UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DIVISION OF THE FOURTH ESTATE
In re:
WASHINGTON CITY PAPER, et al. ) Case No. 1982-2008-RIP
) Chapter 86
)
Debtors ) (Content Reorganization Requested)
__________________________________)
)
WASHINGTON CITY PAPER, et al. ) No. Adv. 28-25
Plaintiffs )
)
v. )
)
OUR READERS, LLC )
Defendants )
__________________________________)
VERIFIED COMPLAINT BY WASHINGTON CITY PAPER FOR
CHAPTER 86 CONTENT REORGANIZATION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST READER EXPECTATIONS
1 The Debtors in these proceedings are Washington City Paper (“City Paper”), to include its Web site, washingtoncitypaper.com, and providers of Editorial Content, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 133(w), 157(e), 221(s), 232(u), 334(c), and 486(k).
THE BANKRUPTCY CASE AND THE PARTIES
- On Oct. 9, 2008, the Debtors filed petition for relief under Chapter 86 of the Content Bankruptcy Code, Alternative Weekly Provision, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Fourth Estate.
- Debtor, City Paper, is an alternative newsweekly devoted to coverage of news, features, arts, and listings for the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area (“Washington, D.C.”)
- Defendant, the Readers of City Paper (“Readers”), are residents of and visitors to Washington, D.C., with expectations of well-reported long-form narrative journalism (“cover stories”) in addition to comprehensive and critical coverage of music, film, theater, visual arts, happenings, et al. (“arts coverage”).
A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
4. City Paper is a weekly newspaper based in the District of Columbia and printed at a plant in Fayetteville, N.C. The newspaper reaches 680,000 readers each month through its Web site, washingtoncitypaper.com, and via print distribution throughout the Washington, D.C., region.
5. The gradual rise of the Internet as a conduit for all the sorts of information provided by City Paper—from classified ads through news—has buffeted the paper’s business, as well as that of other print publications. City Paper has suffered through a typical onslaught of industry downtrends, including declines in circulation, display advertising revenues, and classified advertising revenues.
6. The journalism/content of City Paper has also undergone a significant upheaval in the age of the Internet. Even before City Paper began placing its stories online, its journalists suspected that perhaps not a great multitude of readers were reading their work. Specific concerns clustered over the paper’s cover story, often a long piece of narrative journalism exceeding 5,000 words. Other questions about reader popularity attached to smaller news stories as well, which often related to landlord-tenant disputes, police misconduct, and, once, the rise of chai.
7. Web traffic numbers have confirmed the editorial department’s concerns. In early 2006, for instance, a City Paper staff writer began a written correspondence with a federal inmate named Thomas Sweatt, who was serving a life sentence for setting a series of fires in the Washington area. The letters continued for more than a year, as did a parallel investigation into the damage done by Sweatt’s fire-setting. The investigation turned up two deaths from Sweatt’s rampage that the public did not know about. The story would later win the Livingston Award. The paper posted the story, titled “Letters from an Arsonist,” on washingtoncitypaper.com on June 1, 2007, since which point it has attracted 5,748 pageviews. Meanwhile, an item on the paper’s blog titled “Obama, You’ve Got Something….” has attracted 10,128 pageviews in the past five weeks alone. The blog item was a commentary, written in a ranting style, on the appearance of a fragment of saliva on the face of Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama during his 2008 convention speech.
8. The foregoing has significant ramifications for the editorial operations of City Paper. As disclosed in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing last month, City Paper’s parent company, Creative Loafing Inc. (CLI), is seeking protection from its creditors, most important from lenders who hold $40 million in CLI debt. As part of an effort to restructure some of its debt, CLI promised to achieve specific improvements in Web-related revenue, an initiative that is ongoing for newspapers in the CLI chain. (CLI owns alternative-weekly papers in Washington, Chicago, Charlotte, Atlanta, Sarasota, and Tampa).





Our Readers Say
As your attorney, I advise you to rent a very fast car with no top. And you'll need the cocaine. Tape recorder for special music. Acapulco shirts. Get the hell out of DC for at least 48 hours.
A. Will the printed weekly continue to exist or as less pages or become monthly or annual or millenial or whatever??
B. Will the website continue to exist and with what content and how will it differ from the printed material??
I appreciate your anger but please give some facts or turn your paper into the Onion or whatever. Snark and appearing to laugh at your audience is not a good way to retain readers.
Let it be known that we are now dedicated to providing the DC public with trivial bullshit all of the time as our editorial policy descends into that of pornography.
If CP no longer prints, what will I read on the Metro? Books? Nah. I'll have to switch to Avantgo web snippets on my PDA.
Your article did achieve one thing - it drove me to the website for the 1st time. I wonder if I can fit CP downloads into my Avantgo account as well. But then you won't get credit for my web clicks. A conundrum for the CP folks.
[Insert some PSA blather: now for the law according to all "wiki". Frolic: A frolic in the law of torts is where an employee acts on his/her own without obeying an order. When combined with a detour, where the employee makes a temporary physical departure from the service of his employer, the employer is not vicariously liable....]
True, I did miss the unique illustrations for columns like Savage Love... but I personally never complained about the newspaper's content. I invariably loved whatever they printed, and I can't believe that the readers of the paper would be so SNOBBISH about being "hipsters," as oxymoron as that seems.
I LOVE the long cover stories. Whenever I pick up the City Newspaper, that's the first thing I turn to! The articles are so probing, so intelligent, and cover such unique topics. You just don't, unfortunately, find this kind of journalism in many other places.
I haven't read the City Paper for a while since the venue in which I used to normally read it has been temporarily closed for a while, but until it reopens, I'm going to make it a point to read the City Paper whenever I can.
Just one criticism-- online hits DON'T correspond to absolutely how many people are reading the cover story, especially when you compare it to a blog that is ONLY available online. It should be obvious that most people are probably reading the cover story in the print version, as I do. I almost never read the paper online.
Every moment
I try to remember
the light af
an hidden report,
when my memory
outshines, when
your love disappears....
Francesco Sinibaldi
I have plenty of other online sources for news. I turn to the Citypaper to read about local events while riding Metro or sitting on the throne.
If more blog posts can help CP, I say, Let's do it!
The existence of blogs is fine, but no one should conofuse a blog with a news organization. We must have news, and more news, and if blogging on the CP Web site will help support that I am all for i t.
Thank you, CP, for hanging in there.
I am a regular reader of the Washington City Paper. I try to pick it up every Thursday evening at the Metro station on my trip home. Normally I'll read the paper either on the Metro or at a coffeeshop type of place.
I read pretty much all of the sections, but tend to merely browse over the theatre and movie sections. I always read the long article, and 90% of the time it's interesting and relevant. I did notice when the comics were pared down (at least you kept Dirt Farm) and the illustrations stopped changing. I suspected it was to cut costs, which this article confirmed. I do miss them, but understand their exclusion.
I regularly visit the washingtoncitypaper.com site for only two things - finding restaurant reviews and recalling articles from previous months. Frequency of visiting the site ranges from once a week to once a month. Other than those two things, I have no reason to go to the site. I just wait for the next issue to come out on Thursday.
I am sure there are a number of people who fall into the same category as me - loyal readers who read the paper edition every week, but simply do not need to go the Web site. Unless you can provide a reason - follow-up on long articles, perhaps - I'll continue to be a paper issue only reader.
your new overlords who managed to dive into bankruptcy less than one year later ought to apologize to DC. Why did I write that?
Life is so unfair. The Internet has ruined everything and when you put your stories on the web site no one reads them. But if you write enough housing and cellphone porn you may draw in enough new traffic to boost your page views a little. Did your chain dweebs tell you that? Yet?
You are a local pub and getting 6,000 people to read anything in this city is an accomplishment. I'm sure your traffic logs are mostly md-va-dc and that ought to be gold to advertisers, the smart ones at least, who know that you can bring in a local market.
Don't whine. Do what you do until they take the spoon away and then start your own blogs and rebuild this thing from the beginning. I know. No money, no health care but for emergency rooms. Bankruptcy, foreclosure, is the fate, ugh, but at least not the fast evaporation of pointless whatevers. Before you know it you're older, older still and dear lord now part of the perpetual crap machine industry.
Zen question: Why get into this business? A. Because you can't leave it.
Just remember to start your day with a healthy breakfast and this motto: chains suck; yell it your car, on the Metro and on your job. Big. But the power is out there and you got the power. Remember, do onto chains as they do onto you. John: chapter 11.
OMG, monkey, I need all that right now! CP editors, I call shotgun.
Are there no readers who care? The horrors!
Maybe the readers aren't at fault-- as this self-rationalizing parody suggests-- but the publication has lost touch with its community.
The CP has become a paper that more often than not seems to have written for the benefit of people who work there. If no one cared much for Jason Cherkis' story about his landlord, maybe it is because nobody but... Jason Cherkis and his landlord and their various attorneys gave a hoot!
Write something relevant, and readers will care...
You'd think that would mean that I'd go to the web site when the paper doesn't
show up but the reality is, I just don't. The last thing I need in my life is another website to read.
I guess I should just hope I live long enough to see the pendulum swing back to where people are starting up new newspapers because there's so little competition off-line.
Sandwiches, juices, vodka, Ho-Hos, wedges of good cheese, Greek yogurt - that sort of thing?
1) You spelled my name wrong. That's OK, everyone does. It was spelled wrong on my high school diploma and the personalized hockey jersey I received on my 18th birthday, among other things. (Fun fact: In the print media world, spelling someone's name wrong is considered a crucial error and cause for that most humbling of professional embarrassments, the correction. In the blogosphere, all you get is a "Whoops! My bad!" and a strike-through. How about that?)
2) I haven't worked at the Washington City Paper for months.
3) "Write something relevant, and readers will care... " Just in case you missed it, "7. Web traffic numbers have confirmed the editorial department’s concerns. In early 2006, for instance, a City Paper staff writer began a written correspondence with a federal inmate named Thomas Sweatt, who was serving a life sentence for setting a series of fires in the Washington area. The letters continued for more than a year, as did a parallel investigation into the damage done by Sweatt’s fire-setting. The investigation turned up two deaths from Sweatt’s rampage that the public did not know about. The story would later win the Livingston Award. The paper posted the story, titled “Letters from an Arsonist,” on washingtoncitypaper.com on June 1, 2007, since which point it has attracted 5,748 pageviews. Meanwhile, an item on the paper’s blog titled “Obama, You’ve Got Something….” has attracted 10,128 pageviews in the past five weeks alone. The blog item was a commentary, written in a ranting style, on the appearance of a fragment of saliva on the face of Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama during his 2008 convention speech."
So much for "Write it and they will come," unless by "it" you mean a blog post spit on the side of Obama's mouth.
But they don't seem to get it at all. It's not the readers' fault. The one story they cite, "Letters from an Arsonist" was a rare exception to the kinda shit that is all too common. Rants and raves, attitude over reporting, self-interest over relevance, and a look a tendency by their writers to look at their own navels and think they are the story instead of the wider world around them.
My Defense (Pro-Se) exculpable injury – Democrats took my job! It was not the economy; it was NAFTA-GATT, now WTO!
I'm not guilty, it's that the cleaners was closed, I ran out of gas ......., I love you! (Blues Brothers movie)
Your articles have always captured my interests. The Firebug series is still the greatest; loved the article about (Vinnie) Vincent Orange (or should I say –unlicensed illegal gambling interest – pay off?).
Yes the “D.C. Fire Tuck and Ambulance fiasco is riveting (to yours truly).
Donte Owens – very good follow through!
Please add insight into the D.C. Superior Court, the (dishonorable) Judge, Judith Retchin (?). i.e. Jonathan Magbie’s murder (my bad, D.C. Jail’s cover-up, and the Court’s escaping public scrutiny).
I had (two years ago) selected the WCP for advertising. (Your right about the intelligence of the general responses here :)
Again, a wonderful filing, in the Forth Estate!
Don't go .. Please stay.
Thank you,
Eglob
Leave a Comment