Well, Isn’t That Dandy? How tweed and knickers took over the District in 2010

Illustration by Brooke Hatfield

It’s no secret that style in the District is often less than inspiring. There’s a dearth of quality independent boutiques, twin-sets and pearls are still regarded as fashionable, and Georgetown—home to the city’s best shopping—is both hard to get to and filled with tourists and frat boys.

That absence of a compelling fashion scene may help explain why 2010 was the year dandyism went mainstream here. In its second year, Eric Brewer’s social group Dandies and Quaintrelles practically took over D.C., drawing more than 700 to its second annual Tweed Ride, sponsoring a Phillips After 5 party, popping up all over the District’s culture-snob blogs, and even winning some praise in Washington City Paper’s Best of 2010 issue.

What no one seems to have noticed, in the rush to praise Brewer, is that dandyism brings along its own vexing qualities—underneath all that vintage fabric, tweed riders really aren’t so different from the popped collar-and-Croakies sporting Sig Eps from Random Southern University.

According to its website, D&Q is “founded on the ideals of refined style and purposeful living.” Which, judging by the group’s activities, means dressing up in old-timey clothing, tooling around on steel bikes, and giving yourself a noble moniker like “Sir E. Channing”—Brewer’s better-known alias. The self-appointed tastemaker provides advice on the D&Q site about pressing concerns like what cocktails to drink, what bikes to ride, and what clothes to wear.

It’s not that Brewer has bad taste—it’s impossible to deny he looks quite dapper in his tailored jackets, pressed trousers, and bowties. But events like the Tweed Ride and the Seersucker Social amount to pretentious photo ops for lemming-like yuppies. The people who attend them are most likely by and large not aficionados of the ’40s style to which Brewer is so devoted. Many seem to be hipsters trading in their skinny jeans for a pair of ironically worn knickers, or party girls swapping their stilettos for Oxfords in the hopes of a spot on Brightest Young Things.

It’s great that Brewer has such a clearly defined style of his own. And imitation is the sincerest form of flattery; what a huge ego boost it must be, to throw these events and see hundreds of people fashioned in his likeness. It’s bewildering, though, that so many people would choose to follow suit. By virtue of the turnout at D&Q events, Brewer has been vested with a huge amount of power in D.C.’s sartorial scene.

But here’s the thing: Style is individual. Style is organic. Style is not ironic. Style is not about fulfilling someone else’s criteria of what’s stylish. The people who prance around in seersucker and tweed at D&Q events aren’t embodiments of style so much as they are affected copycats.

Here’s to people infusing next year’s Tweed Ride with silk, and velvet, and cotton, and whatever the hell they want. Maybe some people will even nod to safety and trade in their driving caps for bike helmets. In 2011, the District’s dandies should do Brewer a favor and let him be the individual that he is—by finding a style of their own.

VIDEO: 2010 DC Tweed Ride

Our Readers Say

All I can do is laugh at your piece, Erin. Go out and find something to enjoy, and write about that instead. You'll be doing both of us a favor.
"Style is not ironic" Really? Not ever?

Also,

"Dandies and Quantrelles practically took over DC" Come on now.

Also, shouldn't there be a moratorium on City Paper articles bashing the "tourists and frat boys" of Georgetown by now? Seems kind of played out.
Sorry MB and Ben, but this non-conformist bike ride thing is lame. At least wear a f'cking helmet!

The hip kids on their cool bikes are so tongue in cheek. But me thnks that nobody cares how cool they think they are.

Seriously, nobody cares how cool you are.
Mr. Bigglesworth is purring with laughter.
Dear Erin,

I may know f---all about fashion, but I do know you missed a big point of the Tweed ride, which is this: Normal humans can enjoy riding bicycles in normal-human clothes and--check it out--nothing bad happens (next to the day-glo lycra and space-cadet headgear that "cyclists" wear, even tweed looks normal). The way people talk in this town, you'd think that getting anywhere near a bicycle without day-glo duds and a styrofoam hat would result in instant death. Or mortifying sweat stains, which may be pretty much the same thing in your book. In fact, it's fun.

If I owned any tweed I'd join them for the next ride.

Best Regards,

Jonathan
Jonathan,


Tweed is not necessary to participate in the ride, it's just a suggestion. All you need is a sense of humor. That and the ability to throw punches. ;)
"But here’s the thing: Style is individual. Style is organic. Style is not ironic. Style is not about fulfilling someone else’s criteria of what’s stylish. The people who prance around in seersucker and tweed at D&Q events aren’t embodiments of style so much as they are affected copycats."

I admire your rugged individualism, Ayn, but most honest people would admit that your few is mistaken. Style is a distinctly social phenomenon, and people are characteristically socially-oriented. So we enjoy joining flashmobs, and we enjoy riding around for an afternoon in tweed--and thereby briefly become part of a peer group defined by our orientation towards a larger society. So I suppose you could say the tweed riders are like any other group that associated on the basis of material goods, yes.

Taking that to an extreme, and suggesting that to not be John Galt is to be worthy of Jonestown seem, is naive, if not downright silly. Maybe you like to hate on hipsters, as if they really exist as a group; but that would be strange indeed, seeing as you work for the *CityPaper*. By hypocrites abound, I guess.

But I suppose it's hardly worth the effort to point out that you draw false inferences, since your starting point is the claim that the "tweed" took over DC in some meaningful way. But the only facts you cite are that 700 people wore tweed for three hours on a sunday in november. 300,000 people on the mall for the Stewart rally might consitute a genuine taking over--at least of Penn Quarter, famous for it's eerie silence on weekends--but 700 bikers? For three hours? Hardly a major social trend. And you seem to think that those riders constitute membership of D&Q, but my sense was that 90% had never previously heard of the group, and STILL haven't heard the name Eric Brewer (though, clearly, you have).

So, what we have here are a few untenable conclusions drawn from unfounded pretenses, passed off as a legitimate reason to hate hipsters, courtesy the CityPaper. I'm tempted to offer a reminder of the maxim that the best way to spot a hipster is that they have a strong, detailed opinion about hipsters, but that might be at the cost of the rule being applied to me, too. So be it.
What a horribly ill-informed and downright pompous article!

Firstly, I've never been on one of the 'Dandies and Quaintrelles' rides. But if they have them in the future I'll try to attend.

I wear tweeds not because Eric Brewer (whoever he is) says I must, but because tweed is good looking, warm, comfortable, hard-wearing and stylish. I wear it because it suits MY style. The fact that others enjoy it too is a bonus. As for knickers, I would wear them for cycling (if I owned any) because they make a lot of sense. Currently I wear trousers in cool weather and they tend to get oil stains on them from my bike chain. Now knickers are getting more popular, I may be able to afford a pair - that's not a bad thing.

Wearing tweeds and cycling knickers is not "fulfilling someone else’s criteria of what’s stylish". This look has been stylish for a century because it's classic and classy. People like it for that reason - heck, you even admit it looks good. Dressing up once in a while is hardly evidence of a lemming mentality.

Leave a Comment

Note: HTML tags are not allowed in comments.
Comments Shown. Turn Comments Off.