As Terry Hedgepeth walked the streets of the District in October 2002, the 42-year-old prayed for a bullet. The D.C. sniper was terrifying the area with random shootings. And Hedgepeth hoped to become part of the carnage. He wanted to die.
By then, it had been two years since Hedgepeth got what he thought was a death sentence anyway. In late 2000, he had dropped his girlfriend off near Georgetown University Hospital, where she frequently had errands to run. They’d been living together in Capitol Hill for about a year, after a whirlwind romance that began when they met at a party. Hedgepeth often drove his lady to Georgetown, but she was always a little vague on why. This time, he managed to find a parking spot, and followed her into a building. He didn’t see her, but he looked around: He was in a clinic, with lots of pamphlets. They were all about sexually transmitted diseases. His stomach fell.
When his girlfriend emerged from a back room, he confronted her. “She tried to deny everything at first,” Hedgepeth says. When they got home, he kept asking about the clinic, and she finally told him what was going on: “I found out that she had been HIV-positive for, like, eight years.”
Hedgepeth went into shock. He figured he was screwed. “You sleep with a person that has HIV, and then you have it,” he thought. Just to be sure, he wanted to get an AIDS test.
He’d heard of the Whitman-Walker Clinic, so on Dec. 13, 2000, he went to get checked out. Eventually, Dr. Mary Fanning came in with bad news: His results were positive. The trauma of the last few months caught up with him, and he broke down—and shortly afterwards, wound up in a psychiatric ward.
Once he was out, Whitman-Walker took charge of his treatment. About every three months, the clinic’s staff would test his blood. Medically, he was doing remarkably well: No signs of infection.
But outside the clinic, his life was falling apart. He broke up with his girlfriend and moved out. Ashamed of what his family would think, he’d cut off all ties with them—so he had nowhere to stay. He moved into a house Whitman-Walker maintained for homeless patients, with three HIV-positive roommates; he started sleeping with one, a woman he found attractive, figuring he was already positive.
Hedgepeth watched friends he’d met through the clinic get skinny and sick. Though his blood still showed no signs of infection, he was sure he was losing weight and getting weak. His roommate moved to Phoenix, leaving him alone again. Depressed, he wound up back in the psych ward, where doctors put him on Zoloft, Ambien, Trazodone and Wellbutrin. He rarely worked, drifting in and out of housing. Though he’d “dabbled” in cocaine in the past, he started using it more intensely. “That was my way to go out,” he says. All he wanted was to die of something—anything—besides AIDS, so his family wouldn’t know he was infected.
As it turned out, though, he wasn’t.
For four years, Hedgepeth had been showing up at Whitman-Walker regularly, but he was never sick enough to go on any HIV medication. “Some people, it takes a little longer,” he says the staff told him. Eventually, a friend suggested he forego conventional treatment and try holistic medicine. So he visited the Abundant Life Clinic in Southeast, where doctors did a routine blood test—and found he didn’t have HIV.
“He sat there in disbelief for a minute or two and then he cried,” Abundant Life’s Dr. Abdul Muhammad would later testify. “And you could see just the pain and just the relief that came. And I teared up, myself. Because it is like a man being released from prison, being exonerated—because that’s what the diagnosis of HIV is like. It is like a sentence that locks you into a certain mentality, a certain status. And he was just freed.”
Another test at Johns Hopkins University Hospital confirmed Hedgepeth was negative. So he sued Whitman-Walker Clinic in 2005, seeking $20 million in damages. “Plaintiff has suffered damages which include, but are not limited to, severe emotional distress and anxiety, physical damages including loss of weight, loss of contact with friends and family, commitment to psychiatric facilities, severe and persistent depression and suicidal ideation, past present and future lost earnings, damage to his reputation, and the loss of nearly four years of normal life,” his lawyer, Jonathan Dailey, wrote in the complaint.
What had happened, according to court documents, was a perfect storm of medical errors. There are usually two tests for HIV: the Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), and the Western Blot. After a positive ELISA, the Western Blot is taken to confirm. But before Hedgpeth had his blood drawn, his chart had been labeled HIV-positive.
“Relying at least in part on [Hedgepeth’s] self-report, the intake worker made a notation in his file that he was HIV-positive,” court documents say. “The test administered...was ‘non-reactive,’ meaning [Hedgepeth] was not HIV-positive. [Whitman-Walker Clinic] admits that because of an erroneous interpretation of the negative test report, a ‘client lab results’ form showed [him] as testing positive for HIV.” A lab technician had entered the wrong result onto the summary page in Hedgepeth’s chart. Fanning, court records say, had the negative lab results, but still told Hedgepeth he was positive—noting that he was asymptomatic with a “normal” viral load. The clinic also completed a form saying Hedgepeth was eligible for the Ryan White program, which provides money for HIV treatment, and another that would make public funding available for medication. That form states Hedgepeth had a viral load increase of 30 percent or greater within the previous year, that he required a protease inhibitor, and that he was taking two HIV drugs—Combivir and Crixivan. None of which was true.
Hedgepeth thought he had an airtight medical negligence suit. In fact, his case was tossed out of D.C. Superior Court last year. Judge Robert E. Morin ruled, and a three-judge Court of Appeals panel also found, that Hedgepeth can’t sue Whitman-Walker, because he wasn’t physically harmed. The ruling hinged on a 1990 decision that patients can only sue for malpractice if they’re in a “zone of danger.” If Hedgepeth had taken HIV medication, the courts said, he could have sued—because then he could have proven harm.
Of course, he never had to take any medication, because he never had HIV. Hedgepeth could still win; last month, the Court of Appeals held an en banc hearing before the full court, which could lead the “zone of danger” precedent to be overturned. Dailey says he’s “100 percent” confident they’ll win.
Whitman-Walker spokesman Chip Lewis says he can’t discuss the case while it’s in court. But in its filings, the clinic says the saga isn’t all its fault. It can’t take responsibility for the mistakes of others, or for Hedgepeth’s breakdown: “Plaintiffs claimed losses, damages, or injuries, if any, were caused or contributed to by persons, conditions or events unrelated to and/or not under the control of [the clinic] and for which [Whitman-Walker] is not responsible.” Besides, Lewis says, it can’t happen again: “Whitman-Walker Clinic is committed to providing our patients with accurate and timely diagnosis and treatment. Our health center team works each and every day to ensure that patients receive high quality, affirming care. Since this incident 10 years ago, we have used advances in medical technology, including HIV testing, to improve the quality of care we provide to our patients.”
Meanwhile, Hedgepeth says he’s not angry about what happened to him—just confused. And, he says, the lawsuit isn’t about the money—it’s about righting a wrong. “I can’t figure out why it happened,” he says. “I can’t figure out why they treated me that way.”
Read about D.C. news, politics, media and more every day at washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk
Our Readers Say
I feel bad that this happened to him but if I was diagnosed with something even remotely serious as HIV, I would have been re-tested several times to ensure an accurate diagnosis.
OUR MISSION
Our mission is to be the highest quality, culturally competent community health center serving greater Washington’s diverse urban community, including individuals who face barriers to accessing care, and with a special expertise in LGBT and HIV care.
For more information, e-mail us at wwcinfowwc.org.
Did you notice the quote "special expertise...HIV care."? Give me a break for those who dare to blame this man.
www.myspace.com/rethinkaids
There are many, many problems with healthcare in this country. One of the worst is that people who don't pay for it, demanding something for nothing, then turn around and sue when something goes wrong - or even when the outcome is bad.
I pay for my insurance. And I'm tired of seeing my rates go up because other people don't pay for their healthcare...and then turn around and sue.
2. It can be useful to remember that a leading cause of medical malpractice claims is medical malpractice. In this case the doctor looked at a (mistaken) HIV-positive notation on the patient’s intake chart, and a (correct) HIV-negative lab result. A doctor who was responsible and competent would probably have seen the discrepancy and taken some time to get the story straight before giving any news to the patient. To do otherwise appears to be a shockingly lazy and unprofessional response to an otherwise simple records mix-up. For whatever reason, the doctor chose to ignore the lab result. If there was a sound reason to do that, it will certainly come out in court in defense of the doctor and the clinic. Right now it appears that the doctor's sole decision to not bother sorting out the confusion was what transformed this records error into a life-changing event for the patient. It is usually considered fair to hold someone responsible for harm caused by their unprofessional conduct in a setting where everyone had a right to expect fully professional conduct. Blaming the patient for this is unconscionable.
3. Whitman-Walker really ought to provide better oversight and accountability for their volunteer physicians. This doctor appears to have been at fault in what could be charitably described as grossly unprofessional carelessness, but the doctor is probably not alone in donating free clinical time while keeping one eye on monitoring their paying job, and one eye on calculating the tax deductions they’ll get for donating large chunks of free professional time. It is little wonder that doctors can be distracted or have other concerns on their mind, but when combined with a tendency toward not caring about the patient this is a troublesome mix. If Whitman-Walker wants to have fully engaged medical professionals they might need to actually hire and pay their doctors to ensure they remain focused, accountable, and responsible. At least they should provide some oversight to ensure that their volunteers are paying attention and behaving professionally. Otherwise the clinic’s many financial donors will probably be surprised to learn just how low the professional standards for patient care can be.
4. The City Paper might also be interested in finding out if this doctor is still practicing at Whitman-Walker, or perhaps practicing HIV care at this level of quality somewhere else in the DC area.
Google also shows that a doctor with the same name runs all AIDS work for the US Embassy in southern Africa, but that must be a completely different person.
That was the worst month of my life. BUT I would have NEVER allowed a one time FREE test to give me such traggic information without taking the time and RESPONSIBILITY to verify the results. Not to mention, anyone above a 5th grade education should know that ALL medical test are subject to error! THIS PERSON IS AN IDIOT AND TOTALLY AT FAULT FOR ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN TO HIM. If he should unbelievably win this case, I hope he never truely needs to utilize W.W. or anyother HIV relief center. They are completely underfunded as it is and he just possibly sentenced someone else to death when the clinic has to refuse care due to lack of funds! Did I mention this guy is an IDIOT!
Now he is playing the N___ERLOTTERY . Do you know how I know those he said are at fault at the Clinic were N____RS ? Because he hasn't pulled out his Race Card .
For those ( Haters )that are going to reply to this by calling me names or disputing this, jut remember you wil be only showing your own ignorance . So do us all a favor & just go do what you are good at by sniffing a T_RD & calling it Rose .
Thank You
Leave a Comment