For those who viewed Michelle Rhee as an anti-union bully, the past few months have offered lots of chances to say “toldya so.” Soon after resigning as the D.C. Public Schools chancellor in October, Rhee began appearing with Republican governors who were busily making war on public-sector unions. But if longtime Rhee critics felt vindicated, another group has been less sanguine: left-leaning education reformers who worry that her moves could help tie education reform to a larger conservative agenda to crush organized labor.
Since the launch of Rhee’s advocacy organization, StudentsFirst, the optics certainly haven’t been favorable for her fellow Democratic reformers. In October, pugilistic New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie asked her to become his education commissioner. Rhee turned him down, but called herself a “big fan” of his plans to weaken the state’s teachers’ unions. Months later, Rhee became an adviser to Rick Scott, the Tea Party favorite who, as Florida’s governor, has fought to erect new barriers to collecting union dues. And when an even higher-profile clash over public-sector unions began this year in Wisconsin, Rhee was lauding its right-wing governor, Scott Walker, for taking an “important” step to rein in teacher pensions and “limit what they bargain.”
Rhee, of course, hasn’t gone so far as to propose ending collective bargaining. She’s repeated her long-held stance that teachers’ unions can play a constructive role in the public sector and in education reform. Though she’s been more vocal about supporting vouchers—Scott has actually proposed voucherizing the entire Florida school system—her basic policy positions don’t appear to have changed much, either: Even when she was a Democratic appointee in the District, she battled seniority-based teacher retention and touted teacher accountability, merit pay, and the like.
But following the jolt of her departure from DCPS, Rhee’s style as a confrontational advocate has seemed to blur the distinction between her views and the hard-line Republicans she’s worked with. The effect is to reinforce an array of right-wing positions that her left-leaning allies say they don’t endorse. “It’s counterintuitive, but if I were Michelle, I would say ‘I’m the poster child for collective bargaining,’” says Joe Williams, executive director of Democrats for Education Reform. In Williams’ world, tough negotiations with unions are a sign of respect for their existence. It’s something else entirely to wish unions away. “You’re always in danger of getting caught up in their style and politics, working with people who aren’t as careful,” he says. “You have that risk.”
That risk—of giving the appearance “that this all is just a stalking horse of union-busting,” in the words of Kevin Carey, policy director for the think-tank Education Sector—is something that Democratic education-reform types have long sought to mitigate. Ever since Democratic voters bounced her boss, Adrian Fenty, from office, though, Rhee has neither gone through the motions to allay such concerns—nor had liberal political allies to do it for her. “She is swimming in some politically choppy waters,” Carey says.
In fact, the same criticisms of Rhee’s polarizing public persona now come from erstwhile allies, not reform foes. “It’s very high risk—people have spent years trying to be clear that we’re sending an anti-teacher message, that’s something we’ve been very careful about,” says Kate Walsh, president of the National Council on Teacher Quality. “If you instead rattle the cage so much, people begin to fear that you have been full of it, and that you haven’t been honest, you lose them.”
“She may have to work harder to convince people that she’s not part of some Republican plot,” Williams adds.
There are at least some indications that Rhee may be taking tentative steps to reestablish her bipartisan street cred—a sensible thing to do, given that she’s announced plans to raise $1 billion for StudentsFirst, a sum that probably requires dunning liberals and centrists along with right-wingers. Last month, she announced that George Parker—the D.C. teachers’ union leader she negotiated with as chancellor—would become a senior fellow at the organization. “I hope, working together again, we can come up with ideas for improving how schools serve children nationally,” Rhee wrote in a Huffington Post piece. But can such alliances last? Rhee’s friends and foes are waiting, watching—and worrying.





Our Readers Say
These are separable issues, but if you wanted to critique Rhee's education reforms you would have to know something about them.
Please do some real reporting...
Another thing that would make this article add some value is to figure out what Parker's role is in the organization, maybe get a quote from him. Quoting an online opinion piece by Rhee instead is pretty lame.
Also, because it's relevant, you could have described Rhee's positions or attitudes on other big Republican issues like immigration and gay rights. Rhee would be pretty out of step with Republicans on social issues.
Where this article can be helpful is to explore more the question of whether Rhee is simply a bipartisan education reform advocate, as she claims, or if she's fallen on one side or another of the partisan divide, which exists even among the strongly pro-education-reform community. In other words, would Obama/Duncan ever appoint her to their Administration? I highly doubt it, unless it were to coopt her. Would a Republican politician? They have certainly tried in NJ and FL.
Given her history of cheating on standardized test scores, abusive behaviour toward students and teachers, and her role in the IG's report, she's one creepy charlatan... that should probably be prosecuted rather than given a public platform to tout 'reform' in service to right wingers like Medicare fraud and now governor of Florida, Rick Scott....
The cirtificated Adm. saw what was happening with the classified employees and said to me we need to follow your program. The one thing I saw in the cirtificated section they hired thechers with no management experience they had never supervised anyone before, never had to do perfoemance of their staff never was able to give a improvement plan saying this the improvement that's needed. If you are not able to set up and improvement plan for your employee showing that you gave the employee a improvement and follow up to see that the plan is being met then you are not doing your job.
Be it by design or something else, we have only to look at the Financial situation in the U.S.A. today, to see where so called changes for the better have brought us. Doing away with Unions, has turned this country into one where it's failing. To play with the education as put forth by so called smart individuals, seems like it's just more of the same. Are the children of America worth experimenting on due to political whims of others who have already gotten their education?
Prove that getting the changes called for, by getting rid of the politicians that are corrupt, the leaders of the Financial house's that have devastated the middle class, end the wars that have wasted so much in treasure, both monetarily & human suffering. It's time to clean house from top to bottom, before the cleaning in the middle or below takes place.
Gotta be a GOPer....
D'oh! Yes, Rhee has made the goals of the corporate-education-reform movement clear. Education policy is complicated, and a lot of centrist Democrat types were previously flimflammed. That's all there is to id.
Dr. Beverly L. Hall
Superintendent, Atlanta Public Schools
The last sentence is the kicker.
Repeated requests of the organization have produced no answers but rather a computer generated "thank you for joining" Does anyone know where this funding originates?
She is a DISGRACE to education, and is a CLEAR demonstration of what happens when an individual's personal ambitions collide with the better good of the community... She is a DISGUSTING and willing shill for the corporate right in America, and she should be ousted from any narrative involving public education FOR GOOD....
Leave a Comment