Safeway and CVS are so close to the Ward 4 site.
Ward 4...

1) The Supreme Court has made it known that Walmart can not be successfully sued in their High Court. So, do not look to your Councilmember to fight your battle against Walmart should the retailer renege on a promise.

2) I foresee Walmart doing a CVS and a Home Depot on your "trusting Citizens" at the cash register. That is, reduce the number of cashiers and replace them with self-service lanes.

3) Don't forget the U.S. commerce policy to save and support [big business] Walmart...because they are "to Big to Fail".


4) I see wooden boards on the doors and store front windows at Rite-Aid [Geo.Ave & Madison]; boards on CVS [Van Buren] and large boards at the Safeway [Piney Branch Rd.]

5) A traffic mess at the Georgia Avenue and Missouri Road intersection...

and everyday of the week including Church Sundays [day and night] TRAFFIC BACK-UP ON GEORGIA AVE. FROM THE MARYLAND STATE LINE south to New Hampshire Avenue, N.w.

Ward 4 life is about choices...and deception and lies and trusting others at their word that will and can change whatever was promised in the past.

Not a Sermon...just a thought.
@dolly

You're dumb.
Thanks Lydia for this insightful look. Walmart is taking over the world while destroying small businesses. We should just get used to it I guess. keep up the good work
At a time when the city is facing budget cuts of at least 65 million, why wouldn't the get some funds to offset these cuts. Funds that would be sent directly to road improvement, schools or parks and recreation or summer jobs to get the kids off the streets? I guess another Walmart is better than a balanced budget.
@Calvin

Please-

1) the supreme court case was about getting class action status for the case. The Supreme Court made no ruling on the merits. There is a difference.

2) Self service lines are in part a direct result of customer dissatisfaction with cashiers. It is all about convenience for the shopper. Why wouldn't a company implement a change that will save them money AND make the shoppers happier.

3) Seriously? Big businesses fail all the time. Walmart would nit behaved if they mismanage and go bankrupt. What happened with the banks is SOOO not even comparable.

4) Rite-Aid is dieing even without Walmart. They have been in the top 10 businesses sure to fail stories for over a year now. CVS is all about convenience and being the only "quickie" mart up that way they are not going anywhere. People are still going to want the places where they can quickly get in and out to get what they need. Considering that Safeway is the only other full service grocer in Ward 4 ( and remember the other Safeway near the Petworth metro will be closed for a long time while they renovate)....I have a hard time believing that they will be driven to close.

5) A traffic mess will occur at that intersection no matter what is put at that location and is no different from when the dealership was there or the Hechinger before it. Georgia is no picnic to drive down or up at any point of day. It is a main artery in the city and is expected to congested.
Walmart slip in the front door of the District of Columbia behind corrupt leadership, greedy and self-serving politicians and an unemployment rate looking for big business. Perfect timing would'nt you say? This is just another example of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. The story always starts out good, but ends up being a tragedy for those of us climbing up that hill.
No wonder Walmart "won". The opposition was made up of a bunch of self-righteous imbeciles.
Walmart already bought Washington Post and now they bought City Paper...great.
Lazy journalism for putting forth the "bringing water to the food desert" canard.

Walmart started waving its "we're the best thing to happen to the inner-city since indoor plumbing" banner shortly after it was glaringly obvious that the Feed DC Act was going to be passed passed. For those unaware, this is universally popular City Council legislation designed to provide subsidies to grocery stores and corner stores in blighted areas that seek to improve access to fresh produce. Yet not only will it have access to these taxpayer funds (it claims it isn't seeking subsidies and they're right in a sense - subsidies have found them) it will have an overall detrimental affect as academic study after academic study - those NOT funded by the retailer - show that new Walmarts lead to net job losses; never mind their horrible record on labor relations. More welcome grocery stores and corner stores - ventures that are less destructive and overbearing -will lose out to Walmart if nothing is done, and these neighborhoods won't live up to their potential.

And sure, Walmart might donate money here and there, but how much in tax breaks does it earn them? And how did they get such massive sums to "donate" in the first place? They didn't become the biggest corporation - and the biggest retailer in the US by a factor of 5 - by writing checks and being community friendly.In fact, one of Walmart's policies is necessitating that store managers, when they are first hired, move to stores 100 miles from where they are from. And the reason for this is to install managers with a sense of detachment from the community that they are pillaging.

Fuck these Bentonville Viceroys. This is going to be terrible for DC and shame on all our city councilors for selling us out without a fight (did they give you a free ride in a fully loaded SUV?) And shame - absolute shame - on The City Paper for this puff piece; for quoting Walmart issued surveys like they were gospel; and for not questioning why our notoriously corrupt city council is bending over backwards for these parasites.
What is interesting about this story isn't just that it feels very much like a puff piece for Walmart (notice that the only quote from someone who opposed Walmart is discredited by someone who has been bought off by them), it's that the story has been written as though this is done. Not one permit or license has been issued, no Large Tract Review or PUD approved, no ground has been broken.
Lydia is famous for snarky headlines that don't always match up to the story below, as this headline reads "How Walmart won over DC without a fight." Not "How Walmart Bought DC." Which is what the story really covers, though without any real analysis, is the politicians and organizations that accepted vast contributions (read: bribes). For example, Manny Hidalgo from LEDC, how much did his organization receive from Walmart? Why is that not reported here? Or how his organization surveyed small businesses in Ward 4 (http://ledcmetro.wordpress.com/2010/12/21/so-what-do-small-businesses-think-about-the-walmart-store-in-ward-4/) and found that 57 % of the small businesses thought that Walmart would have a negative impact on the community. What amount of money has caused them to take such a strong pro- Walmart position and now call them a "down home corporation?" Give us some real numbers on these contributions.
What about campaign contributions? How much did Mayor Gray and other councilmembers get from Walmart and Developers? Did you FOIA anyone or any agencies?
Ending an article with a paragraph long quote from a Walmart PR person does not wrap up a story in a conclusive way. It is not the kind of analysis we hope to have from a cover story in the City Paper. It feels cute, but lazy. We know Lydia is one of the hardest working reporters in town, so why use this tactic?
I will not hide that I am opposed to Walmart and am working with the community to make sure that IF they come to DC they should agree in writing to conditions that take care of our communities and don't leave our city devastated like we have seen in other places in Walmart's past.
Many residents throughout the city are upset about the way our officials and others have been purchased by the corporation. They have bought silence from some, and pitchmen in others like Kaplan and Hidalgo. Will we be seeing Walmart ads in the City Paper soon?
Hard choices. Yes we need jobs, but they need to be sustainable. Walmart is gonna pay a buck or so above minimum wage and very few of these 1,200 new employees will be able to afford the company's health insurance. A year after they open if 20% of employees are on the company's healthcare plan, I'll be shocked. So explain to me how this really helps DC? We do get sales and property tax revenues but those are partially or fully offset by other negative impacts.

As an example there's research out there about the # of Walmart employees' kids on public health insurance (programs like Badger Care in WI; PeachCare in GA etc) and it's usually very high. So our DC or Federal tax dollars end up circling back around to provide health care of poor workers children. (Which incidentally is a subsidy to the company, just an indirect one.)
I think I'm missing the "quality journalism" aspect folks are praising here. The headline makes it an op-ed over a supposedly done deal which hasn't actually closed yet.

Maybe it's just me, but I think "quality journalism" would be taking a close look at the actual impact Wal-Mart has when it enters a community, and then assessing the claims Wal-Mart makes against results. Similarly, assessing the claims made by the anti-Wal-Mart contingent would help the reader to get a better understanding of what's at stake here, rather than just getting the P.R. from either side. I'm actually offended by the headline that implies the whole city's been won over, rather than a half dozen non-profits and a, shall we say, ethically challenged City Council.

Here's where I went for info when I first heard Wal-Mart wanted in. Granted, it's an advocacy site, but many of the articles are peer-reviewed, and they didn't take me out for coffee: http://www.newrules.org/retail/key-studies-walmart-and-bigbox-retail

I don't shop at Wal-Mart and don't miss it, so they're not bringing anything to town I need or want, except jobs for my neighbors. My conclusion is that Wal-Mart does not produce real jobs. Period. We, the citizens of DC, will supplement their low wages with food stamps and Medicaid. I'm not paying taxes to subsidize the world's biggest corporation.

Please stay with this story. It deserves a lot of detailed attention.
I am dismayed that this article repeatedly cites the Wal-Mart claim that the four locations will create 1200 retail jobs without also citing the opposition claim (and the result of numerous studies) indicating that 1.5 jobs are lost from small businesses closing once a new Wal-Mart opens for every job created by that same new Wal-Mart location. This is a shamefully unbalanced piece that fails to cite the empirical data cited by Wal-Mart opponents. There isn't even any mention of the massive sex discrimination case against Wal-Mart for which the Supreme Court decided class certification was not appropriate, without ruling on the underlying merits of the claims of scores of women who allege sex discrimination by Wal-Mart.

I don't care about ad hominem attacks against Andy Shallal for the size of his house, I care about reporters sincerely making the effort to quote the empirical arguments of both sides of a contentious issue, statistics included.
Good piece of journalism, but it would be better as a part of a series, exploring consumer opinions, history of commercial development in DC, and prospective economic impact.

Once Walmart comes in, there will be no getting rid of it unless DC itself fails, and that's what concerns me. My neighborhood treasures its independent businesses, small storefronts, and minimal congestion.

Local businesses keep local funds in local neighborhoods, and the patrons' dollars don't often make the trip to billionaire CEOs in Alabama or Chinese manufacturers with dire labor and environmental records.

It saddens me when my neighbors choose not to see the bigger picture. Walmart's past has shown that promises often wither; whether it be relative to wages, community sponsorship, or environment. At the end of the day, a corporation expects to make a buck and the stock holders expect it to make a buck more than it did yesterday. Walmart will do that, and it will do so on the backs of the poor, the local businesses, and the environment.

I know I'll never shop there, but I'm sad that my neighborhood will still see the negative impact of their presence.
That Chicago study was worthless. The authors knew what they wanted to prove and used flawed methods to get them there. There are lots of effective rebuttals to it, just google it.

Even if the conclusions about its impacts on the Chicago community were not cooked, there is no parallel with DC, at not least in Ward 4 where I live. The Chicago neighborhood had shoe stores and clothing stores--we have none. We have liquor stores, pawn shops, takeout restaurants, hair cutters and ethnic grocery stores. Plus we have a really lousy, lazy Safeway at Piney Branch that might have to improve were it to face more competition for its customers.

I don't track the argument that Walmart jobs are not good enough for our unemployed workers in DC. Suppose we had a healthy mix of small businesses in that area. How many jobs would they generate and what kind of wages would they pay? Would they provide health insurance? Would our work force be better off?

That section of Georgia Avenue is like a mouth full of rotten teeth, with a big gap where that empty car dealership stands. I never hear seen a viable alternative scenario from the development opponents.

So the situation is complex. It deserves careful consideration, not a knee-jerk reaction.

I thought the author of this article handled the nuances very capably.

The Chicago study isnt the only one that shows Walmart to be bad for local communities. And there is more than just the Safeway at Randolph, which, I believe, is slated for renovations. And that area of Ward 4 is hardly the void that you describe it as. What utter nonsense that sounds like it came straight from a Walmart PR Sock Puppet.
Neshama, good post.

Of course the NIMBYs will accuse people of being a shill. Their humble brains can't come up with much besides blind assertions and EZ slogans, and that must anger them.

@ Bob See-NO ANGER!

WE WILL NOT BE BOUGHT BY BULL SHIT AND CHUMP CHANGE!
I don't care what any of you think or say and frankly tired of the whining. I am a resident of Ward 4 and I want a store, like Walmart, in Ward 4. If you don't like Walmart, then don't shop there. Or, come up with a better idea. Just stop the whining.
noodlez: "WE WILL NOT BE BOUGHT BY BULL SHIT AND CHUMP CHANGE!"

No, we'll be "bought" by a retailer opening stores on vacant lots in run-down deserts that other retailers snubbed. There will be a person to greet us with a smile as we enter the magical realm of unparalleled low prices. Always.

Look, Walmart is far from my first choice but two things made me OK with it: 1) They're going to open them. None of this floundering around and pulling out BS. 2) The stores look nice.
@Bob See-WOW!!! YOU CAN NOT BE SERIOUS?

CHAMP THE ONLY THING THAT IS GOING TO BE OPEN IS YOUR GLUTES AFTER THEY FINISH DICKING YOU THEN YOU WILL BE BEGGING FOR THEM TO PULL OUT.

"The stores look nice." THEN ORGANIZE SOME OF YOUR FOLKS TO SPRUCE THE PLACE UP AS OPPOSED TO THEM JOKERS COMING IN HERE WITH SOME TEMPORARY BAIT AND SWITCH FIX. YOU WOULD THINK THE WORST MAYOR W.D.C. EVER HAD WOULD HAVE MADE SURE THE PLACE WAS AT THE VERY LEAST WAS LEFT IN THE SAME CONDITION BEFORE HE HAD HIS FAILED CAMPAIGN BRING THE PLACE DOWN.

IM SURE THERE IS A SMALL TO MEDIUM BUSINESS WOULD FIT THAT SPACE. GIVE THE DOGGIE CARE SOME INCENTIVES TO EXPAND AND CREATE A FUNCTIONAL DOG PARK(NOT SOME OVER PRICED $400K SHIT AND PISS HOLE). PETCO OR PET SMART COULD ALSO MOVE IN TO PROVIDE RETAIL SERVICES ALONG WITH A ANIMAL CLINIC THEN YOU WOULD HAVE AN ANIMAL CENTRAL SERVICES THAT IM SURE WOULDNT BRING IN THE ELEMENT THAT A WALMART WOULD BRING.
At the risk of ruing my credibility on this forum, I am going to defend LDP and this piece. LDP has been consistently critical and suspicious of Walmart and I hope that all criticizing the piece will dig deeper on her views. More importantly, I do not read this as a puff piece of Walmart. I actually read it as the opposite. To me, this piece highlights the scorched earth mentality and ruthlessness that Walmart unleashes when it wants into a market. The way this piece is written, it does not portray Walmart as a community friendly Pollyanna of a retailer – it merely demonstrates how Walmart feels that way about itself and is willing to launch a full PR and political assault to get its message out. I would urge all of you to read the piece again with that in mind.

As for Walmart coming to DC. I have some comments or observations. One, I am reminded of the old Harlem and Bronx numbers rackets…which were run locally by Blacks and the Irish at the beginning of the 20th Century. When the Mafia decided that they wanted the Harlem numbers money for themselves, they swooped in, bribed people, killed people and either bought or took out the competition. I am not saying the Walmart is a criminal enterprise, but you get my point. Walmart wants in and they have the resources and the savvy enough to make it happen. It will happen. They are playing Bridge and everyone else is playing 52 Pickup. Geez, look at it folks. Second, Walmart targeted sites that had been undeveloped or underdeveloped for years – the most vulnerable places. It KNEW that no one had any viable alternatives for those sites because no one with deep pockets stepped up to complete development on those sites. All prior attempts had failed or never launched. It KNEW that the politicians in those wards (and District-wide) need a defining victory. It KNEW that the NIMBY factions and small business factions would not be a major threat because they cannot unleash the same resources and Walmart had already bought the politicians. Finally, it watched Target test the waters and make a killing in Columbia Heights (with significant City help) and it KNEW that JAWB would welcome it because Walmart did not have its hand out on the front end. All that is left to say is … CHECKMATE!
A retailer wanting to open a store here is a matter of right. To my knowledge there is no legal precedent that says that if a vocal minority objects, it won't get approved. DC officials are being accused of being "bribed" for following their own guidelines?

Less emotional outrage, and more facts would be nice.

Also, if people across town protest the stores, but most people in the areas themselves are fine with them, why should the first group feel they deserve more clout? Why do they think they're superior?

Little wonder I can't stand you people. You got your Target with no friction at all, in an area that had almost no retail. Now let people in other areas remain stuck with empty lots becasue YOU don't like that particular store, and tell them they're better off for it. You're a bunch of self-righteous hypocrites.
your store is the best one to shop at in indiana pa
Look at that, Andy thinks that Walmart wrote this. Walmart was the first to tweet and repost this story. I guess they also felt like it made them look good. I'm clearly not the only one to think it's a puff piece.
Walmart is the best store in Indiana, PA. Is Indiana a new foreign sister city to DC that I didn't know about?
I find it ironic, even tragic, that the NGOs who minister to society's poor apparently do not realize that the ranks of the poor are swelled by the economic practices pioneered by Wal-Mart, and the social policies pursued by the Walton family. Lori Kaplan and Manny Hidalgo give cover to the corporation and the family even as they work to destroy the middle class.
Indeed, the story wasn't about people who oppose Walmart's coming to D.C., six stores strong--we're merely ideologues.
By the end of the story, the reader can tell that it would have taken a strong reporter to resist Walmart's well-oiled PR machine. By the end of the story, too, anyone who understands the significance of who a reporter quotes in their final paragraph, understands that LDP wasn't strong enough.

Leave a Comment

Note: HTML tags are not allowed in comments.
Comments Shown. Turn Comments Off.
...